Beerman
26,503
Posts
0
Threads
16,214
Likes
Member since:
August 14, 1998
Last post:
05/03/2022 11:25 AM ET
Posting History (1,127)
Football Board
6 mo ago
Contracts aren't worthless. Neither are they unbreakable.
Break a contract, pay a penalty. If there is no penalty, then was there ever really a contract?
Football Board
6 mo ago
Which year, exactly?
Major college sports has been a business longer than you have likely been alive
Football Board
6 mo ago
Of course
Even if a NIL deal is stated as being for multiple years, it's a one year deal. Calling it a multi-year deal just means you're spreading out the cash over a longer term.
Colleges can end the madness anytime the wish to.
The Lounge
6 mo ago
The Lounge
6 mo ago
When you go from "prove that this will be safe" ...
... to "prove this will fail", bad things are bound to happen
The Lounge
6 mo ago
The Lounge
6 mo ago
Meh
All of those same parents ***** and moan about the alternative childcare arrangements they've made, or day they have to take off work, when it turns out that a closure wasn't necessary.
They ALSO ***** and moan when schools aren't closed, and they have trouble getting up the driveway or have to deal with horrific snow day traffic when schools aren't cancelled.
Basically ... miserable gits are going to ***** and moan because *****ing and moaning validates their pain.
The Lounge
6 mo ago
Almost
Football coaches fail. A lot. I feel like the REAL American Dream is to become a TV preacher. They don't even have to deliver anything!
Football Board
6 mo ago
The Lounge
6 mo ago
The Lounge
6 mo ago
Football Board
6 mo ago
That's even assuming they choose voluntary compliance
There's nothing illegal about entering into a NIL deal and not subjecting it to Clearinghouse approval. There is only the possibility that the NCAA finds out about it and tells a school "Stop! Or I'll say stop again..."
Football Board
6 mo ago
Not remotely
It's highly probably that not all of the NIL deals are even NCAA-vetted. Nationally, at least, even if VT has decided to play by the rules.
Football Board
6 mo ago
Football Board
6 mo ago
You lay out their future for them
When you tell a guy it isn't in the cards for him, and that playing time will be hard to come by going forward, if they want to play they'll move on. It helps when the coaching staff works to find them a good landing place.
I don't doubt there are a few guys who don't want to leave VT and will stick around the bottom of the roster being worthwhile practice bodies and emergency depth. That's fine, in sufficiently small numbers, and we will probably never hear a word about it.
Football Board
7 mo ago
It is for sure messy
Made no cleaner by the fact that what (some) fans want and what the powers actually driving the sport want are not particularly the same things.
Football Board
7 mo ago
Congress makes Federal laws
...and Congress can change federal laws. Or create exemptions to them. Title IX is not part of the Constitution, it is not inviolate.
The better question is why should they? Using sham amateurism and non-profit status to shield profits is, and has always been, a crock of ****. I fail to understand why Congress should do anything to preserve that just because some number of college sports fans want to preserve a fantasy.
Football Board
7 mo ago
Of course they can
Congress passes laws that supersede prior laws all the time. They also pass laws that affect big business vs. small business differently all the time.
Football Board
7 mo ago
Yep the GA had to pass a law, I believe...
...if I'm not mistaken the GA passed a law putting limits on how much and/or how rapidly state schools could increase student fees, in response to what JMU did
Football Board
7 mo ago
The Lounge
7 mo ago
The Lounge
7 mo ago
Football Board
7 mo ago
Cool. Hasn't coached a single game yet and already...
...he can't win the big one again. lol. get a grip
Football Board
7 mo ago
Meh
The Big Business aspect is not what what divorced fan expectations from reality. College football fans have had a tenuous grip on reality for decades. The present dollars are just a convenient excuse.
Football Board
7 mo ago
Coach is on a five year contract
If, in five years, the always reasonable fan base is somehow tired of empty 10-win seasons then nothing has us tethered to the James Franklin ship any longer
Football Board
7 mo ago
Nah. It's just the Franklin doubters refocusing their energy
Now that Franklin is here, all the moaning about "but he can't win the big game" is transferring to the decisions he's making about his staff. Same ****, different day is all.
Football Board
7 mo ago
Depends on the school they end up at
And some of those late career transfers have already completed their undergrad already anyway
** Edited by Beerman at 12/9/2025, 10:25:50 AM
The Lounge
7 mo ago
It's an IPTV service
First of all you DO have things to lose...but we'll come back to that
This is an IPTV service. There are lots of them out there. They are not, strictly speaking, entirely legal. They operate in countries that have looser licensing laws (or don't enforce them) and then stream pirated content out over the internet. There are really only about half-a-dozen providers, but dozens of other shady operations resell those handful of original services.
There is some variation from one provider to the next as far as what content is available but they pretty much all have the popular stuff.
Don't commit to a plan. If you try them (or any IPTV service) purchase it one month at a time. Be prepared for it to disappear with no notice, and shop around for your next service.
The upside is literally thousands of channels for less than $20 a month. It's kind of glorious.
The risks:
1) It's not really legal. Mostly that's between you and your God, except that it might be against your ISP's Terms of Service to stream unlicensed content, and if they care they might boot you. Mostly they don't. And you can probably get around it with a VPN anyway.
2) You're buying a sketchy product from a sketchy foreign vendor over the internet. Be VERY careful how you apply payment.
Football Board
8 mo ago
It certainly should NOT be Ohio State
...but it would be something else if we played tOSU someday soon and Franklin beat them
Football Board
8 mo ago
Unless you're giving megabucks it probably doesn't matter a whole lot
...and if you ARE giving megabucks, I'd suggest that the athletic department will be more than happy to talk to you about it
The Lounge
8 mo ago
That's the big question
950 would require sticking around another year. 1000? One or two after that. All assuming he doesn't slow down much.
I have a bad feeling that he's going to hang it up tho. The jersey-trading tour he seems to be on with other teams' stars this season isn't giving me good vibes.
Football Board
8 mo ago
The roster limits recently changed
85 scholarships > 105 and no longer a 25-new-per-year means there's a lot of suction up to the top schools willing to spend. That won't be every year, but it will be for a couple at least.
Schools that are less financially able are going to be building teams by portaling in I-AA performers and larger I-A castoffs.
Football Board
8 mo ago
I don't know about Dook, but...
UVA's success is largely due to portal acquisitions. They may not worry too much about recruiting at this stage.
Football Board
8 mo ago
I don't know how true any of that is, but ...
The more true that is, the more likely it is that VT has explicitly given Franklin the things he only thought that he had at PSU.
Football Board
8 mo ago
We do have a bit of a first year bump
Franklin can offer these kids some opportunities, today, that hopefully won't be around in coming years once the roster has some more talent on it
Football Board
8 mo ago
Points are simply cumulative, are they not?
Larger class = more points = higher rank
So if you want to win the off-season, which has been a perennial source of pride amongst folks who's teams don't win during the actual season, then sign lots of guys.
Football Board
8 mo ago
Football Board
8 mo ago
Football Board
8 mo ago