R
Joined:
12/01/2024
Posts:
935
Likes:
574
My take
1. As I said, the 14-team playoff works well for the P2 because their champs will get byes, and they don’t want to devalue their conference championship games. That’s why the 16 team playoff is unlikely in my view.
2. Not sure about a conference selection committee. I think each conference will choose the AQ teams they are sending. Most likely, I think they’ll use conference standings with complicated tiebreaker rules.
3. Non P2 conferences don’t have much leverage here. Let’s say the ACC boycotts the CFP changes and tries to start a new non-P2 playoff instead. What would the Big 12 do? They’d have two choices:
- Option 1: Join the ACC in the non-P2 playoff. This would likely generate a lot less money.
- Option 2: Join the P2 and send a couple of teams to the P2 playoff. This would likely bring in more money and cut the ACC out of the national picture.
You know which option Yormark would choose.
4. In my opinion, the only credible threat the ACC or non-P2 conferences can make is potential antitrust litigation. At least, this may lead to change the language and they may say the “top two” conferences get four bids and the third and fourth conferences get two bids, instead of specifying conference names.
Thread Replies (24)
Josh Pate, likely no change in 2025 PO seeding, 4-4-2-2-1-1 likely for 26.
-- Stech
Feb 21, 2025 at 07:29 PM ET
Stech
•
02/21/25 07:29 PM ET
The ACC has no such option. **
-- Big12 guy
Feb 22, 2025 at 06:47 PM ET
Big12 guy
•
02/22/25 06:47 PM ET
To make any decision against the P2 without checking with
-- Big12 guy
Feb 22, 2025 at 08:22 PM ET
Big12 guy
•
02/22/25 08:22 PM ET
Going against the P2 is a technically possible but unrealistic option
-- RandomAsianGuy
Feb 22, 2025 at 09:51 PM ET
RandomAsianGuy
•
02/22/25 09:51 PM ET
I agree with your last statement, but to be clear,
-- Big12 guy
Feb 23, 2025 at 06:20 AM ET
Big12 guy
•
02/23/25 06:20 AM ET
That’s right, P2 will grab what they want, and eventually break off 🏈🏀4💵
-- Stech
Feb 23, 2025 at 11:34 AM ET
Stech
•
02/23/25 11:34 AM ET
We don't have the option of a timetable either
-- VTCALS72
Feb 24, 2025 at 08:29 AM ET
VTCALS72
•
02/24/25 08:29 AM ET
I'm with you on that. keep in mind, that I am an
-- Big12 guy
Feb 23, 2025 at 04:15 PM ET
Big12 guy
•
02/23/25 04:15 PM ET
Just a comment on the media part of that.
-- VTCALS72
Feb 24, 2025 at 08:37 AM ET
VTCALS72
•
02/24/25 08:37 AM ET
All that is well and good........
-- 2hhoop3
Feb 23, 2025 at 04:20 PM ET
2hhoop3
•
02/23/25 04:20 PM ET
I don't think the paying player genie will ever be
-- Big12 guy
Feb 23, 2025 at 04:32 PM ET
Big12 guy
•
02/23/25 04:32 PM ET
Do not disagree with that either......
-- 2hhoop3
Feb 23, 2025 at 04:38 PM ET
2hhoop3
•
02/23/25 04:38 PM ET
Think of all of the kids playing at the FCS level that play
-- Big12 guy
Feb 23, 2025 at 04:49 PM ET
Big12 guy
•
02/23/25 04:49 PM ET
AGREE. Maybe GW will field a team. **
-- VPI 1924
Feb 23, 2025 at 12:36 PM ET
VPI 1924
•
02/23/25 12:36 PM ET
Their biggest impediment at this point is ESPN
-- PadrosWindup
Feb 22, 2025 at 04:32 PM ET
PadrosWindup
•
02/22/25 04:32 PM ET
If each of the P4 went to 18 teams, it could work well in the long run.
-- hokieZ71
Feb 22, 2025 at 09:12 AM ET
hokieZ71
•
02/22/25 09:12 AM ET
do you honestly think a P4 really exist anymore? **
-- VTCALS72
Feb 24, 2025 at 08:41 AM ET
VTCALS72
•
02/24/25 08:41 AM ET
A couple questions regarding your proposal.
-- VTHokie2000
Feb 22, 2025 at 09:27 AM ET
VTHokie2000
•
02/22/25 09:27 AM ET
#1. Exactly, for football. But it matters for other sports.
-- hokieZ71
Feb 22, 2025 at 10:28 AM ET
hokieZ71
•
02/22/25 10:28 AM ET
I doubt you could come up with a strong enough sales pitch to convince VT
-- VTHokie2000
Feb 22, 2025 at 11:16 AM ET
VTHokie2000
•
02/22/25 11:16 AM ET
What the heck? Why would that happen?**
-- hokieZ71
Feb 22, 2025 at 12:42 PM ET
hokieZ71
•
02/22/25 12:42 PM ET
As I stated previously it would happen because the ACC wanted to make sure
-- VTHokie2000
Feb 22, 2025 at 04:17 PM ET
VTHokie2000
•
02/22/25 04:17 PM ET