The sad part about all of this is that the ACC is a great conference...
It is where we always wanted to be. The rivalries we have are great in Fball, Bball etc. I have no interest in the BIG and honestly, I don't understand why they get so much $. Other than Oh St. and Mich. I think most of that conference is pretty blaaahhh... The SEC would be intriguing by getting to play Florida, Georgia, Bammer, Tenn. etc. but we would be getting our arses handed to us most times. These idiots that run the BIG and SEC just can't leave well enough alone. Please leave the ACC out of your $ grab and let us continue to enjoy the conference we love.
20 Replies
4y
(In response to this post by VPIVIP95)
S
Stech
4y
(In response to this post by VPIVIP95)
4y
In trouble
(In response to this post by VPIVIP95)
4y
Right now UVa and UNC and maybe GT. The new schedule will allow NCSU, Clemson and FSU to likely develop. JMO
(In response to this post by NokieHokie)
4y
On this big time. The ACC seems to be clueless and tone def when it comes to creating compelling content to sell
(In response to this post by 133743Hokie)
Disagree, they got something right for a change
(In response to this post by 133193Hokie)
4y
People get excited about Big 10 football. If more people got excited about ACC football, we could get a better media deal without actually improving the teams, or adding Elite teams. It's about viewership and excitement. Big 10 has simply done a better job of marketing itself. If the ACC cannot add better teams, it can still do something. Hire elite marketers to market the conference. The ACC has a great geographic footprint, lots of potential viewers, the conference needs to sell itself to these viewers. We don't need Notre Dame, we need sales people to convince people to embrace the local product. We have the population. Use the current discontent with the state of college athletics to our favor. Promote, tradition, regional matchups, colleges concerned about academics,. "this is real college football, not a semi pro league".
** Edited by wwhokie1 at 7/8/2022, 11:38:44 AM
(In response to this post by VPIVIP95)
M
Marooned
4y
It’s not success related. It’s eyeballs.
Where I get excited about the B12 is that they have the most opportunity to expand in that regard; and the sea anchor that was UT and its LHN are not holding them back.
(In response to this post by wwhokie1)
4y
incumbent upon all programs to improve football in all aspects and it can be done within the current framework.
(In response to this post by wwhokie1)
4y
(In response to this post by 133743Hokie)
4y
the smallest BIG school is still bigger than 7 of the ACC schools. They have the eyeballs to justify the bigger media contracts. That is something the ACC will never have. The ACC may have good schools and good teams, but it will never have the same number of fans.
Total student population of conferences:
BIG 567k
SEC 478k
PAC 473k
ACC 384k
B12 279k
(In response to this post by wwhokie1)
4y
And for good reason. They have a strong history, and many fans that are not alumni. That is easy to sell. I am not saying that ACC teams can become what Notre Dame is without the Notre Dame history.
My point is that Notre Dame is a big name not because of their large student or alumni size. The problem with the ACC and ACC schools is that we think our viewership and fans will come only or mostly from our alumni. That is wrong. You must sell your program to the community and region. That is what Frank Beamer accomplished at VT. Winning helped a lot with that. But VT's fan base grew because people in Southwest Virginia who had no connection with VT became fans.
Many people I grew up around who never watched VT sports or even rarely watched college football, became VT fans under Beamer. Certainly, a lot of that was a result of winning. But my point is that the size of the audience is not limited to the alumni base. But it was more than winning. It was Beamer selling the program to the community, making it synonomous with the region. Prior to Beamer most people in southwest Virginia and other parts of Virginia were fans of other schools. That changed without that population attending VT.
When I grew up in the region, everyone was passionate about ACC basketball, it was almost a religion like SEC football is a religion in SEC country. Success make that easier. Marketing makes it possible. Many of the ACC basektball fans never attended an ACC school. It was a regional thing. And then it grew beyond the region. We need to escape the mentality of ACC is limited by small school size and start promoting to people throughout our footprint. Do things to build up passion and rivalries, grow passion, get the public excited about ACC football. Make them feel that if they live on the East Coast then ACC football is their birthrite. They are part of it.
I see no real effort, or at least no good campaign to promote the ACC. Look at the difference the Drive for 25 made. The ACC needs a comparable marketing campaign to promote ACC football in its Geographic footprint. A really good advertising person could accomplish that. Most advertising is just mediocre. We need something bold. Something to convince people that if they watch college football and live on the East Coast, that their loyalities should be with the ACC. Because the ACC is their conference. If we market just to ACC alumni then we are limited. Go after college football fans. Bring in new fans, don't just market to ACC fans. Most of the ACC's marketing is to people already connected to the ACC. And we are doing a poor job motivating those people.
Better marketing. Build excitement. Promote rivalries, Build new rivalries. Get creative. If the ACC is going to thrive, that is a requirement. Right now the mood around the ACC is "Dead Man Walking". And so everyone wants out. The audience is out there in our markets, they are just watching the SEC or Big 10. They are living in ACC country and watching other conferences just like SW Virginia used to be a mixed bag of college football fans, until Beamer made it solidly VT country. The ACC needs to make ACC territory truly ACC country. The ACC has a lot to promote. Yes, the SEC has been clearly superior in football, but the BIG 10 has not been so clearly superior lately. So, what is the difference between the BIG 10 and the ACC - public perception. Marketing aims to change perception. The ACC needs to sell itself, and they have many passionate thousands of fans that could be enlisted to help.
** Edited by wwhokie1 at 7/8/2022, 3:36:22 PM
(In response to this post by HokieAl)
4y
This is nearly five years old, but the numbers probably haven't changed much, if at all.
Interesting that Cal-Berkley is in the top 15....
(In response to this post by HokieAl)
4y
number of living alumni as the ACC. When you dig deeper, people that live in Big Ten states, or are from those states follow those Big Ten teams. Their fanbase dwarfs the ACC's. It's not even close. They've led the nation in basketball attendance for more than 40 years. Watch some of their non-revs on the BTN, and they draw. Even volleyball has dedicated arenas. It's the majors vs the minors as far as fan interest.
(In response to this post by HokieAl)
E
EDGEMAN
4y
Large public universities will always have very large fan bases. Sands is growing VT into B1X size.
(In response to this post by reestuart)
V
vtka93
4y
people want to watch. the ACC needs to figure out a way to make more people want to watch. or add more teams that people want to watch (as long as they increase the value of your league)
(In response to this post by wwhokie1)