All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

David Cunningham David Cunningham OP
May 29, 2026 at 10:59 AM ET
Virginia Tech And Maryland Shorten Football Series (Story)
Link: Story

21 Replies

H
Hate2SeeItEnd Hokie
2mo
Good. I hope we keep BYU
BYU, I think will be pretty cool, plus I'm interested in traveling to Provo and seeing the LDS history and that stuff. I've never been to Utah. Arizona, I dont care either way, but glad we shortened Maryland.
1
1947Sunbowl
2mo
I remember Tim Sands inssisting on this series for Networking
He wanted to be in DMV more regularly for networking. Whit really didnt want a long series. Makes sense.... and be interesting if they keep Arizona and BYU as well. alot of stuff....
V
Vippie1
2mo
I'm hearing VT paid $600k to cancel.
HokieAl HokieAl
2mo
MD already has a replacement, so they’ve had this know awhile
Where are you hearing that VT paid to reduce the series? That would be a very odd decision against a P2 regional opponent unless we have a whale to replace them with some media money in made for tv matchups. It might be true that we paid. It’s just odd to me. Very curious to see what additional information is shared by VT or reporters on this. ** Edited by HokieAl at 5/29/2026, 11:23:29 AM
reestuart reestuart
2mo
VT already has ND to give 10 P4 opponents. It makes sense that VT would
want to bail on those two seasons.
E
EDGEMAN
2mo
Why not just postpone those two games a few years?
reestuart reestuart
2mo
I guess VT didn’t want to since they bought the games out.
H
Hate2SeeItEnd Hokie
2mo
Jeff Erman from 247/MD Sports reported
Ermann reported/wrote about this and he doesn't give a specific name of who told him, but does report the source is an athletic official from U.of Maryland. ACC rule requires 9 conference games and its not on Maryland. We didn't have any other choice. We absolutely did pay. ** Edited by Hate2SeeItEnd Hokie at 5/29/2026, 1:23:08 PM
V
Vippie1
2mo
the only possible mitigate here is maybe the ACC agreed to reimburse VT
as VT is eating the $600k to adhere to a new policy passed by the ACC
VTHokie2000 VTHokie2000
2mo
I would be very surprised if the ACC agreed to do that since the ACC would
be on the hook to do that for all members who cancel a future game/series. Most likely the schools chalk it up to the cost of doing business in the conference. Particularly if all schools or majority of the schools approved the scheduling change.
S
soldcokesatLane
2mo
This is how I would think it works as well.
E
EDGEMAN
2mo
The ACC owes us money for this, and the loss of a home game this year.
Losing a home game, and requiring us to travel to SMU is a huge hit to our funding this year.
R
RoanokeHokie1872
2mo
Who is Maryland replacing us with?
K
KCHokie2
2mo
Dang. It's a slap in the face how quickly we were replaced.
** Edited by KCHokie2 at 5/29/2026, 8:15:07 PM
reestuart reestuart
2mo
I would guess they were holding off on announcing the cancelation until
there was a replacement signed up.
R
RoanokeHokie1872
2mo
I agree. Also a fan of any Kevin Malone gif. Another Dunder Mifflin Hokie
1
1947Sunbowl
2mo
Well its rhe big 10
Business first folks jump for a power 2 game
T
Terrapin
2mo
It's Not a Slap in the Face From This End
To be able to schedule games with a program like Baylor means to me that there was a lot of advance warning. There is a lot of respect for Virginia Polytechnical Institute all through the Maryland athletic programs (including baseball -- we miss Coach Szefc). Most Maryland fans would rather mix it up with Tech, even though it might hurt in DMV recruiting...
F
FCGOBBLER
2mo
Baylor
V
Vippie1
2mo
Someone i know in sports media with ties to UMD
I assume this is so we can add a 9th acc game. Probably been in works for a while just waiting to announce. We are the ones breaching the contract so no way around paying up.
H
Hate2SeeItEnd Hokie
2mo
Correct. 9 games required and our breach. No other way around it