Hokies WBB To Play In 2026 Emerald Coast Classic (Story)
Some MBB scheduling notes in the bottom of this story as well.
Link:
Story
16 Replies
3w
Did they get a bump in NIL funding?
(In response to this post by David Cunningham)
3w
Who dont fund their programs
Women's basketball (much like all non-rev sports) is a matter of which schools choose to fund the sport
VT does well in wrestling because not nearly as many fully fund the sport
Coastal Carolina chooses baseball
Akron chooses soccer
But in sports where everyone funds the bare minimum at least (i.e. football and mens basketball) being at the bottom levels of that funding makes talent acquisition difficult
Hope this helps
(In response to this post by Pride_and_Joy)
3w
I was looking for your latest spins on both mens and womens BB teams - like your perspective!
My sense is that the women did better than the men this cycle and that any impact from BOV $$$, CJF push, new AD hire will impact both teams in 2028 vs 2027...? But the womens team seems to be ahead of mens on paper...
(In response to this post by GCHokie34)
3w
Lets put some arbitrary amounts out there to illustrate the point...
Lets say mens basketball is in a conference whose funding is like this
Team 1: 10 mil
Team 2: 9.5 mil
Team 3: 9 mil
Team 4: 8.5 mil
Team 5: 8 mil
Team 6: 7.5 mil
Virginia Tech: 7 mil
Team 7: 6.5 mil
Team 8: 6 mil
Team 9: 5.5 mil
While middle of the pack, the gap between VT and the best team would be manageable
On the women's side, lets say it looks like this
Team 1: 3 million
Team 2: 2.7 million
Team 3: 2.4 million
Virginia Tech: 2.1 million
Team 4: 1.8 million
Team 5: 500k
Team 6: 250k
Team 7: 125k
Team 8: 100k
Team 9: 100k
Now lets say it is decided both mens and women's programs are going to be cut by 20% for next season
The budgets would like like this on the mens side
Team 1: 10 million
Team 2: 9.5 million
Team 3: 9 million
Team 4: 8.5 million
Team 5: 8 million
Team 6: 7.5 million
Team 7: 6.5 million
Team 8: 6 million
Virginia Tech: 5.6 million
Team 9: 5.5 million
And on the women's side
Team 1: 3 million
Team 2: 2.7 million
Team 3: 2.4 million
Team 4: 1.8 million
Virginia Tech: 1.68 million
Team 5: 500k
Team 6: 250k
Team 7: 125k
Team 8: 100k
Team 9: 100k
Both teams are affected, but because the bottom half of the women's league doesnt fund their programs, you still have access to the top half of the talent within the league
But for men's, they would move further down the list and go from competing for the middle third of the talent to the bottom third of the talent. You can then decide to pool that money and try to gain access to a short few higher tier players and have depth issues or you can spread the money around and have top end talent issues.
But for the women, they don't need to make the same concessions. Their losses are marginal in comparison to their peers so if they make some good evaluations it could be as though they didnt lose much funding at all (or it could be detrimental if they do make mistakes in evaluating talent...like everyone else)
(In response to this post by U2Hokie)
2w
could pay a big return in on-court success. Glad it seems we’re doing so.
(In response to this post by GCHokie34)
2w
recruits! Great job by Duffy and staff!!
(In response to this post by GCHokie34)
2w
Women's hoops at VT has more funds relative to some of their conference peers than the men's team does.
Women's hoops at VT has a better recruiter as HC than the men's team does.
It's not either/or.
Money has always been part of recruiting, whether that shows up in facilities or direct payments to players. But the vision, track record, charisma and salesmanship of the recruiter matters too.
(In response to this post by Pride_and_Joy)
2w
into the discussion. I was merely pointing out that the WBB seems to be doing really well with recruiting. But I’ll stop — as this apparently doesn’t belong on the MBB board.
(In response to this post by Gobbler Guru)
I'm not sure what the NIL/Rev share looks like, but...
Here are the traditional expenditures of the women's program for the last three years, per our financial reports...
FY23: $5.29 million
FY24: $7.21 million
FY25: $6.5 million
So after making the Final Four (FY23), we appear to have given Kenny a lot more resources (FY24). Then he left anyway, and our support dropped a bit (FY25). FY25 was Duffy's first year, so it's hard to say if we dropped support a bit, or if she just didn't spend as much, or some of both. We'll know the FY26 numbers at this time next year, so the sample size will be bigger.
But this a better conversation for the women's hoops board.
(In response to this post by Pride_and_Joy)
This man does his homework
(In response to this post by GCHokie34)
3w
It should be a fun season ahead.
(In response to this post by GCHokie34)