All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Old Line Hokie Old Line Hokie OP
Sep 14, 2023 at 11:58 PM ET
Do Cal, Stanford and SMU have existing network studios for the ACCN?
I assume that Cal and Stanford already have network studios on campus unless the Pac-12 Network didn't require them for every member school like the ACC and SEC does. Being in the American Athletic Conference, I'm guessing SMU will have to build one. There might be a temporary studio available in Dallas????

23 Replies

H
HOO86
Unless it changed recently PAC12 Networks rolled the trucks
They didn't require on campus Control Rooms and Studios. They roll the trucks and have multiple studios in their San Francisco Control Center. I was reading somewhere where they may have moved the San Francisco studios out of San Francisco, but I haven't seen anything suggesting that they have required the schools to build their own that cuts down on use of the trucks. I would doubt that SMU has any of this.
Link: link
F
Fort Lauderdale Hokie
Cal and Stanford could teach us about media entertainment
They are bulwarks of the Hollywood entertainment industry along with the likes of UCLA, USC, et al. I don't think we have any worries about the Cal schools and television.
Tuckahokie Tuckahokie
I have a feeling SMU's will be state of the art and palatial
1
132863Hokie
If not, they have a year to set it up.
B
Big12 guy
The ACC doesn't have to be worried about SMU's ability and commitment
to be a top notch football program, with all the bells and whistles. They tend to put their money where their mouth is, and they will be competitive in every aspect.
M
Millpoint
No disrespect intended
But why haven’t they been good in the American? I realize more $ will be spent once in ACC. Just curious. I don’t think they will do much as long as FSU, Clemson and Miami are around.
B
Big12 guy
Recruiting in the G5 is different than recruiting in the P5. (That simple)
M
Millpoint
You guys may be right
But I think they will continue to suck.
B
BAMRising
Their nil deals alone should give them the opportunity
To close any "competitiveness" deficit pretty quickly. If they were a stock, I'd be buying.
V
VT ChemE 1986
I am willing to bet they leave VT in the dust
L
LonghornHokie
Not that hard to do right now, TBH
V
VT ChemE 1986
B
** Edited by VT ChemE 1986 at 9/15/2023, 4:20:37 PM
H
Hardcore_Hokie
The Death Penalty and conference irrelevance.
T
Truthahn
Maybe because the transfer portal is only 2 years old?
They are paying all of their football and basketball players at least $36K per year. I assume that is higher than most schools. Now that they are in even footing with the B12, I'd expect them to do at least as well as them in recruiting and the portal. Hopefully they will overperform as a member of the ACC, that is be in the top half of the conference in football.
CrystalCoveHokie CrystalCoveHokie
Being in P5 conference will substantially boost SMU’s recruiting
HokieAl HokieAl
Yup, they will now have a confirmed path to the playoffs each year
That just does not exist at the G5 level. Even with the expanded playoff, the G5 teams will need to have near perfect seasons to maybe make it. Much easier access in the ACC. Which means they are now going to have no barriers and can sell the vision of playoff level football.
B
Big12 guy
Those that have never been in the G% understand this. It's why teams are
virtually paying for the opportunity to be in the "P5".
Victor Tango Victor Tango
I wonder if they will add baseball?
They don't appear to have a AAC team, maybe club only? Seems odd for a warm weather school in a state with a history of very good baseball schools. SMU won the following AAC championships the past two years: Men's Swimming, Men's Tennis, Women's Golf, Women's Rowing. They have a lot of work to do in basketball on both sides, and softball.
B
Big12 guy
They could easily expand their facilities to add a baseball team. They
would have too make that commitment to women's sports as well. Given how much media money they will be receiving, it's my guess they will focus on their football and basketball teams. They have a ways to go to be ACC competitive, but as we are seeing with Colorado, it just takes the planets lining up.
T
Truthahn
I don't see a place to put a baseball field on their campus.
H
HOO86
SMU played baseball at Reverchon Park in Dallas before.
That is a facility owned by the City of Dallas, and it is still there. I think to add baseball they would also need to add Softball. If they wanted to build stadiums for those, they'd need to use some of the green space on the east side of the campus. They discontinued baseball in 1980. College baseball and softball are bigger deals today than in the 1970s. So they might be interested. To add lacrosse, they wouldn't need facilities. Use the soccer fields. They are now joining a league in the ACC that competes very well in all four of the spring sports. And ESPN and the ACC network love showing all four. The easiest adds would be lacrosse because they don't need stadiums, just locker rooms. But Texas as a state is probably bigger on baseball/softball. Texas-Austin, Dallas Baptist, TCU, and Rice all have good baseball. So baseball is all around SMU. ** Edited by HOO86 at 9/16/2023, 9:44:56 AM
S
Sunsetunderground
According to this article SMU already has a lacrosse field with lockerooms
Link: Smu
B
Big12 guy
Maybe not then, It appears they might like soccer better.