proven by literally the post you responded to: "I think both sides have some valid points and I do not have a problem with sports organizations setting rules or guidelines regarding the participation of transgender athletes. " Somehow you then twist that into: "The argument by you and your ilk is anyone who fells like a woman can play against women. " When you can't even begin a post without a complete fabrication it's hard to take anything you say seriously. Your whole copy paste job is unnecessary b/c you have no idea what the boxer in question has or does not have. Also given your aversion to both truth and facts I'd request that you link anything you're citing b/c you've proven that you are simply not trustworthy. Pictures of headlines and copy/pastes without sources are simply not good enough at this point given your lack of credibility and integrity. An example of why you are not trustworthy is this comment: "What is silly is thinking that someone who is 7’ tall would be in the same boxing class as someone who is 5’7”. It’s very silly indeed. " That is silly. It's also not remotely what I said. Here's the quote: " Are you trying to argue that someone who grows to be 7 feet tall does not have a competitive advantage in basketball compared to someone who is 5'7?" Do you see the word boxing in there anywhere? Nope. Do you see the word basketball? Yep. And yet you completely misrepresented what was said. I have no idea if you just didn't read the post or if you intentionally made a nonsensical reply to it but either way you are trying to argue something that was never said or implied. Again the point (that you've now avoided multiple times) was to illustrate that all kinds of biological and genetic advantages exist in sports (men's or women's). "I don’t have puppeteers, junior. I see a man beating on a woman and want the situation reversed. I think people like you get off on it. " Like I said in another post, it's an easy trigger for people like you. Just look at your emotional, angry response. And once again you make another completely unfounded assumption about "people like me". I can't and don't speak for anyone else but as I said in the post you just responded to I don't really have strong feelings either way when it comes to transgender athletes. To try to imply some sort of sexual gratification is involved is both creepy and perhaps a bit of projection on your part. You certainly seem to spend more time concerned with people's biological makeup than I do. "This person wasn’t tested and barred from boxing until last year." Again I'm going to need a source saying the boxer had never been tested previously. I don't trust you or your word especially given that athletes in most sports are tested for a variety of things at regular intervals. But for the sake of argument let's pretend it's true. That means this same boxer with the same alleged advantages boxed plenty of other bouts with little to no controversy including in the Olympics three years ago (where she lost and didn't medal). Did the advantage simply not exist then? If it is such an unfair advantage how has this boxer EVER lost a fight? Or is it possible that you had no idea about any of this until whatever media outlet you worship told how to think about it and then suddenly it was a super big deal? No puppet... riiiiiiight. As for the last bit of nonsense about "murdering little girls" (parroting more talking points I see but not a puppet), I'm glad you admit that you value a potential person/woman more than an actual viable one... but that still makes you way less concerned about women and their health than me. But I guess "War on Potential Women" doesn't have the same ring to it right? And just to be crystal clear, I don't "like" abortion. But I most definitely think that women should have the right to decide what is best for them and their circumstances and I do not think that any woman should be forced to have a baby when she doesn't want to. I feel sad for both you and the women in your life that you don't feel the same.