All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

hokieZ71
Joined: 01/03/2007
Posts: 18,413
Likes: 9,738

If each of the P4 went to 18 teams, it could work well in the long run.

The caveat is the money would need to be distributed more evenly for competition sake, so….not likely. But, it could be sooooo good. Split the P4 into 9 team divisions. And play the same 8 conference games every year. (Welcome back rivalries!). Fill out the 3 nonconference games by matching up finishing positions in each league vs each of the other three P4 leagues (I.e. 1st place ACC plays nonconference games vs 1st place SEC/B10/Big12 and then work your way down). This creates loads of compelling games for the next year and increases scheduling parity. Cap the season at 12 games so exactly 1 buy game is played vs G5 teams annually and all schools will rotate between 6 and 7 home games every year. Ban FCS games from counting towards records. With the scheduling parity above, this paves the way for the Top 2 in each division to qualify for a 16 team tournament. Tell ND they either join a league or are left out. Once the 72 spots are taken, that’s it…. Cut out the G5. The job is done. The handwringing over a 9-3 SEC team getting beat out by a 9-3 ACC team would be sweaty, but that happens in the NFL when you have a 9-8 division champion of a weak division getting in over a couple 10-7 teams that don’t get a wild card. But that lasts a week until the playoffs start and nobody ever remembers it. Pay all media rights money to each of the 72 teams equally, set a salary cap for players annually and restricted portal times to after the playoffs and before Spring practice/OTA’s. No more bowl games. Start the next season with a nonconference game. Maybe find a way to set up neutral sites for these for biggest opening week nonconference matchups and use that as a “preseason bowl week”
Posted: 02/22/2025 at 09:12 AM ET
(In response to this post by Stech)

Thread Replies (24)

Full Thread →
Josh Pate, likely no change in 2025 PO seeding, 4-4-2-2-1-1 likely for 26.
Stech 02/21/25 07:29 PM ET
My take
RandomAsianGuy 02/22/25 05:05 PM ET
The ACC has no such option. **
Big12 guy 02/22/25 06:47 PM ET
What option?**
RandomAsianGuy 02/22/25 08:08 PM ET
To make any decision against the P2 without checking with
Big12 guy 02/22/25 08:22 PM ET
agree**
VTCALS72 02/24/25 08:21 AM ET
Going against the P2 is a technically possible but unrealistic option
RandomAsianGuy 02/22/25 09:51 PM ET
I agree with your last statement, but to be clear,
Big12 guy 02/23/25 06:20 AM ET
That’s right, P2 will grab what they want, and eventually break off 🏈🏀4💵
Stech 02/23/25 11:34 AM ET
We don't have the option of a timetable either
VTCALS72 02/24/25 08:29 AM ET
I'm with you on that. keep in mind, that I am an
Big12 guy 02/23/25 04:15 PM ET
Just a comment on the media part of that.
VTCALS72 02/24/25 08:37 AM ET
All that is well and good........
2hhoop3 02/23/25 04:20 PM ET
I don't think the paying player genie will ever be
Big12 guy 02/23/25 04:32 PM ET
Do not disagree with that either......
2hhoop3 02/23/25 04:38 PM ET
Think of all of the kids playing at the FCS level that play
Big12 guy 02/23/25 04:49 PM ET
AGREE. Maybe GW will field a team. **
VPI 1924 02/23/25 12:36 PM ET
Their biggest impediment at this point is ESPN
PadrosWindup 02/22/25 04:32 PM ET
If each of the P4 went to 18 teams, it could work well in the long run.
hokieZ71 02/22/25 09:12 AM ET
do you honestly think a P4 really exist anymore? **
VTCALS72 02/24/25 08:41 AM ET
A couple questions regarding your proposal.
VTHokie2000 02/22/25 09:27 AM ET
#1. Exactly, for football. But it matters for other sports.
hokieZ71 02/22/25 10:28 AM ET
I doubt you could come up with a strong enough sales pitch to convince VT
VTHokie2000 02/22/25 11:16 AM ET
What the heck? Why would that happen?**
hokieZ71 02/22/25 12:42 PM ET
As I stated previously it would happen because the ACC wanted to make sure
VTHokie2000 02/22/25 04:17 PM ET