All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

N
Joined: 01/01/2005
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 1,995
Subscriber

I tend to agree that if the defense is sitting there with the ball,

obstruction should not be an issue. But, how would you make a rule based upon how far away from the plate the runner is when the ball is caught? That would also introduce some subjectivity. That said, if the rule, good or bad, is precisely written, then players should practice to be able to meet the rule until they change it. What I see our catcher's do is receive the ball in front of the plate and sweep tag. I think that disadvantages the catcher somewhat but that's how you avoid the issue.
Posted: 05/30/2025 at 05:51 AM ET
(In response to this post by 133976Hokie)

Thread Replies (10)

Full Thread →
Absolutely idiotic obstruction call in Ole Miss
GCHokieof91 05/29/25 09:28 PM ET
And once again in Oregon-UCLA. **
VTChip 05/30/25 12:58 AM ET
This rule is ridiculous, especially when runner is out by a mile**
133976Hokie 05/30/25 01:01 AM ET
I tend to agree that if the defense is sitting there with the ball,
nkhooch 05/30/25 05:51 AM ET
Well at least justice prevails
VTChip 05/30/25 01:14 AM ET
That’s my biggest objection
VTChip 05/30/25 01:05 AM ET
The rule written penalizes the defense for playing good defense, it's like
PokieHokie 05/30/25 11:49 AM ET
The calling of balls and strikes is rarely consistent these days in both
RJHokie 05/30/25 12:05 PM ET
Do umps get NIL money?**
Blueboy 05/30/25 01:08 AM ET
Yeah, that was just a foot. Not like an entire bent leg. But, there
nkhooch 05/29/25 11:06 PM ET
It’s certainly a rule that needs to be addressed
VTChip 05/29/25 10:35 PM ET