A released document of what the Big 10 showed
what a 24 team playoff would have looked like in 2025. Keep in mind that the ACC just had an off year.
I'm all in on a 24 team playoff, but understand many are not. (linked below)
** Edited by Big12 guy at 2/13/2026, 1:25:24 PM
Link:
24 team playoff
12 Replies
5mo
(In response to this post by Big12 guy)
5mo
at the table. If the goal is for the P2s to get a minimum of 8 teams each in a 24-team field, then they might as well have their own tournament.
(In response to this post by Maroon Baboon)
5mo
only way the to get matchups with the "blue bloods", and make them win it on the field. The top teams of the BIG and SEC will always get in, and last year, a 3 loss SEC school got in.
With the top 8 getting a bye, and a home game to boot, I'm all in. The B12 championship game cost the conference a bid, and the ACC championship game didn't matter. Replace those games with the first round of a 24 team playoff, and those home games on campus will be a lot more fun to watch.
(In response to this post by RandomAsianGuy)
S
Stech
5mo
except Conference Championship bids feels like unprofessional wrestling, it’s rigged.
(In response to this post by Big12 guy)
5mo
The BIG proposal is overall simple and logical. They just took the top 24 teams according to the playoff ranking, and did the brackets based on seeding (same as NCAA tournament, e.g., lowest ranked vs highest ranked).
Nothing is particularly unique about it other than being more teams and having 8 teams with a bye. Everything they have listed has appeared in at least one of the “what if” options posted on this board over the past two years. In fact it is so simple that I think we moved past this kind of basic model a very long time ago.
(In response to this post by Big12 guy)
5mo
"the Big Ten is clearly wanting to provide a seat at the table for everyone, not a Super League conf." is a naive fool. Altruism is no where to be found within the P2.
(In response to this post by Big12 guy)
5mo
...because they know they need the fanbases of the non-P2 teams to tune in. Over time, I don't think a "super league" would draw enough viewership to sustain the lucrative TV deals the P2 teams need to sustain the crazy amounts of money being spent on football and basketball, so I think they need to present a system that doesn't completely alienate 75% of college football fans. I'm sure the spots for non-P2 teams will be minimal, and the deck will forever be stacked against non-P2 teams, but the P2 will be able to claim they have not excluded anyone.
(In response to this post by RVAHokie05)
S
Stech
5mo
broadcast playoff games now they are so successful. 24 teams playing would get them in the College Football Playoff broadcasting business.
Like Deep Throat said (Mark Felt), follow the money!!
(In response to this post by MP4VT2004)
S
Stech
5mo
and to run it. I purposefully didn’t say the SEC, because Sankey will leave some lower tier SEC schools behind and poach some B1G teams. Last year this time the P2 worked together with ESPN and Fox’s support to get majority control of the playoff. IMHO now the B1G has realized Sankey wants the P1 with him or one of his guys to eventually run it. The 24 playoff proposal by the B1G IMHO is to counter that. Keep an eye on how many P2 like USC-w and Michigan start saying they don’t want to sign GOR extensions. Each school that plays in the P1, if it happens, could get their own regular season TV deal like ND. Then you also get the playoff money like ND gets. More money more money more money!!! Or they could work together to get an NFL level deal, either way, it’s about more 💵💵💵💵
If a P1 happens, expect ~32 teams like Saban keeps saying, by the way, ever wonder why ESPN keeps saying Saban should run all of this? Can you say P1 Commissioner is Nick Saban? 🤷♂️
** Edited by Stech at 2/14/2026, 9:05:13 AM
(In response to this post by RVAHokie05)