All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

David Cunningham David Cunningham OP
Jul 09, 2026 at 11:33 AM ET
Hokies WBB To Play In 2026 Emerald Coast Classic (Story)
Some MBB scheduling notes in the bottom of this story as well.
Link: Story

16 Replies

P
Pride_and_Joy
The women’s team sure seems to be recruiting well.
Did they get a bump in NIL funding?
G
GCHokie34
Theyre recruiting against schools in their conference...
Who dont fund their programs Women's basketball (much like all non-rev sports) is a matter of which schools choose to fund the sport VT does well in wrestling because not nearly as many fully fund the sport Coastal Carolina chooses baseball Akron chooses soccer But in sports where everyone funds the bare minimum at least (i.e. football and mens basketball) being at the bottom levels of that funding makes talent acquisition difficult Hope this helps
U2Hokie U2Hokie
Are we doing OK vs the ACC teams that are funding their program?
I was looking for your latest spins on both mens and womens BB teams - like your perspective! My sense is that the women did better than the men this cycle and that any impact from BOV $$$, CJF push, new AD hire will impact both teams in 2028 vs 2027...? But the womens team seems to be ahead of mens on paper...
G
GCHokie34
Both are impacted at different levels...
Lets put some arbitrary amounts out there to illustrate the point... Lets say mens basketball is in a conference whose funding is like this Team 1: 10 mil Team 2: 9.5 mil Team 3: 9 mil Team 4: 8.5 mil Team 5: 8 mil Team 6: 7.5 mil Virginia Tech: 7 mil Team 7: 6.5 mil Team 8: 6 mil Team 9: 5.5 mil While middle of the pack, the gap between VT and the best team would be manageable On the women's side, lets say it looks like this Team 1: 3 million Team 2: 2.7 million Team 3: 2.4 million Virginia Tech: 2.1 million Team 4: 1.8 million Team 5: 500k Team 6: 250k Team 7: 125k Team 8: 100k Team 9: 100k Now lets say it is decided both mens and women's programs are going to be cut by 20% for next season The budgets would like like this on the mens side Team 1: 10 million Team 2: 9.5 million Team 3: 9 million Team 4: 8.5 million Team 5: 8 million Team 6: 7.5 million Team 7: 6.5 million Team 8: 6 million Virginia Tech: 5.6 million Team 9: 5.5 million And on the women's side Team 1: 3 million Team 2: 2.7 million Team 3: 2.4 million Team 4: 1.8 million Virginia Tech: 1.68 million Team 5: 500k Team 6: 250k Team 7: 125k Team 8: 100k Team 9: 100k Both teams are affected, but because the bottom half of the women's league doesnt fund their programs, you still have access to the top half of the talent within the league But for men's, they would move further down the list and go from competing for the middle third of the talent to the bottom third of the talent. You can then decide to pool that money and try to gain access to a short few higher tier players and have depth issues or you can spread the money around and have top end talent issues. But for the women, they don't need to make the same concessions. Their losses are marginal in comparison to their peers so if they make some good evaluations it could be as though they didnt lose much funding at all (or it could be detrimental if they do make mistakes in evaluating talent...like everyone else)
P
Pride_and_Joy
Seems like a modest investment in funding for WBB
could pay a big return in on-court success. Glad it seems we’re doing so.
G
GCHokie34
They reduced their funding
Hope this helps
P
Pride_and_Joy
Reduced funding and so many top 100
recruits! Great job by Duffy and staff!!
G
GCHokie34
Oh, I just assumed you could read...
Gobbler Guru Gobbler Guru
Two things can be true at the same time.
Women's hoops at VT has more funds relative to some of their conference peers than the men's team does. Women's hoops at VT has a better recruiter as HC than the men's team does. It's not either/or. Money has always been part of recruiting, whether that shows up in facilities or direct payments to players. But the vision, track record, charisma and salesmanship of the recruiter matters too.
P
Pride_and_Joy
Not sure why others keep bringing MBB
into the discussion. I was merely pointing out that the WBB seems to be doing really well with recruiting. But I’ll stop — as this apparently doesn’t belong on the MBB board.
Chris Coleman Chris Coleman
I'm not sure what the NIL/Rev share looks like, but...
Here are the traditional expenditures of the women's program for the last three years, per our financial reports... FY23: $5.29 million FY24: $7.21 million FY25: $6.5 million So after making the Final Four (FY23), we appear to have given Kenny a lot more resources (FY24). Then he left anyway, and our support dropped a bit (FY25). FY25 was Duffy's first year, so it's hard to say if we dropped support a bit, or if she just didn't spend as much, or some of both. We'll know the FY26 numbers at this time next year, so the sample size will be bigger. But this a better conversation for the women's hoops board.
VaTechHokiesACC VaTechHokiesACC
This man does his homework
U2Hokie U2Hokie
TY that was great!
S
saret
Good explanation.
L
Lancelot Link
The correlation is pretty obvious
P
Pride_and_Joy
Awesome to see the WBB team having such recruiting success.
It should be a fun season ahead.