Why not target SMU, Utah and Colorado?
At this point geography is out the window.
** Edited by goldendomer at 7/13/2022, 10:06:32 AM
11 Replies
4y
(In response to this post by goldendomer)
Yes to Utah...No on the other two
(In response to this post by goldendomer)
4y
Set aside any other confusing factors like Grant of rights, geography, or scheduling. A team must be as valuable as the average member of the conference just to be a net even addition. Numbers don't add value, value adds value.
(In response to this post by goldendomer)
4y
And are any of those schools really any better than adding West Virginia, which also makes geographic sense? If we are going to be adding schools that far west, might as well just add Pac-12 schools.
(In response to this post by goldendomer)
4y
(In response to this post by tarheelblue)
4y
shoot for the biggest and best out there...go get Oregon, Washington, Stanford
(In response to this post by tarheelblue)
4y
you bring in ludicrous money to support the resultant travel.
USC/UCLA to the B1G doesn't mean it's smart for just any conference to add anyone of any geography.
(In response to this post by goldendomer)
That'll excite the TV networks!
(In response to this post by goldendomer)
E
EDGEMAN
4y
I think the SEC will be smart, and concentrate on the southeast. Texas to the Atlantic, and not higher than Kentucky. The B1X will need a lot more cash just for their travel budget.
(In response to this post by goldendomer)