All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

H
hokita OP
Apr 04, 2023 at 08:54 AM ET
Transferring out
Well, Charlise Dunn and Maddie Vejsicky are gone. Dunn had serious promise. Does this mean we are bringing in a transfer or they just didn't want to sit again with King and Amoore? Ugh.

60 Replies

VaTechHokiesACC VaTechHokiesACC
Cool, go find some players in the portal.
T
techcabber
I'm sorry to see it but I do think it's the way the game is going.
Also, we are probably in as good a position as we could be to attract really strong talent right now. Even two of the commentators mentioned how much they would like to play for Kenny Brooks. I wish Maddie and Charlise well. They always seemed into the game even though they didn't play.
R
RJHokie
I thought this might happen.
Neither played that much, even in the "warm up" season. Wenzel might be the best of the group from that class and she red-shirted. Kenny probably has a few portal transfers in the works. The player from JMU would be a great get. As another poster said, the extra Covid eligibility year has put some pressure on roster management, but the portal probably has had more affect on the situation at this point. Kenny has had good success in the portal and after this Final 4 run, he should have even more success.
2
2hhoop3
The immediate transfer......
eligibility, NIL and, for a limited period here, the extra covid year has created a different dynamic to playing time and roster management. People saying Kenny has to play the freshmen and criticizing him for not playing them in blowouts could be right but, they MIGHT be ignoring the possibility he is looking out for the young ladies best interests. If they are not ready to play and contribute in the regular rotation saving them a year in eligibility either at VT or as a transfer by not playing them is to their benefit. Those not patient enough to wait or earn their turn can transfer with full eligibility in tact. It also creates options in how you manage recruiting. Do you allocate more resources to high school kids that are longer term development projects or mine the portal for collegiate tested talent ready to plug and play. There are a lot of moving parts these days compared to earlier times I think.
U
uber hokie
I’ve heard that several power 5 coaches are saying that
in 3-5 years they may not even recruit HS kids but TP only. Not that that’s what they want to do just what the situation will dictate.
2
2hhoop3
If you think about it.......
unless you have an in with a 5 star that is highly likely to play right out of high school why would you spend time and resources for a kid that could portal. I think the tipping point is not NIL or the portal but, immediate eligibility. I also think a reasonable compromise that might slow things would be to stall immediate eligibility until a player has completed their sophomore year. A transfer earlier than that requires the player to sit a year.
H
HokieFan14
Except for the two who are transferring both played and were therefore not
eligible to redshirt.
2
2hhoop3
Do we know......
if he spoke to them about redshirting and maybe they declined? I think there are merits to all sides in this thread. It can become a morale issue if players are working hard in practice and not getting minutes even in blowouts. It is also a matter of developing depth if the injury bug bites. On the other side if somebody is really not physically ready for whatever reason throwing them out there just to get time may damage confidence and development. Also when a coach has a rotation he is comfortable with he might be hesitant to mess with the chemistry. Finally, being down a coach may impact development, practice and in game rotation management. Maybe if TSL gets him on a podcast they can explore his philosophy on roster management and playing time. I am not saying what he does is right or wrong from a long term perspective but, it obviously worked out for him this year.
ONELLY ONELLY
Or is it because CKB doesn't see them fitting/getting a lot of time...
...which might suggest a recruiting miss. Or it might just be the law of averages. Maddie seemed to really enjoy herself on the bench, etc. She never appeared unhappy. Less clear on Dunn. Just my observation from watching the games. No inside info or anything.
H
HokieBrazil
Then KB has been having a lot of misses lately.Many of us called KB out for
having a short bench, when you are blowing out a team by 40 and you can't let your backups in, then you definitely believe they aren't good enough to even play against low-level teams. We are great in the portal, always tend to find contributors (Owusu being one of the few exceptions,mostly due to attitude, not ability) and starters, but our batting average for recruits being successful hasn't been very good last few years.
C
Cheesehokie
You also degrade team morale by not playing reserves (more)
The second string, and even walk-ons, work just as hard in practice as the stars/starters and make all the same sacrifices. But no rewards. It’s human nature to expect some recognition for your contribution. I noted several games where we had huge leads against inferior competition, yet CKB stuck with a seven player rotation. That’s insulting. I’m not close to the program but I think I understand human nature pretty well. We are in danger of creating dissension on this team because of this. Maybe we’re already there. Others have opined about the inability to develop reserves if they never get on the court. I agree with that. It’s very difficult to be successful in tournament play with a short bench.
U
uber hokie
Agree it’s the only thing that I don’t like about his coaching
style. Pretty sure he doesn’t care what I think but it’s just an outside observation and opinion.
HokieDelNorte HokieDelNorte
When you are up by 40, you have to play them so they can get better.
ONELLY ONELLY
Do not disagree
MidloHokie MidloHokie
This is no surprise. As I posted yesterday had K & K decided not . .
to return we might not have had any players left who had worn a VT uni. Lots of recruiting misses between Georgia and this Fall's incoming class.
O
orangeturkey
If this is the case, then we essentially have 4 players on the team, not
including freshman who have yet to step on campus. Roster (from Hokiesports.com): Wenzel - Fr Brooks - R-Sr - Out of Eligibility Amoore - Jr Dunn - Fr - Transfer Out Gregg - Sr - Out of Eligibility Soule - Sr - Out of Eligibility Vejsicky - Fr - Transfer Out Owusu - Sr. - Not returning King - Sr. Traylor - Out of Eligibility Ford - Sr - Out of Eligibility (not 100% on this one) Kitley - Sr. Geiman - Sr. - Not returning
Nelsonia Hokie Nelsonia Hokie
So room for 5 transfers in addition to 4 Fr
M
Midwestguy
2023/2024 VT WBB roster
Looks like WBB has a 14 player roster limit. So, with 4 returning and 4 freshman coming in it seems that KB has room for 6 players if he uses all of his scholarships.
C
carhokies
Look at LSU, they won it with 9 new players, transfer portal & 2 freshmen.
Even Alexis Morris was a transfer. Not one original player, Kim Mulkey had to start over this year. That is the crazy story behind this, no one gave them a chance, the coaching job was elite level. They played against squads of experienced seniors all year. VT is in good shape next season, 3 core players are seniors and 5th year seniors. Coach B can hit the transfer portal to get key players to fill in the holes. He doesn't have to start over. We are fortunate Kitley, Amoore and King are coming back. We can make another deep run.
DGHOKIE DGHOKIE
Do you want to become LSU?
VaTechHokiesACC VaTechHokiesACC
LSU or not, that's what college sports are becoming
DGHOKIE DGHOKIE
Really a shame. VT played well this season because they had a core of playe
ers who played together for 4 years. They added just enough to fill short term needs. We will lose that cohesive nature if we bring in a team of hired guns every year
H
hokieinoregon
I want to win it all. So in that respect, yes I do. Do I want bad apples?
Nope. But if we've had recruiting misses in the last few years we need to stockpile the team with portal players for this and possibly next year depending on how the new class performs. They are all top 100 players so maybe we'll have a better success rate.
DGHOKIE DGHOKIE
So next year we replace all of them with portal kids? Run the recruits off?
C
carhokies
No way, Virginia native, Hokie 4 Life! I just stated facts coz some Hokies
scared we only have 3 players returning, we can do something similar, hit the transfer portal with key players to complete the team. It can be done, we can make another big run next season.
H
hokeyhokie
2 players remain from the last 3 recruiting classes
I don't know how that compares to other programs. It makes me pay even less attention to recruiting. I'm guessing 1 of the 4 incoming freshmen will last more than 1 year.
hokiepro hokiepro
When players don’t play even in final 2-3 minutes of 20+ pt blowouts
They’re not going to stay As good as CKB has been um the lack of bench & depth development is glaring
V
VTCALS72
When schools don't have players, they go get some just like the players
who don't play. Has any that portaled from VT WBB proven they can play at an ACC level anywhere? Even in football, with all that have left VT, only one (so far) proved they could play at an upper ACC level? Robinson was close but no cigar.
A
AlaHokie83
Dara Mabrey. But that was a different situation, she was passed by GA
N
North Main Hokie
Also Trinity Baptiste
Played in an NCAA final with Arizona.
vtbball80 vtbball80
The extra year of eligibility from the Covid year has disrupted roster flow
There will continue to be transfers but when that 5th year for players goes away, it will be more normal - whatever that is.
R
RJHokie
Good point.
D
delmarva hokie
Adfitional COVID impact.
Good point. COVID limited the contact that coaches had with recruits and made it harder to evaluate talent and fit.
DGHOKIE DGHOKIE
Who will want to come here if they are constantly replaced by Portal player
V
VAHokie89
Or even worse, not even step foot on the court
C
Cheesehokie
Yep!! Kinda like our QB situation in football
HOHKIE HOHKIE
Get used to it. Like it or not, this is the way it is now. Embrace it or
become irrelevant.
H
hokie_world
That is the case for almost all programs today.
S
squarerootofone
welcome to 2023
VT Pops VT Pops
We don’t currently have any inbound portal players
so I don’t see the correlation. And even if that was the situation, it’s universal & applies to all programs.
H
hokieZ71
Vejsicky probably already behind incoming freshmen.
Dunn might have wanted more minutes than she'll get with being behind Amoore and King and probably Wenzel as well next year. We are going to be far better off with Amoore and King eating up minutes at the 1 and 2/3 next year anyway. And then there is the portal. If we landed a prime target like Kiki Jefferson, the minutes would continue to dwindle for Dunn and Vejsicky.
DGHOKIE DGHOKIE
And you know that how? That she’s behind incoming recruits
H
hokieZ71
Oh I didn't.
She's actually probably the best guard on the team and Kenny told her he'd rather have other people playing her minutes instead of her. He'd rather have portal transfers and rookies instead of somebody who barely played for the entire Final Four campaign, even though that player is way better. Stupid Kenny.... ** Edited by hokieZ71 at 4/4/2023, 12:39:18 PM
DGHOKIE DGHOKIE
Who said that it was Kenny’s decision?
hokiepro hokiepro
Mackenzie Nelson is an elite scoring PG
She’d be ahead of Vejsicky right now
V
VT_Consul
Source?
B
baumerj
It's on twitter
Link: Tweet
UberHOKIE UberHOKIE
Players want to play
S
squarerootofone
there are currently approx 400 players in the portal. i'm not worried.
TomTurkey TomTurkey
like 1352 guitar pickers in Nashville
H
HokieJack
Going into the portal is risky for marginal players.
The minute they go in the portal, they have given up their schlarship. If they decide to stay, the VT can decide whether to give them a scholaship or not. By watching them practice for a year, Kenny will know if they are worth holding on to or if the scholarships can be better used with someone else.
DGHOKIE DGHOKIE
Not so. They are good for the semester
H
HokieJack
Yes, and the current semester has about 5 weeks left.
Next season, no scholarship. If fact, if someone goes into the portal now, they are guaranteed nothing after May.
D
DW Hokie
This is the down side of having long-time starters return for another year.
No stirring of the roster, limited opportunities for anyone else to play. Don't get me wrong -- I love that Kitley and King are coming back. But it's just a fact that people may not stay when their potential playing time keeps getting pushed back. I sure hope CKB makes a big commitment to getting more of the roster involved next season.
V
VAHokie89
It is more than just having long-time starters. You can have starts and sti
play subs. You can still play a bench. So the issue is not having entrenched starters. The issue that players didn't step foot on the court AT ALL over the non-creampuff part of the season. That is telling. It is hard for people to say "i love this team" if they have no chance to play at all. Even when players got into foul trouble, no one got on the court. Vejsicky did in one game...
B
bghokie
Hope we somehow have a10 person rotation early, and no less than 8 later on
S
soflahokie
Shouldn’t have burned their redshirts, we are 100% bringing in transfers
The world of 4-5 year players is over, it’s all about reloading in the portal every year if you don’t run a complex system. Neither are a big loss, Dunn is the more promising of the 2 and it sucks to lose an Aussie but we’ve got 4 better players coming in as freshmen. She may have played as a deep rotation piece, Vesjicky likely wouldn’t play until junior year. Rotation will probably be: PG - Amoore, Nelson G - Wenzel, Suffren G - King, Baker F - Transfer, Transfer C - Kitley Ideally we could redshirt some of the freshmen and replace their roles with transfers
Stork Stork
This year was wasted for them.
rjh4vt rjh4vt
Combo of high rated recruits coming in, transfer coming and lack of
patience.
IB4TECH IB4TECH
Better to do it early than later.