All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

RTFC
Joined: 08/08/2003
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 6,316
Subscriber

Ok, a stream of conciseness not fully thought thru answer, but

Most players are just starting their "careers", almost any HC has been at it a while. College players are in the "stepping stone" place to the next level - same as coaches at smaller colleges. Most every industry has the "pay your dues" period early in one's career. When the "average" college football player in this period is making as much or more than many of the average fans watching - AND those fans are being asked to donate to pay them more - it rubs them the wrong way. People compare where they were at that time in their life - many, many people would have gone through what college athletes go through just for the fun of it - they just didn't have the talent. (and I'm not saying today's college athlete has a cake walk of responsibilities - there is considerable time commitment) but to play sports on a college team and get your school paid for would be a dream come true - whether pro sports worked out or not. Living a typical coaches life - not so much for many. As a HC probably in your 40s, you likely started with low/no pay internships, bounced around every couple years for the last 15-20 years, have poor job security, probably now have children/family issues, weekend work, long hours - I'm not crying a river here, it can be a good life - but someone getting compensated well for this type of work at this stage of life isn't unusual. So seeing 18-21 year-olds getting paid very well for what I would have done at that age for much less - if I had the talent - just seems different. Not sure I would have taken a HC job in my 40's - even if qualified - unless I was compensated like they are. Now I'm a huge free market guy - and the market has changed - college athletes are in more demand and the "rules" now let them get compensated accordingly. The current "rules" for players don't include number of years, buyout amounts, yearly increases, performance bonuses (why is that taboo for players but not coaches) etc. so for me it is not so much that they are getting compensated - even whatever the market amount is - it is the lack of structure and the constant pleading to me as a fan to fund more of that, that is driving me away from the sport.
Posted: 04/17/2024 at 02:53 PM ET
(In response to this post by Stech)

Thread Replies (41)

Full Thread →
Not sure if serious
harlote101 04/16/24 06:30 AM ET
You cannot fix this problem by throwing more money at it. Some version of
wwhokie1 04/16/24 03:08 PM ET
NIL contracts could include restrictions on movement. That will slow the
33laszlo99 04/16/24 06:04 PM ET
This is coming but more and more I am going.
VTCALS72 04/16/24 07:19 AM ET
Watch VT's college softball...
jesuisvtguy 04/16/24 05:57 PM ET
Question, why weren’t people outraged more over head coaches making 10Mil
Stech 04/16/24 08:19 AM ET
Ok, a stream of conciseness not fully thought thru answer, but
RTFC 04/17/24 02:53 PM ET
Easy
VPI 1924 04/16/24 05:26 PM ET
Apples and Oranges. Every coach doesn't become a free agent at the end of
wwhokie1 04/16/24 03:22 PM ET
Your entire premise is wrong, no one is outraged that players are paid
Vienna_Hokie 04/16/24 02:00 PM ET
You come out swinging for no reason, I didn’t even say I thought that way.
Stech 04/16/24 02:57 PM ET
I think I agree with both of you
fsghokie 04/16/24 03:29 PM ET
I do have a slight problem with you calling the NCAA "gutless." Given that
VTHokie2000 04/16/24 06:19 PM ET
Idk, enforce anything consistently in the past 30+ years?
fsghokie 04/16/24 07:29 PM ET
Your jail analogy is flawed though because the schools have the power to
VTHokie2000 04/17/24 07:33 PM ET
Not really the Presidents are the puppet master
VTCALS72 04/16/24 10:30 PM ET
Ok … I disagree **
fsghokie 04/16/24 10:53 PM ET
There's plenty of outrage to go around
Vippie1 04/16/24 01:40 PM ET
Another point to consider, this is a VT message board
HokieNoVA 04/16/24 12:41 PM ET
that was probably always true though
MrBayAreaHokie 04/16/24 12:49 PM ET
I’ve always thought it was ridiculous. Outraged? I don’t care enough **
CrystalCoveHokie 04/16/24 12:32 PM ET
Since I am only me and can only speak for me, there is no way any one
VTCALS72 04/16/24 12:18 PM ET
Not me. I am far more bothered by permissive transfer guidelines than NIL $
Maroon Baboon 04/16/24 12:15 PM ET
Until fairly recently, it was just one "free" transfer
Pylons 04/16/24 05:13 PM ET
If they haven't already said so, the courts will eventually say that
33laszlo99 04/16/24 05:55 PM ET
I wasn't aware of that. If so, the courts have their fair share in ruining
Maroon Baboon 04/16/24 05:19 PM ET
I don't think the fight is over,
Pylons 04/16/24 05:28 PM ET
With that rationale, athletes should be able to change teams at halftime.
Maroon Baboon 04/16/24 05:33 PM ET
Credit hours should be tied to transfer
Big12 guy 04/16/24 04:13 PM ET
That would be a good idea IF the athletes were in fact students
VTCALS72 04/16/24 10:33 PM ET
Be careful my Big 12 friend
VPI 1924 04/16/24 05:34 PM ET
It's a good hill to die on.
Big12 guy 04/16/24 07:49 PM ET
Not true in a lot of cases.
RJHokie 04/16/24 05:45 PM ET
I understand your point....
Old Line Hokie 04/16/24 11:43 AM ET
I think that mischaracterizes some things
Pylons 04/16/24 11:25 AM ET
If the players were employees with contracts making $50k/year then
HokieNoVA 04/16/24 10:47 AM ET
In every industry there are those who get upset when the help wants to get
hokeyhokie 04/16/24 10:45 AM ET
Easy answer,
cricket77 04/16/24 09:47 AM ET
Agree….But directly or indirectly we still pay toward this ridiculousness **
CrystalCoveHokie 04/16/24 12:34 PM ET
Wish I knew the answer to your question.
Hokester 04/16/24 09:34 AM ET
Depending on the State, most head coaches
Big12 guy 04/16/24 09:16 AM ET
PART**
harlote101 04/16/24 06:32 AM ET