All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

H
Hokie_N_NC OP
Nov 06, 2025 at 10:33 AM ET
I'm over it now. I've said from the beginning
that I wanted Chesney, then Franklin came into play and I wanted him, Franklin, first and Chesney a close second. Now, I'm all in on Chesney. He is younger, shown he can win ANYWHERE. I think he has the pulse of today's kids. I don't know if he can recruit like Franklin but with NIL recruiting will take a back seat. Bring On CHESNEY

54 Replies

V
vtlee
8mo
Hasn't shown he can win on the P4 level. Never even been a P4 assistant
Seems like hiring a rookie OC/DC/HC again
BG Hokie BG Hokie
8mo
No, it doesn't.
hoosnowahokie hoosnowahokie
8mo
Curt Cignitti on Line 1.
F
fordham
8mo
Billy Napier on line 2
D
dbc05
8mo
If Cignetti went 6-6 last year Chesney wouldn't be on our radar
Gambling on lightning striking twice at the same place in 2 years is nuts
V
vtlee
8mo
CC had been an assistant at P4 multiple stops including Bama
hoosnowahokie hoosnowahokie
8mo
15 yrs ago. The game's a bit different now.
Having position coach experience at the P4 level should not qualify you over someone that has winning Head Coaching experience anywhere.
Hokiefied Hokiefied
8mo
Please tell me what’s meaningfully different about COACHING P4?
I’ll grant you the administration part of the job is bigger but VT is hiring a GM and building a football org that’s explicitly focused on that part thereby putting a lot of resources around his weaknesses. Now back to football. The game is the same and he’s a noted Xs & Os guy who adjusts well in game. He’s been a HC for over a decade so it’s laughable to say he’s a rookie HC.
V
VTCALS72
8mo
IMHO The players are bigger, faster and better, especially on D.
The most Defenses at the P2 and little p2 level can forces offenses to play in much smaller windows.
Hokiefied Hokiefied
8mo
Fair but I see that as applied Xs & Os
If I have this type of player I do this. If I have that type of player I do that. Given he’s repeatedly leveled up in his HC career he’s shown the ability to adapt in that manner. If he’d been in D3 for his entire career that would be a concern.
V
VTCALS72
8mo
And what if you have the players to execute at x speed but the D can do x-?
Stork Stork
8mo
Recruiting
M
marcbvtgm
8mo
Nonsense.
Hokiefied Hokiefied
8mo
GM
V
vtlee
8mo
He would be a rookie P4 HC.
Has he ever hired a GM before? How big is his coaching tree? The VT HC will have to be fundraiser-has he ever really had to do? Has he ever managed an organization this big? Or even seen one managed? VT is ready to throw some money at the FB issue but, the next HC has to know how to effectively spend it. Back to football. Guys like Gundy, Fuente, Kelly, etc didn't forget how to coach Xs and Os. The job has changed. It's much more than just on the field. Notice all the older coaches getting out or getting fired. Hiring a HC is a crapshoot. He might be awesome but, he has some risk too ** Edited by vtlee at 11/6/2025, 1:05:58 PM
Hokiefied Hokiefied
8mo
The search committee is hiring the GM. Not the coach.
He may have a say in it but he won’t be alone. And he’s been coaching college football his entire career. Fundraising is a part of the gig at every level and, again, he’ll have more support than any previous coach in that space. As for those coaches, Gundy stayed too long, got lazy, & failed to adapt. Fu got knee capped by the Beamer 4-evs mob, and Kelly left Notre Dame because he said he couldn’t win a natty there (LMAO, thank you Marcus Freeman). Not exactly proving your point with those examples.
C
crazylane
8mo
I've seen his teams play twice
Scored 70 against at UNC. Beat Louisville in the trenches at their place and Louisville was fortunate to get the win with a couple big plays. And they absolutely take care of business in their league which isn't easy. I'd be happy with the hire.
V
vtlee
8mo
I'm sure he's an awesome ball coach. He's just never had to deal with
a lot of the issues he'll have to deal with on the P4 level- many of which have little to do with on field FB. He's never had to fundraise, never had to manage a huge staff, never had to negotiate a high level NIL program, never had to recruit on a high level, never had to deal with the press/fan scrutiny of a high level program, etc. Hiring a HC is a crapshoot. He might be an awesome P4 HC but, let's not forget he'll have a lot of learning he'll have to do on the job.
M
marcbvtgm
8mo
Yet for all of that, his team is more than competitive w/ P4 teams
Punching up impresses me a lot more than punching down
Hokiefied Hokiefied
8mo
This is why VT is hiring a GM & building a football organization
V
vtlee
8mo
The next HC will hire the GM and create the organization
Hokiefied Hokiefied
8mo
He will be a part of it with the committee. That’s already been stated.
AirborneHokie96 AirborneHokie96
8mo
Are you still "Team Pry" Lee?
V
vtlee
8mo
Are you still "Team Fuente"?
AirborneHokie96 AirborneHokie96
8mo
Yes. Of course. Good guy that got lied to over & over at VT within VTAD
S
st_andrew
8mo
Doesn’t mean it’s the wrong decision.
V
vtlee
8mo
Just pointing out he hasn't "shown he can win ANYWHERE"
M
marcbvtgm
8mo
Neither had, say, Urban Meyer. But he punched up everywhere he had been.
And he magically recruited much better at Utah than at Bowling Green and recruited much better at Florida and OSU than at Utah. There are far more examples of guys who punch above their weight class having more success moving up in class than guys who push below their weight class having success moving down. But, yes, nothing is guaranteed.
H
hokie18
8mo
I agree, I’m all in for Chesney He’s won everywhere he’s been. As the
saying goes: past performance is indicative of future results
F
fordham
8mo
Look around many many examples of that statement being
Way false
M
marcbvtgm
8mo
Look at the dirth of fired blue blood coaches succeeding at non-blue bloods
W
Windows NT
8mo
who you want now, you will most likely get
T
The_VT_Rock
8mo
For Chesney, we could have a small problem...
If JMU sneaks into the play-offs, then Chesney is not available until almost Christmas (unless he pulls out since JMU would likely be knocked out the 1st round).
C
crazylane
8mo
Also, Teel mentioned they're almost winning too much
Plus their second halves have been incredible. He said he wouldn't be surprised if Penn St doesn't kick the tires on him. ** Edited by crazylane at 11/6/2025, 12:38:47 PM ** Edited by crazylane at 11/6/2025, 12:39:19 PM
Techsupport Techsupport
8mo
PSU brought in 28 high school players / 8 portal transfers...
HS recruiting isn't actually taking a back seat...it's taken a backseat here at VT because we can't get much talent out of high schools anymore, but the portal hasn't replaced high school recruiting everywhere, it mainly replaces guys that are transferring or are busts. Secondly, there's good reason to believe that there's going to be a modicum of return to sanity on the NIL front. University rev share is being capped, and there are measures in place to limit NIL money to legitimate business purposes, and not payforplay. How enforceable that is remains to be seen, but I think there's reason to believe players will start looking at schools again for more reasons than just the highest bidder. So, I think high school recruiting can still be super important. ** Edited by Techsupport at 11/6/2025, 11:33:33 AM
AirborneHokie96 AirborneHokie96
8mo
“Pay-for-play” will still persist at P2 football schools despite Rev share
Yes, "The House v. NCAA" settlement introduces a clearinghouse—run by Deloitte—to vet NIL deals over $600 for "fair market value" and compliance. Revenue sharing is separate from NIL and will be school-funded, with its own oversight mechanisms. But it doesn’t prevent third-party collectives or boosters from offering NIL deals using Delaware based corporations controlled by lawyers who could argue FMV until they are blue in the face. The P2 controls the enforcement, not the NCAA. The NIL Clearinghouse itself wouldn’t be able to block certain deals—instead, it would just flag them. Schools will be in charge of determining the difference between a booster and collective versus a non-affiliated brand. And Deloitte will potentially charge hefty fees, anywhere from $5,000 to $500,000 per school. Plenty of questions remain and no one seems to want to answer them at this poing..... including whether it’s legal for the NCAA and conferences to determine “fair-market value”; what penalties athletes will face if they refuse to participate in the process or go forward with deals regardless; or whether the rules are enforceable. And boosters have long found ways to skirt the rules. With FMV very subjective, all it would take is for a booster to have a star player create an Instagram page, Pay $1000-2000 to an Indian/Chinese "farm" to create 20K-50K in "followers" practically within a week and then argue that the star players's social media reach or brand appeal is there to justify a single $500K NIL from Company A.
M
marcbvtgm
8mo
Dabo agrees. Not working out for him either, but he agrees
How many of those 28 will remain at PSU for all 4/5 yrs? I'll bet very few. That's why HS recruiting just isn't that important. It's not to say it's meaningless, but it is not remotely the foundation of how program is built and maintained anymore. Do you suddenly think the schools and backers which cheated for a hundred years to get a competitive advantage will suddenly play by these supposed new NIL rules? LOL. ** Edited by marcbvtgm at 11/6/2025, 11:52:47 AM
E
EDGEMAN
8mo
I'm thinking in the future you'll see fewer HS players recruited to the...
...big programs. They'll probably have to display their value at a lower level before receiving a huge NIL payout at the top college football level. Now that excludes the "can't miss" high school players that you know will be in the NFL down the road...
M
marcbvtgm
8mo
You'll still see ~25 HS players recruited and signed by blue bloods.
But they'll be even quicker to pay the cream of the crop and cut the cord on the others. ** Edited by marcbvtgm at 11/6/2025, 1:53:33 PM
E
EDGEMAN
8mo
Are you saying total, or cumulative?
M
marcbvtgm
8mo
Huh? Per class.
E
EDGEMAN
8mo
No problem. I read that Franklin would bring a bunch of PSU players...
...with him when he signs with VT...lol
N
NoHuddle
8mo
Maybe his agent is negotiating a settlement on the buyout w PSU right now
BG Hokie BG Hokie
8mo
Somewhere between 1 and 6, if I were to guess.
VTizzle VTizzle
8mo
Chesney is still coaching, so even though we both like him... we wait.
Franklin opportunity would be much much sooner.
V
VaPoly07
8mo
I hear ya but JF name recognition would bring in better recruits year 1
I love Chesney too
M
marcbvtgm
8mo
Maybe a little better recruiting. But most will be elsewhere in 2-3 yrs.
GCHokieof91 GCHokieof91
8mo
Benjamin Franklin name recognition
is all these recruits care about.
BG Hokie BG Hokie
8mo
Name recognition is overrated IMO.
M
marcbvtgm
8mo
Programs that chase name recognition are often the dysfunctional ones.
MDHokie79 MDHokie79
8mo
To wit, Belechick
M
marcbvtgm
8mo
To wit, Mack Brown.
hokie77 hokie77
8mo
Wouldn't be that confident we could get Chesney; other schools interested.
And probably already in backroom discussions with agent Sexton. Some assume he would be a sure thing to accept VT offer.
H
Happy Dog
8mo
If ya got NIL $$$, that's half the recruiting game if not more