8 Replies
S
Stech
1y
says they were the only one in South Carolina that didn’t. I am surprised at that with their emphasis on athletics, would have thought they were the first to do it.
(In response to this post by Will Stewart)
1y
students an athletic fee. That being said, the administration of that school does support the athletic program in other ways, so sometimes, it's just how they slice the pie.
Clemson for instance, could provide monetary support with the tuition they now collect, but they separate the athletic department expenditures out from the general budget - and as most know, schools have been telling the athletic department for decades that they are on their own.
One of the biggest expenses the athletic department has, are the scholarships they provide, and pay the school. I don't know the different state laws or mandates, but it seems to me, that if athletics is advantageous to a university (it can be argued either way), then administrative support needs to up their game - and maybe stop taking money from their athletic departments in tuition payments for those students representing the university.
** Edited by Big12 guy at 10/19/2024, 12:28:53 PM
(In response to this post by Stech)
E
EDGEMAN
1y
Have a feeling that most of the part time students are probably part time because they can't afford to be full time students.
(In response to this post by Will Stewart)
1y
(In response to this post by EDGEMAN)
1y
of time restraints. They simply can't be full-time workers and full-time students (and potentially partners and/or parents) concurrently.
And I think fees are typically pro-rated with part-time status, just like tuition.
(In response to this post by EDGEMAN)