All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

VTHokie2000
Joined: 01/01/2005
Posts: 41,416
Likes: 17,028

You say there are no "good reasons" to have symmetry. Well if you look at

the pros, you should discover that most of their "conferences" are balanced. The reason they do it is because it makes it a lot easier to create a scheduling model they can keep using year after year. If one of the conferences (or divisions within a conference) becomes imbalanced, then that is when you start to see scheduling quirks pop up. If the P2s opt to create formal divisions within their conference or informal via "protected conference games," then they could want some sort of "balance" to make sure the numbers work (i.e. each team has the same number of protected opponents, etc.).
Posted: 04/27/2026 at 11:31 AM ET
(In response to this post by RandomAsianGuy)

Thread Replies (8)

Full Thread →
Why the P2 will not have the same # of teams and what it means for the ACC
RandomAsianGuy 04/25/26 03:23 PM ET
You say there are no "good reasons" to have symmetry. Well if you look at
VTHokie2000 04/27/26 11:31 AM ET
Yes the pros are well balanced. But the colleges are decentralized. Why?
RandomAsianGuy 04/27/26 01:21 PM ET
Exemption to antitrust laws may or may not be a factor. The reason the
VTHokie2000 04/27/26 02:18 PM ET
The college model has not been balanced but you're entitled to your opinion**
RandomAsianGuy 04/27/26 05:36 PM ET
If you truly believe antitrust exemption is driving the pro leagues'
VTHokie2000 04/27/26 07:47 PM ET
Gee. As I said, you are entitled to your opinion.
RandomAsianGuy 04/27/26 08:28 PM ET
Hokie, the reason you came up with is a "good" reason, but not a critical
33laszlo99 04/27/26 12:23 PM ET
Even if the Big Ten were to expand to 23 teams tomorrow, don't be surprised
VTHokie2000 04/27/26 02:10 PM ET