All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

M
mancunian OP
Dec 11, 2023 at 10:17 AM ET
Ruminating on final moves...
1) the last battleground between the Big 10 and SEC is Virginia/North Carolina. Do they divide it up like a half-assed Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, or does one conference snatch it all up? 2) ND will never join a conference for football. They're getting enough dough going forward, they have playoff access, its over. If the ACC falls apart some other conference (BE, Big 12) will give them the same kind of deal. In retrospect the ACC's experience with ND is like a guy who dates a stripper, "she'll change for me man, I know it." No she won't. 3) The SEC won't offer any ACC team in their current footprint. The Big 10 has a lot of mouths to feed already, which leads to...see #4. 4) The Big 10 and SEC eventually jettison their weaker members. I could see the Big 10 in particular doing this as they have no discernible ethics or conscience. ** Edited by mancunian at 12/11/2023, 10:23:57 AM

26 Replies

MrBayAreaHokie MrBayAreaHokie
what's the reverse GOR $ ?
O
OrlandoHokie
Sounds like a Tom Selleck commercial waiting to happen
S
Stech
🤣🤣🤣
J
jesuisvtguy
I could see SEC taking Clemson and FSU...
That knocks the Big10 out of the Southeast. The best remaining teams would be Georgia Tech and Miami.
T
Truthahn
LOL for the ND stripper analogy!
I'm imagining a stripper named "Hail Mary", comes out dressed as a nun.
Old Line Hokie Old Line Hokie
Will adding all 4 NC/VA schools as mentioned...
by either the Big 10+8 or SEC be seen as a power move or as a sign of weakness or fear of the other P-2 conference? If UNC, NCSU, UVA and Tech are bundled together in a deal, I think both the Big 10 and SEC have different motives for adding those four. The Big 10 would love to go south an control the entire mid-Atlantic/upper Southeast but it seems like they would only want UNC and UVA and want Clemson, FSU and maybe Ga. Tech. The SEC would want to keep the Big 10 out of their geographic footprint but in order to succeed, I feel they would have to take FSU, Clemson along with 2 to 4 ACC public univeristies from VA and NC. The P-2 compromise would be to let the Big 10 and SEC take one ACC school from each state (NC and VA). I just wonder what a move like taking UNC, NCSU, UVA and Tech as a bundle would be perceived by the P-2 winner and P-2 loser. For example, if the Big 10 made the move, what would the SEC talkingheads be saying? I think the response would be the other P-2 conference (SEC in this case) quickly taking Clemson and FSU. FSU and CU and possibly Miami and maybe Ga. Tech to the Big 10 if the SEC takes the 4 from NC/VA.
O
OrlandoHokie
Grateful that UVA and Tech are sticking together
At least in thought. Time will tell but grateful that the schools want to be a package deal. Hope it works out.
HokieAl HokieAl
Don’t forget there is a key difference between BIG and SEC
This doesn’t get talked about much but there is a reason the BIG gets such a big media contract despite the sports results not living up to the hype. The BIG has a lot of large schools with large enrollments and large alumni groups. Here are some numbers I found online for comparison. The BIG doesn’t have strong and weak schools. They have very large, large, and kind of small schools. And you don’t want to see the ACC comparison. For comparison here is what I have for VT. 37,000 total (30 undergrad, 7 grad). SEC Texas A&M - 73,284 Florida - 60,613 Texas - 51,991 Georgia - 40,118 Alabama - 38,320 LSU - 35,914 Carolina - 35,388 Tennessee - 31,701 Kentucky - 31,536 Auburn - 31,526 Arkansas - 30,936 Missouri - 29,866 Oklahoma - 28,840 Ole Miss - 22,967 State - 22,649 Vandy - 13,796 BIG 10 Ohio State - 61,369 Washington - 60,081 Illinois - 52,331 Minnesota - 52,017 Rutgers - 50,411 Michigan State - 49,695 USC - 49,500 Wisconsin - 47,935 Michigan - 47,907 Penn State - 45,901 UCLA - 45,900 Purdue - 45,869 Indiana - 42,552 Maryland - 40,709 Iowa - 30,448 Nebraska - 25,057 Oregon - 23,202 Northwestern - 22,316 ** Edited by HokieAl at 12/11/2023, 1:33:57 PM
E
EDGEMAN
Is that just the numbers for the main campus, or does it include...
... "satellite campuses" too?
vtdasc90 vtdasc90
That aTm number has to include "satellite" campuses.
3
33laszlo99
That number is College Station, only. Add in the Corpus Christi and
Commerce campuses and they are over 100,000.
HokieAl HokieAl
I don’t know. I grabbed it from a site
And it seems every site has a different count. At a macro level it is close enough to compare schools. But I’d guess that the numbers I posted are not completely accurate for the main campuses in 2023. And I’ll edit to show VT numbers in there also.
E
EDGEMAN
Barely make the top third of the SEC, but well into the bottom third of B1X
E
EDGEMAN
You should have thrown VT's numbers in there to see how we rank
T
tarheelblue
That's only relevant to the extent that it leads to higher TV ratings.
No_Limit_Hokie No_Limit_Hokie
Good research!
T
tarheelblue
Expelling current members who don't want to leave is the hardest part
Because many of the other members voting to expel them will be thinking they might be next to be put on the chopping block. If the B1G wanted to expel teams, I would think that Maryland and Rutgers would be the first to go. There has to be a lot of buyer's remorse over those additions.
MrBayAreaHokie MrBayAreaHokie
really?
I was that the Rutgers/VT game this year. That stadium at Rutgers was full, and gameday vibe was very cool. I would think that translates to $omething $omehow in terms of tv and what not
W
Windows NT
I would love to see Mary back in the ACC and say
adios to Loserville
B
Big12 guy
This is the thinking that got the PAC in trouble. The b12 would take
Louisville tomorrow. They have a basketball brand that some just don't measure up too.
W
Windows NT
big12 got my full support for loserville. They don't belong in the acc
B
Big12 guy
Throw in Pitt Cuse and BC, you got a deal.
B
Big12 guy
Don't worry about UConn, we'll take them too.
HokieAl HokieAl
Maybe not buyers remorse
Depends on what the main drivers were behind the scenes. The BIG got two large markets with lots of cable viewers and lots of alumni. The BIG also got two easy conference wins each year for their top teams. I don’t think the BIG cares at all that RU and MD have not been successful on the field. But that’s just my guess. Now would they pick those schools today if they were not in the BIG? That would be an interesting debate. The markets are still relevant. But maybe the football quality would factor more this time for a different result?
T
tarheelblue
I don't think the TV networks want to pay top dollar for Maryland football
3
33laszlo99
They aren't paying for Maryland FB. They are paying for B1G FB games in
the sixth largest TV market with an opposing B1G fanbase attached. It's worth a bunch of money to advertisers. Maryland was not supposed to be an annual B1G championship contender.