All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

V
VT_Retiree OP
Aug 24, 2025 at 12:19 PM ET
How much money players are making - Wow!
** Edited by VT_Retiree at 8/24/2025, 12:25:21 PM

57 Replies

C
chagerma
11mo
The sad thing is, they have zero sense to put that away in an IRA or...
real estate. If I was paid $500k in a year with the expenses I had in college (ie. not much), 85% of it would be going to investments. I have to think it's the inverse.
S
saret
11mo
Once they started getting paid, they became adults.
They are subject to the same responsibilities/accountabilities as the rest of us. They can handle their own consequences.
TekkNerd TekkNerd
11mo
That's you now. Would 19 year old you do the same? I wouldn't have.
I agree that most of these kids are just going to blow through it. Part of it is youth and immaturity, the other part is they assume if you're payed like a pro, you'll always be a pro. I don't think most will ever earn as much money per year again.
C
chagerma
11mo
The IG age is different. You're right. It was a big deal to go to Roanoke
...to get some new gear when I was in school in the late 90s. Now you can shop from your phone. But, honestly, outside of a cool car and some kicks, what does a college kid need? Hell, beers are $4.
M
marcbvtgm
11mo
No offense, but where have you been the last few years?
G
GBOHokie
11mo
What happened to the clearing house?
I know what my company used to pay well known people (Brett Favre, Nolan Ryan) for print and TV ads. No way anyone would know or relate to some offense tackle making that much money. I thought there was to be a process to vet NIL to make sure the value was correct.
AirborneHokie96 AirborneHokie96
11mo
There are two separate buckets of money....
Revenue sharing from the school and NIL. Both separate buckets. I am pretty sure that the article is talking about the revenue sharing budgets and amounts allocated to players to be paid from the athletic departments. I think VT is allocating about $14-16M of their $20.5M to football players.
G
GBOHokie
11mo
I realize two buckets. But hard to
Make the math work. Especially with increased roster size. Just a starting qb and rb takes away 2 to 3 million. Then you look at reserves a second and third string qb and rb will cost or they will be somewhere else. Hard to squeeze those numbers into 16 million. Across the board second string needs to be paid or they will go elsewhere. If I take 44 players as your 2 deep. Divide into 16 million it’s 363k or so. Doesn’t sound bad. But that leaves zero for the other 50 on the roster. Doesn’t take into account the high dollar positions lowering that average.
S
saret
11mo
I'm working on that type of info. A few days ago, I posted a copy
of a revenue sharing contract. At the request of @AirborneHokie96, I'll post it on this board.
AirborneHokie96 AirborneHokie96
11mo
Programs flush with NIL money will make the numbers work to have depth
bourbonstreet bourbonstreet
11mo
our Rb1's grill is worth mo' than some cars on this MB. think 'bout dat...
Will Stewart Will Stewart
11mo
Uh, none of that is a surprise to me.
As a matter of fact, the numbers are a smidge lower than I expected at a few positions, and a little high at receiver.
Maroon Effect Maroon Effect
11mo
“No booing. They are kids, amateurs wearing YOUR school colors, putting
themselves on the line.” I have heard folks say things to that effect for decades. The implication they are playing for free - just for exposure or for the love of the sport - is certainly not true now. It probably never was, especially if one puts value on education and the college experience, plus whatever was in the McDonald’s bag.
1
1947Sunbowl
11mo
We got just another professional sport league that's it
and go back our universities are billion dollar enterprises as well and these enterprises delivered a wonderful degree that gave many of our careers the foundation for sucessful careers.
B
Brewing_Hokie
11mo
They’ve been pros for a long time…just under the table. You know this merc
Atlee Hokie Atlee Hokie
11mo
They are now pros in every definition of the word.
Since they are pros now, they are fair game for criticism.
Maroon Effect Maroon Effect
11mo
Better than "pros" in some ways. No contractual obligations.
S
saret
11mo
There are some requirements. I posted a copy of
a VT revenue sharing contract yesterday, along with an LoI.
AirborneHokie96 AirborneHokie96
11mo
Did you post on this side of the railroad tracks?
On the free board for those of us that are not subscribers?
S
saret
11mo
I only posted on the subscriber board. I'll post it on this board shortly.
AirborneHokie96 AirborneHokie96
11mo
Correct...because the schools don't want to make them employees...
S
saret
11mo
Making them employees opens up all kind of
responsibility on the universities. The new Virginia law, 1505, was very specific on that. That was done to protect the schools.
J
Jeffroww
11mo
Wearing your school colors for a year or two then will move on to
A different school where the color green comes into affect.
1
1947Sunbowl
11mo
different world and it is not going back
I watched the single a minor league Fredericksburg nationals (nationals) play Fayetteville Woodpeckers (Houston) last night. I saw the no 1 draft pick of he nationals 17 year old play for Fredericksburg. contract 8 Million dollar contract at 17. Kids getting their value for their skills (and with that money) can go back anytime for college. but heck getting 8 figures salaries set you you up for life.
AirborneHokie96 AirborneHokie96
11mo
Just remember students, we are raising YOUR student fees so that players
can get six or 7 figures to play for Virginia Tech. No one cares if you are having to take out student loans to pay for your education at VT OR if you have to work weekends and nights to pay for school and thus, cannot attend sporting events.
BG Hokie BG Hokie
11mo
Supply and demand. I suspect the athletic fee won't even remotely move the
needle of reducing demand for VT. More competitive than ever to get in... The BOV will attack the money from all angles and I'm sure raising this fee will be one of many angles taken...
AirborneHokie96 AirborneHokie96
11mo
Why can't fans use their own checkbooks to fund things?
hokiepro hokiepro
11mo
So what; raise “student activity fees” to cover all their rights to use
Facilities on campus or raise tuition. Whatever…it needs to happen to get us to parity with peer schools If not..the school itself will suffer eventually
GSOHokie01 GSOHokie01
11mo
If VT needs athletics to support academics, we have seriously lost our way.
The tail shouldn’t be wagging the dog.
VTHokie2000 VTHokie2000
11mo
Do regular students have access to the same facilities that the athletes
have access to while they are enrolled at VT? I'm not just talking about their ability to attend athletic events on campus, but the usage of the gym(s), weight room(s), track, nutritionist, tutors, and the other "perks" that come with being an athlete at VT.
AirborneHokie96 AirborneHokie96
11mo
No. Not at all.
VTHokie2000 VTHokie2000
11mo
Exactly which contradicts the "all their rights to use..." part of the
statement. Why should student fees help pay for things when everyone knows regular students will never gain access to them? I think it is a valid question and one I would be asking if I was sending a child off to college.
S
saret
11mo
Into hyperbole again, pro?
Atlee Hokie Atlee Hokie
11mo
One problem. All students have to pay the fee, but ...
... all students can't go to the games. Would you like to pay the fee, but get shut out of entrance to the game?
2
2hhoop3
11mo
It is the lazy way out.......
to hold students hostage for something they may or may not benefit from when adults that are being paid very well are not doing their jobs.
AirborneHokie96 AirborneHokie96
11mo
Their education will not suffer one bit
GSOHokie01 GSOHokie01
11mo
Exactly! And 10 years from now they can sleep at night knowing...
...they are still paying for their fellow student athletes to play ball who are now long gone and could be playing real professional sports, collecting a nice hefty paycheck. Students should not be burdened with the costs of paying for their fellow peers to play ball.
hokiepro hokiepro
11mo
You can say that. It’s your opinion BUT VT students cannot expect to have
Good competitive sports teams to watch if they’re paying smaller fees than all the other peer public schools
Atlee Hokie Atlee Hokie
11mo
What if they don't want sports teams?
They should be forced to pay for them anyway?
BG Hokie BG Hokie
11mo
NOBODY is forced to attend Virginia Tech. Go somewhere else...
S
saret
11mo
You are absolutely right. That's why I'm going to an NSU game, and a
Roanoke College game this year. And, no one is forcing me to attend.
2
2hhoop3
11mo
You can say that. It's your opinion.......
no matter how misguided it might really be.
4
40ozDistrict
11mo
LOL, make it a donation vs a fee and see how many care.
AirborneHokie96 AirborneHokie96
11mo
Yes...give them a choice of a donation like the fans...
S
saret
11mo
Well, maybe we all should have lowered expectations.
BG Hokie BG Hokie
11mo
Right, we shouldn't even entertain raising student athletic fees because a
few holier than thou message board posters who don't understand supply and demand have a strong opinion on this one!
S
saret
11mo
The rise in Student athletic fees has already occurred.
And, I believe, under the fairly recently passed state law, cannot occur again for a few years, with limits on any subsequent increases. I, personally, don't agree with the increase, but I ain't callin' the shots. Either way, it doesn't affect me personally because my kids have already graduated from VT. Those with family members in college (or soon to be) have a very personal viewpoint, and I understand that. There are some on here who would have everyone give everything they have short of bankruptcy to prop up football. As @bourbonstreet and myself have said for a long time, it's easy to spend other people's money. I often ruminate how much these "all-in for football" posters personally contribute. When I'm in a dour mood, I think they don't contribute as much as others, and want the rest of us to give more to prop up/subsidize their desires. Methinks that's why they want to student athletic fees to go higher. From my viewpoint, Whit is and has been in panic mode. He's doing all the easy stuff (increased athletic fees, more money from the BoV, etc.) to avoid making the tough decisions and stay employed until 2029. You can use a lot of words to describe Whit, but courageous ain't one of 'em. He's ignored opening up new revenue streams (charging for all sports, corporate sponsors, new apparel contracts, etc.) while spending like a profligate sailor (apologies to the Navy folks on here). He's outsourced everything with little to no oversight, and abdicated his responsibilities repeatedly. He is, and has been, an empty suit.
HokieAl HokieAl
11mo
Agree. The more I look at VT athletics decisions and actions
the worse it looks. We have consistently made bad decisions for growth, money, spending, hiring, support, and facilities for a very long time. And there is plenty of blame to go around. But Whit is here now and has been here for awhile so he deserves a hefty portion of that blame. Even if VT had oil money and billionaire donors willing to spend it, I'm not confident that it would be spent well. $150-200 million may seem like a lot, but I've been part of programs at work that are much bigger in scale. It's not that hard to be organized, be prepared for multiple scenarios, push hard for funding/resources when you need it, and execute quickly. But it does require the right kind of leadership.
S
saret
11mo
Hear! Hear!
AirborneHokie96 AirborneHokie96
11mo
Hammer Nail
F
FriendofCoal
11mo
I bet half the students don't care.
Just because UVA does something doesn't me VT should.
MP4VT2004 MP4VT2004
11mo
Or, VT could choose to drop down to Div. II and still be competitive.
The problem with that is that it would not be nearly as lucrative, and that wouldn't sit well with the administration. Let's not pretend that higher education is actually all about education these days. It's a huge business, and universities want to maximize their profits. So, pay up, students!
AirborneHokie96 AirborneHokie96
11mo
So the students should be forced to pay for you to be entertained?
GSOHokie01 GSOHokie01
11mo
It's easy to say that when we are no longer students burdened by loans...
...or having to work just to put ourselves through school. "Pay up! Or else!" should not be a message to our student body.
L
likehokies
11mo
Made me laugh.
Yep, they can always take out a bigger loan I guess.
V
VT ChemE 1986
11mo
This!!!
4
40ozDistrict
11mo
Take this sport and shove it, I ain't watching it here no more, lol