Taking VT for example, they pledge money through 2029 - is that a trial run to see the following: How does football improve with the money and new coaching? If it does improve, is it worth the money spent and can VT maintain that level or improve? Do they improve and place a value on the team where they can get in the P2? If it doesn't improve, do teams that have pushed money like VT decide this is sustainable without making the P2? Do they decide we can't keep up and decide how to handle the team then? Or, does college football succeed enough where it keeps the status quo of today and everyone can still profit? I don't think major changes happen until you get to 2029ish and then each university will decide what to do then after they have seen all of this money come in and go out to coaches/players to see if it is worth it to try to stay a major college football program with limited resources by not being in the P2. I think B10/SEC add - I don't have a good feeling of how many each would add. I don't see contracting - the only way the P2 contracts is if they become a P1 with both contracting and adding. I can see both add to get to 20 each. I believe if that is the case, I could see the top remaining brands from the ACC/B12 combine to create a new league (I think creating a new league allows them to contract with not as many lawsuits - I could be way wrong with that assumption). I think if each P2 goes to 24, I could see VT in that mix. In all honesty, to cover most major brands and teams just under that, I would like to see each go 28 - each P2 conference has 4 divisions of 7 teams - 6 divisional opponents, 1 team each from the other 3, and split other games with the other conferences or allow non-P2 games. Then you would just have an NFL play-off model.