V
Joined:
09/28/2020
Posts:
847
Likes:
3,245
The President knows
This will be challenged and overturned. I think it is to get the ball rolling on common sense dialogue. 7, 8 year guys pushing high 20s is not in the spirit of collegiate competition in my opinion whether it benefits my school or not. An age or year of play seems more enforceable over the transfer rule. I liked the thought of 1 transfer then another would cost a year. I’m sure it’s not fair to some but every year free agency is not healthy either imo. I think many of us don’t like the rent a player mindset but know it’s part of the game now. It would be nice to solve some of these issues and he was getting the discussion going.
Thread Replies (7)
The reverse Midas touch
-- Heathrow Hokie
Apr 06, 2026 at 04:44 PM ET
Heathrow Hokie
•
04/06/26 04:44 PM ET
Five years of eligibility will reduce some roster spots for HS recruits**
-- UpperQuad
Apr 03, 2026 at 10:44 PM ET
UpperQuad
•
04/03/26 10:44 PM ET
Doesn't sound enforceable IMO **
-- donjfs3
Apr 03, 2026 at 06:56 PM ET
donjfs3
•
04/03/26 06:56 PM ET
The intent was to bring the conversation to the forefront... hopefully
-- Palmetto Hokie
Apr 04, 2026 at 03:45 PM ET
Palmetto Hokie
•
04/04/26 03:45 PM ET