All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

M
Joined: 09/15/2012
Posts: 339
Likes: 401
Subscriber

If they pretend to know the number of 2 year olds watching...

then they certainly have the viewership numbers for ACC and other league networks. Is it simply being kept secret as a tactic or data point that ESPN does not want the ACC to have (or possibly Fox)? Key data in terms of measuring the monetary value of different schools when it come to expansion. It especially hurts the Hokies since we are always the #1 or #2 game on the ACC network. FSU and Clemson get the higher profile ESPN game typically. In addition, our out of conference games with the least interest are the ones that ACC network does not cover, likely because it is known these will have the fewest fans turning in. (see Purdue/VT or Marshall, ODU, etc)
Posted: 04/12/2024 at 02:33 PM ET
(In response to this post by HokieAl)

Thread Replies (33)

Full Thread →
ESPN is a business, 2 ways to make more $, cut costs, & more revenue.
Stech 04/11/24 09:41 AM ET
As more and more move toward streaming,
Pylons 04/11/24 07:01 PM ET
Good point, less & less, but many businesses people look backwards instead
Stech 04/11/24 07:50 PM ET
A question on markets and the BIG....why focus on big cities?
mjfhokie 04/12/24 11:07 AM ET
Great questions & good assertions, I would just change the word B1G for Fox
Stech 04/12/24 12:49 PM ET
Thanks for the response.
mjfhokie 04/12/24 02:23 PM ET
Yeah two different models, but both have the potential to work.**
Stech 04/12/24 02:27 PM ET
"What is the Math Path..." If you will indulge a few assumptions
33laszlo99 04/11/24 03:50 PM ET
Where are you getting the school numbers from? I have never seen VT below 5
Stech 04/11/24 04:44 PM ET
VT games are hidden on ACCN and streaming. Not reported in media.
33laszlo99 04/11/24 04:49 PM ET
Here are some notes for the charts:
33laszlo99 04/11/24 04:04 PM ET
I'm digging extensively into the media numbers
HokieAl 04/11/24 04:26 PM ET
If they pretend to know the number of 2 year olds watching...
mjfhokie 04/12/24 02:33 PM ET
I always think it was a deal between 2 UNC alumni
DMV Gobbler 04/11/24 01:27 PM ET
You have a very active.....
2hhoop3 04/11/24 01:35 PM ET
In a scant 40 or so years........
2hhoop3 04/11/24 11:48 AM ET
Your first sentence is so spot on**
Tailgate Guru 04/11/24 12:46 PM ET
I wonder if FOX over paid for the Big 10, not so sure about the SEC, but
Big12 guy 04/11/24 10:58 AM ET
I imagine that Fox and ESPN will set viewership records this year.
hokieZ71 04/12/24 07:56 AM ET
In the short term, I think you are correct.
Big12 guy 04/12/24 08:28 AM ET
Gambling now owns the networks, no such thing as overpaying
Vienna_Hokie 04/11/24 03:34 PM ET
I think we need to readjust our perspective on the money (at least I do)
HokieAl 04/11/24 01:08 PM ET
It may pencil out, but as we
Big12 guy 04/11/24 03:47 PM ET
There are overpaid and underpaid programs as much as there are conferences.
Maroon Baboon 04/11/24 11:17 AM ET
ESPN has spent decades positioning the SEC as a premium product.
hokieball 04/11/24 10:51 AM ET
Let’s say that’s right, does the bump in being in the SEC, but paying more
Stech 04/11/24 11:41 AM ET
ESPN does have a sweetheart deal with the ACC. However, WRT the header of
VTHokie2000 04/11/24 10:49 AM ET
There was a post about this today actually (B12 person FYI)
HokieAl 04/11/24 10:44 AM ET
Tell your friend to put the bottle down, then brew him some java.**
33laszlo99 04/11/24 04:14 PM ET
I don’t see ESPN making more money in this scenario, why pay more for FSU &
Stech 04/11/24 11:46 AM ET
I agree, ESPN will accept whatever situation results from this realignment
33laszlo99 04/11/24 04:22 PM ET
Not a good deal for the ACC IMO.
Maroon Baboon 04/11/24 11:35 AM ET
So ESPN is speaking for the SEC now?
Marooned 04/11/24 11:08 AM ET
Nothing to see here....move along**
Maroon Unit 04/11/24 12:38 PM ET