Softball is one of those sports where the same pitcher could start multiple games in a row and be just as effective in each game. Hokie fans probably remember Tincher or Rochard taking the circle for multiple games in a row and the rest of the team doing just enough to win the game and/or series. If the program (as a whole) has greatly improved from those days, then is "just enough" still good enough to beat the current squad? Or would Tincher's and/or Rochard's teammates have to step up their game too because they would likely need to score more than 1 or 2 runs to win a game. Given enough time has probably passed since Tincher took the circle, it might even be fun to do a panel debate on this topic. Create a phantom tournament, call it the VT Arthur's World Series for fun, where various past (and present) VT teams are placed in the same structure as the Softball College World Series. Then debate (as a panel) how the games could play out to see who the group thinks would take the crown. It could be a fun exercise to allow fans to appreciate the present while still remembering the past especially if people never got to see some of these former players in action.