All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

jonnyhawk jonnyhawk OP
May 17, 2023 at 07:05 AM ET
VT and the ESPN Effect
If VT joined the SEC...... VT would start getting biased coverage from every ESPN announcer when playing non-SEC teams. VT would start making more money from its ESPN deal per year. VT stories would start showing up on the ESPN sites / Magazines VT recruiting would improve because we could offer kids the chance to play in the mighty (after years of ESPN Hype) SEC VT ESPN coverage would start getting A-List talking heads for Marquee games and would suddenly seem relevant again. VT (especially if we were only ESecPN Hyped school in Virginia) would start landing higher percentages of instate recruits. Due to additional funding, VT Facilities would start improving above and beyond where they are. VT would be hyped in media discussions with talking heads. VT ticket sales would go up due to interesting matchups. The list goes on and on. ESPN is the only game in town. If ESPN is not financially backing you, you simply don't exist in their Enormous Hype Machine. Also, This ESPN Effect is for all sports, NOT just football!! It's the reason ACC basketball is dropping, It's the reason SEC is rising in basketball. It's the reason there were two SEC teams in final four of women's basketball. It's also the reason VT get's almost zero interesting articles on ESPN currently. It's the reason VT gets the worst ESPN TV coverage with bad audio. (You guys think that just happens? it's calculated, planned, and executed by espn crews) Go Hokies! ** Edited by jonnyhawk at 5/17/2023, 7:28:22 AM

28 Replies

Techsupport Techsupport
SEC/B1G needs to morph into college version of AFC/NFC....
Have 2 conferences in the country, break into regional divisions like the NFL. Have ONE media rights contract that's shared across the field.
4
40ozDistrict
Knight Commission with NCFA and NCAA model is the answer. Been out there
for some years now. Seems like no one is aware. Here's a snippert: Under the Commission’s proposal, Division I membership in all sports except FBS football would remain the same, and all schools currently classified in the FBS would remain full NCAA Division I members in sports other than football. At the same time, the Commission’s restructuring proposal would provide a reset opportunity for FBS programs that can no longer afford to compete at the highest level of college football and would prefer to affiliate with the NCAA, instead of the new FBS football organization. In the Commission’s survey, three in five FBS leaders acknowledged that they spend too much on FBS football “to keep up” with other schools.
Techsupport Techsupport
Don't want to see VT "relegated" to the "minors"....
I think you'd see support and attendance dry-up pretty quick, and you'd never see a sold out stadium again.
4
40ozDistrict
If VT can't afford to go the NCFA route then that is the answer. I would
get back into the NCAA version and pretty much ignore the NCFA league. It could go opposite of what you are saying. If 25 - 35 schools are in the NCFA and the rest of FBS in the NCAA version I'm definitely on board with VT in the new NCAA version.
VaTechHokiesACC VaTechHokiesACC
It's going to happen. Just a matter of when.
JRHokie JRHokie
Maybe more than two..But that's ESPN plan..$$$$$$
M
marcbvtgm
And VT would basically be S. Carolina or worse - w/ a smaller stadium
MaryWashGrad MaryWashGrad
As opposed to what Tech has been lately??
If Tech is going to be a semi-doormat or mediocre middle of the pack team in a conference, they might as well be getting paid more $$ for it ** Edited by MaryWashGrad at 5/17/2023, 2:09:55 PM
M
marcbvtgm
The only point was VT can be a player in the ACC with less $$.
More money in the SEC - even a lot more - will be 1 step forward, one or two steps back. Now that may be necessary (probably in fact) to survive, but moving to the SEC will not make VT any more relevant - and quite possibly less relevant.
VaTechHokiesACC VaTechHokiesACC
Other than the Big 10 and SEC, that's the way it's headed
Those two eventually will have college football on lock down.
M
marcbvtgm
Still missing the point…
H
HokieKick`nBack
We are going to be ODU, Liberty or James Madison
If we don't get to p2. We will struggle a couple of years but eventually you hire coaches with experience and reputation. That plus better player pay, facilities and recruiting staff gets talent back to where you land a top qb and off you go. S Carolina had a great year - we should be so fortunate.
VPI63 VPI63
You wrote,”We are going to be ODU”…
The last 2 times we played them at their 30K stadium, we lost. We are a bottom feeder in a conference that is sinking like the Titanic. Beyond our fan base, we have no leverage, except what our politicians can supply. The big elephant in the room that no one seems to be addressing directly is that we are in an arms race we can not possibly win unless we get our 250K living alumni to pony up big time. Good luck with that. I said 3 years ago that we should go to the Ivy League model and just have real student athletes, because we can not win this arms race. This entire conference realignment, M7 looking at their options, is like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Hey, I should get some credit for managing to get two Titanic metaphors into one post. 😎 ** Edited by VPI63 at 5/17/2023, 2:38:32 PM ** Edited by VPI63 at 5/17/2023, 2:40:50 PM
Techsupport Techsupport
In the SEC, revenue bump can allow Hokie Club to convert to player payroll
Techsupport Techsupport
0.00 Gamecock fans would rather be in the ACC. Think about that.
M
marcbvtgm
You're missing the point...but ok.
And if there was ever fanbase whose arrogant self-delusion has resulted in perpetual mediocrity, it's South Carolina's. ** Edited by marcbvtgm at 5/17/2023, 5:36:34 PM
Techsupport Techsupport
Arrogant self-delusion? I'd call it wanting to compete on the big stage...
...and South Carolina has been having a much better time the last couple seasons in the SEC, than we have the easy ACC. We can't even be sure of win against ODU and Liberty anymore. We're irrelevant, and it's likely only going to get worse. You are also making the EXACT same illogical assumption that was made before we entered the ACC. Remember when Bill Brill, and that group was saying we could never compete in the ACC....yeah, because we didn't have acc resources. To each his own, but I have no desire to be a fan of a chicken-little program that doesn't want to compete at the adult table. If w/l record is the only goal, then let's drop down to FCS, because that's where the program is right now anyway. We are a middle pack FCS school. We need more money. We need more exposure. We need better recruiting. We need to be relevant. I absolutely did not miss the point.
M
marcbvtgm
You COMPLETELY missed the point because you are stuck on a narrative.
Techsupport Techsupport
Your rebuttal was crapping on USC fans. Great argument.
H
HOKIE75-79
once, it was shown how much money we would lose vs other SEC schools..
for every home game. Our stadium is 30,000 seats smaller than most SEC teams. Do the math on 6 home games
I
IronBlood
Go ahead an look at the Sun Belt West division. Now imagine that's your
home slate. Does Tech sell out a single game in that conference? Now tell me about how much money we'd lose if we were in the SEC. People don't really see the cliff that VT is hurtling towards. I think there's a pretty good argument for us not playing big boy football anymore - but I doubt very many people would want that.
Techsupport Techsupport
We're already competing against the SEC now, whether we like it or not
Now, they not only have the stadium advantage, but also an even greater media rights advantage. I'd much rather see what VT could do with another $30,000,000 than we have now, and sit at the adult table. We could (indirectly) buy a lot of players with that money. Being meek and passive has always been the VT approach, and as such we've always played the doormat. It has never helped us. ** Edited by Techsupport at 5/17/2023, 11:23:46 AM
V
VPI47
VT’s stadium would expand, I don’t know by how much, but the crowd number
would increase
M
marcbvtgm
No it wouldn't. Huge art of delusion for what moving to the SEC will do.
It very well may be necessary in order to survive, but it will not make VT football significantly more relevant. Being a bigger fish in a bigger pond of bigger fish will not make for a bigger, more passionate fanbase.
J
jarrowsm
VT spent most of the 21st century as ESPN darlings.
Even with 10 tough years, we still shoot straight into the top 25 whenever we string together 4-5 wins in a row. I really wish we could be consistently great, but we are still collecting a fair return on Beamer's success.
khakiblue khakiblue
Think...
it would.
I
IV_Hokie12
It may not. The logistics of getting that many people to Blacksburg
isn't trivial. It isn't close to the population centers of the state so a disproportionate number of people need hotels vs other schools. Hotels are already charging 300-500 a night for game weekends and the town still can't support more hotels.
M
Mercury
You charge 125 a ticket
Then the math works You know for ala it would sell out and all those ala fans ching