PAC 12 back to a power conference
The PAC 12 is going to merge with the Mountain West by next summer. Which MWC teams make the merge with Washington State and Oregon State is open for debate. But the new league is going to push for immediate return of power status. Basically, more G5 schools looking for better inclusion.
What that means is that Cal, Stanford and SMU could have yet another big decision to make. Guess that also depends on the status of the ACC. Seemingly all intertwined.
22 Replies
First, let's get rid of the term "power conference".
There are layers to this. Not "power conference" and "non power conference."
1. Power Federations, SEC and B1G
2. Waning ex-P5s, ACC and Big XII
3. Upper level G5s, AAC and MWC (and Pac-2)
4, Everyone else.
Putting a bunch of teams from level 3 does nothing.
(In response to this post by INSIDE99)
2y
definitely happening. How else could one interpret the sentence "The PAC 12 is going to merge with the Mountain West by next summer."
(In response to this post by INSIDE99)
2y
They could have had this before they left for the ACC. I can't see these replacements doing anything for the "academic elites" of Berkeley or Palo Alto. Boise State, Fresno State, San Diego State, UNLV and Colorado State just will not do for them. I'm sure they will prefer travelling cross country to play Duke, Wake, BC, ND, GT and etc whenever the rest of the ACC schools jump ship.
** Edited by Millpoint at 6/6/2024, 12:10:56 PM
(In response to this post by INSIDE99)
2y
Doesn't matter whether Cal and Stanford (or anyone for that matter) play sports with Duke or with North Idaho College...doesn't impact them academically.
(In response to this post by Millpoint)
2y
confirming the info, or a statement that this is merely your opinion.
** Edited by RVAHokie05 at 6/6/2024, 10:53:30 AM
** Edited by RVAHokie05 at 6/6/2024, 10:54:01 AM
(In response to this post by INSIDE99)
2y
Madagascar?! RVA is airport code for there! 🤔🥴😉🙃🤣
(In response to this post by RVAHokie05)
2y
New Pac-12 Teresa Gould commissioner weighs in on potential Mountain West merger...
On page 11 of the PAC 12 and Mountain West agreement is a section titled "Definitive Transaction" that says the Pac-12 and MW will "negotiate in good faith the consummation, as promptly as reasonably practicable, of a definitive transaction pursuant to which all MWC Member Institutions join Pac-12 as Pac-12 member institutions with no MWC Exit Fee payable by any MWC Member Institution to MWC." The invitations, if made, would be effective as of the 2025-2026 or 2026-2027 season.
https://nevadasportsnet.com/news/reporters/new-pac-12-ter...
Also, Jon Wilner does a good job of covering the PAC 12 from the Bay Area Spokeman-Review.
https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2024/apr/25/pac-12-mail...
Take a look at the Oregon State and Washington State 2024 schedules I posted here about a month ago.
I'm saying it's gonna happen by next summer - or at least an announcement for the 2026 season. I AM SPECULATING. If you are not sure please understand, I AM SPECULATING using info available.
Also, VT is going to beat Vanderbilt in the opener by double digits. Sorry I do not have a link. Not sure why opinions are not so welcome without full proof to some.
(In response to this post by RVAHokie05)
W
WBGV
2y
an athletic alliance and slap on the PAC-12 logo, it will be little more than the Mountain West Conference with a change of clothes. OSU and WSU are surviving on life-support from the settlement money they got when the PAC-12 imploded. The successful coaches at these two schools have left or are trying to leave. The successful players have left or are trying to leave. WSU athletic director left and their President has announced that he is leaving. They have a scheduling agreement now with mostly G5 schools and a media rights contract that pays them a fraction ( not announced but predictable ) of what they were receiving to operate their athletic departments going forward.
The new PAC-12’s revenue stream will be similar to the MWC’s revenue stream and there is little that they can do to change it. Calford & SMU already made their decision out of desperation and joined the ACC for little or no money for many years. I guess you are speculating that if the ACC isn’t around for them to join, then Calford and SMU will have to make another decision out of desperation for the future of their athletic departments. Independence IMO would likely be the best option at that point.
(In response to this post by INSIDE99)
2y
Getting Power Conference status is another. Just saying they will apply hard with pressure. Kind of like Houston and Cleveland demanding to have their NFL franchise returned. Agree, I don't see Power status forthcoming.
(In response to this post by WBGV)
S
Stech
2y
even started out skeptical of your post. However your recent post have swayed me, that you have some good connections and what you are saying is consistent with what I hear/believe will happen in the future.
PS Some here are basketball first fans, and they don’t want the ACC to change. I understand that, I love ACC basketball, but IMHO, you don’t sue your Conference and stay, the question is how big will the buyout be? Also, who has a landing spot if they leave? I think the Mag 7 plus ND have a landing spot in the P2, but will it happen all at once, or over time like expansion has been in the past?
(In response to this post by INSIDE99)
2y
read all he posts.
(In response to this post by Stech)
2y
I’m sure all the teams will be solid and have certain standards for being invited. But make no mistake, that is not a “power” conference. It is just maybe better than the average G5 and will get paid far below the actual P2 and below whatever level we now consider the ACC and B12.
(In response to this post by INSIDE99)
V
VTCALS72
2y
temporarily placed in the ACC and Big 12 by big media while the PAC, who wouldn't play along with their vision gets rebuilt. There has to be a mid level and the heavy population west coast, just like the east coast has to anchor conferences.
(In response to this post by INSIDE99)
2y
and a bunch of G-men isn't going to reverse that. As for "power" conference, can you see the CFP committee inviting a dozen, or so, G5's to share the P4 payroll?
(In response to this post by INSIDE99)
O
obguthr
2y
especially if Calford goes back. If the new Pac takes no more than the top half of Mountain West, it would qualify, IMO. It would be the weakest power conference, but still significantly better than the G5, top to bottom.
(In response to this post by 33laszlo99)
2y
part of a Mountain West PAC as long as the ACC emerges as a stable conference. In addition, with their potential, academics, history, and being the flagship of California - look for them to end up in the Big 10 with Stanford before they go to a G5 conference.
Cal could be a sleeping giant moving forward, they just need an administration that elevates athletics, rather than looking down their noses. The recent collapse of the PAC may just wake them up.
(In response to this post by obguthr)
2y
In the near future I don't see the P2 expanding past 2-4 more schools. The only additions that would be approved for the time being is if that school increases revenue for each member not dilute the revenue chain. Taking less shares is one way.
** Edited by INSIDE99 at 6/7/2024, 1:49:41 AM
(In response to this post by Big12 guy)