in softball, then that is often enough to leave there with a W. However, if a team is a more dominant hitting team than a team with a very dominant pitcher, could that team get enough hits or runners on base to steal a game or even the series (even if the series turned into a pitcher's duel)? Basically, I am curious about the parts of the picture the stats can't paint. The parts in between the lines (or baselines) that is open to interpretation. For example, most people's immediate reaction might be any roster with Tincher on it would win the series every time. However, if you peel back the layers and look more closely, then the series might be closer to 50-50 because the current team does a lot more overall things "better" than any of those teams. It doesn't change what those teams accomplished. This exercise can give fans a different lens to view the current team because it gives them another reference point for comparison purposes.