Chris Arvin on 247 just added Vibes.**
[Post edited by Femoyer Hokie at 05/04/2022 07:37AM]
36 Replies
C
chagerma
4y
Question now is, is Basile athletic enough to play the 4 and someone like Osun be signed to play the 5.
(In response to this post by Femoyer Hokie)
V
Vippie1
4y
we can now put a starting 5 on the court that can spread a defense and really open the court. 1-5 will be able to fill it up from deep. VT will definitely be fun to watch. How good , we'll see.
Now time to shore up some depth.
Now time to shore up some depth.
(In response to this post by Femoyer Hokie)
4y
This is the most critical piece for us to be be a contender next season. Still need to backfill that 4 or bring back Mutts, but this is a giant gaping hole filled by CMY.
This will also be the year we need to bring Kidd along so that he can provide depth and develop for when Basile leaves. Basile has 2 years of eligibility but it would probably be a mistake to assume any more than one year before he goes pro.
This will also be the year we need to bring Kidd along so that he can provide depth and develop for when Basile leaves. Basile has 2 years of eligibility but it would probably be a mistake to assume any more than one year before he goes pro.
(In response to this post by Vippie1)
4y
Can now focus on a second big, Mutts/replacement and (hopefully) a big wing
(In response to this post by Femoyer Hokie)
4y
(In response to this post by GCHokie34)
S
Squatro
4y
So the questions are:
1. Can Basile draw double teams?
2. How do we look on defense?
3. Can we stay healthy?
Would be interested on opinions on the first two questions.
[Post edited by Squatro at 05/04/2022 09:53AM]
1. Can Basile draw double teams?
2. How do we look on defense?
3. Can we stay healthy?
Would be interested on opinions on the first two questions.
[Post edited by Squatro at 05/04/2022 09:53AM]
(In response to this post by GCHokie34)
4y
Falling flat against good teams does that to you, but we shot like 39% as a team
(In response to this post by Squatro)
4y
And yes, next year's team should shoot it even better
(In response to this post by Squatro)
4y
(In response to this post by GCHokie34)
Here are his highlights against NC State...
Dropped 23 on the Pack.
(In response to this post by GCHokie34)
4y
(In response to this post by Chris Coleman)
C
chagerma
4y
Was hoping he was athletic enough to play 4 and bring in Osun to play 5. Not so sure I see it. Looks much slower than Mutts.
(In response to this post by Chris Coleman)
4y
addition to having an outside shot. Great get!
(In response to this post by Chris Coleman)
Does he have the lateral quickness to defend the perimeter
against a 3?
(In response to this post by Femoyer Hokie)
4y
thoughts on Basile? If you have time and I would assume he is expected to come in and play?
(In response to this post by GCHokie34)
4y
Very good offensively. Shot 40+% 2 seasons ago from 3. As close to a 1:1 replacement of Aluma as you can get. He will fit in very well.
(In response to this post by SCHokie1103)
C
chagerma
4y
(In response to this post by GCHokie34)
4y
Just hoping he is proficient on the defensive end too.
(In response to this post by GCHokie34)
4y
What would be the lineup:
Pedulla
Cattoor
Maddox
???
Basile
??? = Camden, Kidd, Buchanan, Rice, Collins, Wessler
Choice of big lineup (Kidd, Wessler), semi big lineup (Camden, Buchanan), small lineup (Rice, Collins).
I appears, from watching his teams, Coach Young would go with semi big lineup with everyone else filling in other available free minutes. Camden with Buchanan backing him up.
Pedulla
Cattoor
Maddox
???
Basile
??? = Camden, Kidd, Buchanan, Rice, Collins, Wessler
Choice of big lineup (Kidd, Wessler), semi big lineup (Camden, Buchanan), small lineup (Rice, Collins).
I appears, from watching his teams, Coach Young would go with semi big lineup with everyone else filling in other available free minutes. Camden with Buchanan backing him up.
(In response to this post by GCHokie34)
4y
in the court. But I’d rather ask and learn than not ask and be in the dark when I hear people say he’s a 2 or 3 etc etc. I would assume a 5 is the center position? Thanks
(In response to this post by GCHokie34)
4y
1 - PG
2 - SG
3 - SF
4 - PF
5 - C
2s and 3s are the exact same under MY, thus why having someone who can play 3 and 4 is more difficukt because youre asking someone to guard 2s, 3s, and 4s. 2s and 3s can vary in skill and athleticism across basketball, so you may be able to defend **some** 2s, but not others. This means certain lineups and teams they would play primarily the 4 and others they could move to the perimeter (2, 3 and 4)
2 - SG
3 - SF
4 - PF
5 - C
2s and 3s are the exact same under MY, thus why having someone who can play 3 and 4 is more difficukt because youre asking someone to guard 2s, 3s, and 4s. 2s and 3s can vary in skill and athleticism across basketball, so you may be able to defend **some** 2s, but not others. This means certain lineups and teams they would play primarily the 4 and others they could move to the perimeter (2, 3 and 4)
(In response to this post by SCHokie1103)
4y
better understanding of basketball talk when you guys start using numbers😎
(In response to this post by GCHokie34)
4y
Players who can play 2 spots become matchup problems for the other team's defense. But, when we are on defense, would we be exposed to matchups also. That's the chess match between coaches. Who blinks first?
(In response to this post by GCHokie34)