More like "credit" for a win instead of a real win? Maybe the official
score becomes 1-0. In a league with real tiebreakers to determine the champion, runs scored would be one of the tiebreakers so credit for the win with no runs scored almost seems appropriate since you really didn't truly win.
Thread Replies (10)
Appy has a strange tie breaker. The home team chooses to take offense or
-- Hokie-2x
Jul 04, 2026 at 09:58 AM ET
Hokie-2x
•
07/04/26 09:58 AM ET
Sooooo... what you are saying, is.... Pulaski lost, 9-9?
-- HokieNL
Jul 04, 2026 at 04:42 PM ET
HokieNL
•
07/04/26 04:42 PM ET
It was an ugly way to lose. At one point they led I think 7-3. Had bases
-- Hokie-2x
Jul 04, 2026 at 05:51 PM ET
Hokie-2x
•
07/04/26 05:51 PM ET
"Bluefield beats Pulaski, 9-9"**
-- HokieNL
Jul 04, 2026 at 06:02 PM ET
HokieNL
•
07/04/26 06:02 PM ET
That is an interesting tiebreaker
-- VTChip
Jul 04, 2026 at 10:10 AM ET
VTChip
•
07/04/26 10:10 AM ET
So you could win a 0-0 tie without scoring a run?**
-- VTCC 65
Jul 04, 2026 at 01:13 PM ET
VTCC 65
•
07/04/26 01:13 PM ET
More like "credit" for a win instead of a real win? Maybe the official
◄
-- laphroaig
Jul 04, 2026 at 02:07 PM ET
laphroaig
•
07/04/26 02:07 PM ET
Tell me you won without really winning
-- TomTurkey
Jul 04, 2026 at 03:11 PM ET
TomTurkey
•
07/04/26 03:11 PM ET
Yeah the offense hardly scored but did their job giving the defense time
-- laphroaig
Jul 04, 2026 at 09:33 PM ET
laphroaig
•
07/04/26 09:33 PM ET
Now, Tom. You know we won it all in 1999. Since games went only 3Qs then. **
-- HokieNL
Jul 04, 2026 at 04:44 PM ET
HokieNL
•
07/04/26 04:44 PM ET