All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

S
Joined: 02/16/2001
Posts: 41,763
Likes: 24,052
Lifetime

Josh Pate, likely no change in 2025 PO seeding, 4-4-2-2-1-1 likely for 26.

* There still could be 16, but not talked about much, so I am guessing probably not since the P2 are against it. *SEC probably stays at 8 games *Not much need for a selection committee in 26 and beyond at the National level because of Auto Bids *You could easily see a conference selection committee in the P2 and T2 because teams don't play the same amount of ranked teams even if they are in the same Conference. One team could play 5 top 25 and one could play 1 top 25 in the same conference. * Said since there is no College Football Commissioner every commissioner is only out for their own conference, everything is decided by who has the power. (I think that Jim "Dame" Phillips is out for ND and then the ACC, but rest don't have anyone, but themselves they care about especially at the P4 level) *Lots of concern from others that Auto Bids will decrease ratings, but who knows until they do it. (We do know by actions the P2 don't care about that) Me now, I have loved college football my whole life, but I am more and more just want to support and follow the FCS level and down. 98% of the college players will not play in the NFL, and those that do, almost all of them will be broke in 5 years. As a farmer friend of mine used to say, "Pigs get Fat, but Hogs get Slaughtered." IMHO the top tier are Hogs, just like they were in the early 2000's in NASCAR. How did that work out for them? PS Josh is not advocating for this, but he thinks this is where it is going and with the current power structure is the best we can do now. If so, I find it incredibly sad, but maybe that's just me. ** Edited by Stech at 2/21/2025, 7:35:03 PM
Posted: 02/21/2025 at 07:29 PM ET

Thread Replies (24)

Full Thread →
Josh Pate, likely no change in 2025 PO seeding, 4-4-2-2-1-1 likely for 26.
Stech 02/21/25 07:29 PM ET
My take
RandomAsianGuy 02/22/25 05:05 PM ET
The ACC has no such option. **
Big12 guy 02/22/25 06:47 PM ET
What option?**
RandomAsianGuy 02/22/25 08:08 PM ET
To make any decision against the P2 without checking with
Big12 guy 02/22/25 08:22 PM ET
agree**
VTCALS72 02/24/25 08:21 AM ET
Going against the P2 is a technically possible but unrealistic option
RandomAsianGuy 02/22/25 09:51 PM ET
I agree with your last statement, but to be clear,
Big12 guy 02/23/25 06:20 AM ET
That’s right, P2 will grab what they want, and eventually break off 🏈🏀4💵
Stech 02/23/25 11:34 AM ET
We don't have the option of a timetable either
VTCALS72 02/24/25 08:29 AM ET
I'm with you on that. keep in mind, that I am an
Big12 guy 02/23/25 04:15 PM ET
Just a comment on the media part of that.
VTCALS72 02/24/25 08:37 AM ET
All that is well and good........
2hhoop3 02/23/25 04:20 PM ET
I don't think the paying player genie will ever be
Big12 guy 02/23/25 04:32 PM ET
Do not disagree with that either......
2hhoop3 02/23/25 04:38 PM ET
Think of all of the kids playing at the FCS level that play
Big12 guy 02/23/25 04:49 PM ET
AGREE. Maybe GW will field a team. **
VPI 1924 02/23/25 12:36 PM ET
Their biggest impediment at this point is ESPN
PadrosWindup 02/22/25 04:32 PM ET
If each of the P4 went to 18 teams, it could work well in the long run.
hokieZ71 02/22/25 09:12 AM ET
do you honestly think a P4 really exist anymore? **
VTCALS72 02/24/25 08:41 AM ET
A couple questions regarding your proposal.
VTHokie2000 02/22/25 09:27 AM ET
#1. Exactly, for football. But it matters for other sports.
hokieZ71 02/22/25 10:28 AM ET
I doubt you could come up with a strong enough sales pitch to convince VT
VTHokie2000 02/22/25 11:16 AM ET
What the heck? Why would that happen?**
hokieZ71 02/22/25 12:42 PM ET
As I stated previously it would happen because the ACC wanted to make sure
VTHokie2000 02/22/25 04:17 PM ET