V
Joined:
01/05/2001
Posts:
7,664
Likes:
1,624
in no particular order: It generates interest, if nothing else continued
discussions on why it shouldn't be by commentators. No such thing as bad PR.
It keeps ND hanging around and I think ND is the best OOC the ACC has, certainly VT's. Will that be forever, eh who knows. I like ND's association with the ACC.
The ACC is static and will be for the next10 years or so, maybe more. Change is good imho and this is what you can do in cfb to change. Not only is the ACC static but provincial. You have complained about the Tobacco Road bunch running the joint and rightly so. This can spread things out. Now with two of them holding things up -UNC & ST-it seems they object to that, at least one could suspect that.
More money from tv. Some folks are po-pooing 4-5 million bucks each but it all adds up. Right now do not foresee 30mm dropping out of the sky at once. We will " have to work two jobs" to make it up for the foreseeable future.
Top shelf academics. Who knows what can become of that, but this football and athletics.
VT probably won't go more than once a year in football and BB so that can be handled. (VT scheduled Az in a few years so going there is no big deal) The other sports, well that will require some creative scheduling I will admit-but, can be done. These are resilient young people not us old foggies.
Would not think it would help recruiting too much in Cali maybe Texas if SmU comes along for the ride.
'Nobody cares about SMU in Texas". Would they if Florida St. comes to town or UNC or even VT? I would like to find out.
Anyway, there are some others but I really don't see any negatives.
Thread Replies (18)
Does Virginia Tech Oppose the ACC Adding Stanford, Cal & SMU
-- WarHog38
Aug 11, 2023 at 04:38 PM ET
WarHog38
•
08/11/23 04:38 PM ET
I hope VT voted No. it’s bad for our student athletes
-- HokieAl
Aug 11, 2023 at 05:45 PM ET
HokieAl
•
08/11/23 05:45 PM ET
Would not be surprised if TAMU winds up in the B1G someday
-- Marooned
Aug 11, 2023 at 07:43 PM ET
Marooned
•
08/11/23 07:43 PM ET
My understanding is it hasn't been voted on yet...
-- arcadtect
Aug 11, 2023 at 04:57 PM ET
arcadtect
•
08/11/23 04:57 PM ET
This is the diplomatic and correct course of action
-- obguthr
Aug 11, 2023 at 06:30 PM ET
obguthr
•
08/11/23 06:30 PM ET
He didn't mention VT in the no vote according to you yesterday, that's why
-- Stech
Aug 11, 2023 at 05:37 PM ET
Stech
•
08/11/23 05:37 PM ET
So someone from VT needs to make ESPN aware of this**
-- Millpoint
Aug 12, 2023 at 04:09 AM ET
Millpoint
•
08/12/23 04:09 AM ET
Probably not something they want out there because our President went 2 Cal
-- Stech
Aug 12, 2023 at 09:56 AM ET
Stech
•
08/12/23 09:56 AM ET
Pat Forde is now reporting 4 members holding it up.
-- HOO86
Aug 11, 2023 at 06:46 PM ET
HOO86
•
08/11/23 06:46 PM ET
I hope VT was against. I just don't see any positives for VT.**
-- Lakeridgehokie
Aug 11, 2023 at 04:42 PM ET
Lakeridgehokie
•
08/11/23 04:42 PM ET
Interesting, I see nothing negative. **
-- VTNSC
Aug 11, 2023 at 05:24 PM ET
VTNSC
•
08/11/23 05:24 PM ET
What positives do you see? I see none.**
-- Atlee Hokie
Aug 12, 2023 at 05:01 PM ET
Atlee Hokie
•
08/12/23 05:01 PM ET
in no particular order: It generates interest, if nothing else continued
◄
-- VTNSC
Aug 14, 2023 at 04:34 PM ET
VTNSC
•
08/14/23 04:34 PM ET