All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

VTChip VTChip OP
Apr 08, 2026 at 10:27 AM ET
Here's VT's stats rankings nationally
Batting Average, 5th (.374) Slugging Pct., 5th (.670) Home Runs per Game, 8th (1.87) Hits allowed per 7 innings, 7th (5.23) Strikeouts per 7 innings, 8th (8.19)

29 Replies

Italian Stallion Italian Stallion
3mo
Chip, do they keep stats on just walks per 7 inning or how about
pass balls/wild pitches. I believe we may be on the wrong side of those stats
hokiepro hokiepro
3mo
WHIP shows how we’ve given up too many walks
Although we’re top 10 in fewest hits allowed we’re not in the top 30 for WHIP
VTChip VTChip OP
3mo
Unfortunately, that's not a stat the NCAA tracks.
I linked their softball stats page below
VTHokie2000 VTHokie2000
3mo
The neat thing about statistics is it can paint a fascinating picture.
Now that VT has established itself as a "regular" in the polls and postseason, which of the former VT teams do you think this team matches up very well against (assuming they were to play in a best-of-7 series)?
J
J2KHokie
3mo
Might
be a great question for QCP to get him involved on the softball side. (Also, to rescue him from the dregs of baseball stats this year!)
VTHokie2000 VTHokie2000
3mo
I know if a team has a really really really really really dominant pitcher
in softball, then that is often enough to leave there with a W. However, if a team is a more dominant hitting team than a team with a very dominant pitcher, could that team get enough hits or runners on base to steal a game or even the series (even if the series turned into a pitcher's duel)? Basically, I am curious about the parts of the picture the stats can't paint. The parts in between the lines (or baselines) that is open to interpretation. For example, most people's immediate reaction might be any roster with Tincher on it would win the series every time. However, if you peel back the layers and look more closely, then the series might be closer to 50-50 because the current team does a lot more overall things "better" than any of those teams. It doesn't change what those teams accomplished. This exercise can give fans a different lens to view the current team because it gives them another reference point for comparison purposes.
S
Sonyesman
3mo
Many ways to win in a big tournament. Yes, excellent pitching is best
1 super star, the issue, only a few true super stars in the game. 2 aces is also really good! Our beloved Hokies in 2026. 3 really strong pitchers - Maybe UVA, anyone else? After that, no way I see a multiple wins in NCAA like formats.
VTHokie2000 VTHokie2000
3mo
I wasn't thinking just a tournament, but also an "important" series too.
Softball is one of those sports where the same pitcher could start multiple games in a row and be just as effective in each game. Hokie fans probably remember Tincher or Rochard taking the circle for multiple games in a row and the rest of the team doing just enough to win the game and/or series. If the program (as a whole) has greatly improved from those days, then is "just enough" still good enough to beat the current squad? Or would Tincher's and/or Rochard's teammates have to step up their game too because they would likely need to score more than 1 or 2 runs to win a game. Given enough time has probably passed since Tincher took the circle, it might even be fun to do a panel debate on this topic. Create a phantom tournament, call it the VT Arthur's World Series for fun, where various past (and present) VT teams are placed in the same structure as the Softball College World Series. Then debate (as a panel) how the games could play out to see who the group thinks would take the crown. It could be a fun exercise to allow fans to appreciate the present while still remembering the past especially if people never got to see some of these former players in action.
TomTurkey TomTurkey
3mo
Double play is a two-edge sword
Opposing teams aren't generally on base to where VT can turn one
V
VT One
3mo
Great numbers. Not a stat on this list but didn’t I read that we are very
high nationally in doubles? Now that’s a big run producer.
VTHokieTom VTHokieTom
3mo
Yep……………#2 in doubles per game
In total doubles for the season, I believe we are #1 but that stat was N/A today. 🤬
VTChip VTChip OP
3mo
We are tied with Florida for the number of doubles at 82...
But they have played three more games than VT
TomTurkey TomTurkey
3mo
Some of those doubles were inches from being BOOMS
Maybe we can post "Boom" for them
H
Hokie-2x
3mo
Boometes
laphroaig laphroaig
3mo
We need to stop trying to hit them thru the fence. Maybe when we have a
big lead it would be ok. :-)
W
william floyd
3mo
Agree, our players should try to hit the ball OVER the fence.
TomTurkey TomTurkey
3mo
Testing the fences for weak spots
I like testing the scoreboard and trees, and playgrounds and adjacent streets. A direct hit on a vehicle will be donated as a 3fer HR, with a grand slam counting thusly as a triple double. Happy hunting, ladies!
VTChip VTChip OP
3mo
"Almost a Boom?"
TomTurkey TomTurkey
3mo
Almost a...
TomTurkey TomTurkey
3mo
But what about bints? 🤷🏽‍♂️😊
VTHokieTom VTHokieTom
3mo
H🥎KIES are #289 out of 303…………🙂
We don’t need no stinking sac bunts 😎
TomTurkey TomTurkey
3mo
Bints are a selective tactic
SAC bints can be the difference between a Win and a Loss
VTChip VTChip OP
3mo
You are the official keeper of the bints!
TomTurkey TomTurkey
3mo
Not nationally. 😬 Pete has used the art well.
W
william floyd
3mo
bints supporters are a select group, maybe of one. Exclusive club.
TomTurkey TomTurkey
3mo
😬 One of the few ways I ever got on base
Italian Stallion Italian Stallion
3mo
Speed
TomTurkey TomTurkey
3mo
Get on and 2 SBs, but..get..on..
W
william floyd
3mo
Great. This team deserves all of the support we can give it.