All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

VTChip VTChip OP
Jun 06, 2026 at 06:29 PM ET
NCAA tweaks proposed 5-for-5 rule; vote schedule for June 23-24
The NCAA Cabinet met Friday and tweaked the proposed 5-for-5 Rule. The key point of this age-based eligibility model would allow student-athletes up to five years of competition during a five-year window. The idea is to simplify eligibility and eliminate all the current exceptions, such as redshirt seasons, medical waivers, and subjective hardship appeals. Yesterday’s tweak, per ESPN, “now says the clock will start upon initial full-time enrollment in college or at the beginning of the academic year following their 19th birthday, whichever occurs first.” The rule has a lot of support, including NCAA President Charlie Baker and outgoing VT President Tim Sands, who is currently the Chairman of the Division I Board of Directors. Sands was quoted as saying “This is about clear and consistent standards. The time is now to reform the period of eligibility rules.” This rule will reportedly take effect at the beginning of the 2026–27 academic year, which means current student-athletes would be covered and could potentially play a fifth season. So VT softball’s upcoming year’s roster, including seniors-to-be Michelle Chatfield, Emma Mazzarone, Zoe Yaeger, Addy Foster, Annika Rohs and others, could play an extra year, IF they so desired (AND IF there were a roster spot available). The downside, as Extra Inning Softball recently pointed out, is the roster congestion that this rule could cause. For example, VT Softball currently has five commits in the Class of 2027. If the roster limit stays at 25 (which it sounds like it will), there could be a real log jam if some of the players want to play a fifth year. Stay tuned.

16 Replies

U
UpperQuad
1mo
If it passes, they should increase the roster limits
Otherwise, there will be few opportunities for kids to continue their athletic careers at the college level.
laphroaig laphroaig
1mo
Depends on what develops. Junior Colleges, Community Colleges could start
softball programs. Isn't it that way in other sports? "Super" Travel Softball?
U
UpperQuad
1mo
This will penalize athletes and other schools who do missions.
It also makes it tough for students who enroll after military service and want to play a sport. On a positive note, it should reduce the number of foreign pros brought over to the USA for college teams in track, basketball, and soccer.
Atlee Hokie Atlee Hokie
1mo
IMO, there will be not negative repercussions for ...
... folks on a mission or someone who goes in the service and then want to play sports. NCAA would lose a court case so fast if they ruled either of those athletes out of eligibility.
VTChip VTChip OP
1mo
Those are actually allowable exceptions
“Exceptions are being considered for religious missions, military service, and pregnancy.”
F
FriendofCoal
1mo
How many scholarships did softball end up with?
VTChip VTChip OP
1mo
25 is the NCAA limit
F
FriendofCoal
1mo
I should of said how many are we funding?
VTChip VTChip OP
1mo
I do not know that
My guess would be 16 or 17 but that information is not available
MidloHokie MidloHokie
1mo
Based on what was said by the volleyball and men's tennis coach at the . .
. . . Alumni Weekend breakfast I'd say your estimate is likely accurate. It's clear that our coaches need to be graded on a curve based on resources provided. We're just not going to be competitive in some sports with the current funding/spending model. ** Edited by MidloHokie at 6/7/2026, 8:26:56 PM
F
FriendofCoal
1mo
I think 5 years with the gap in scholarships will lead to a
consolidation of talent.
N
nkhooch
1mo
Didn't COVID create a similar log jam for high school recruits?
VTChip VTChip OP
1mo
Somewhat, but the NCAA allowed roster exemptions
That is, student-athletes who exercised their Covid year did not count against a school’s roster limit. I’m hoping something similar will happen this time, but it hasn’t been mentioned in any of the articles I’ve read
laphroaig laphroaig
1mo
If this passes it messes with that last several years of recruiting.
If you have a player the caliber of Michelle Chatfield who you can get a 5th year of playing, certainly you give her a roster spot over a recruit. It's equal to giving a roster spot to someone like Addy Foster thru the portal over a recruit. Wonder if junior colleges have softball programs or if there are places for softball like Fork Union is for football, not military, but someplace where a recruit can go for a season or two with the understanding that they can get spot at VT in a year or two instead of right out of hi school. Maybe a higher level of travel ball to delay college. Automatic 5th year without "permission" may have a serious ripple effect.
H
Hockeydad
1mo
Getting a 5th year for that bunch would be awesome!
Probably be a juggling act by Pete to make it work. 🤞
laphroaig laphroaig
1mo
One recruited senior last season vs six next season. Have to do some
research but six looks like an abnormally high number. Virtually an entire recruiting class staying on the team all four years and now being given the opportunity for a fifth year? If six stay on next season for one end of the roster, something definitely has to give on the other end, probably the middle and factors into how you work the portal. Roster Management is more than juggling. It's become Rocket Science.