I tend to agree that if the defense is sitting there with the ball,
obstruction should not be an issue. But, how would you make a rule based upon how far away from the plate the runner is when the ball is caught? That would also introduce some subjectivity. That said, if the rule, good or bad, is precisely written, then players should practice to be able to meet the rule until they change it. What I see our catcher's do is receive the ball in front of the plate and sweep tag. I think that disadvantages the catcher somewhat but that's how you avoid the issue.
Thread Replies (10)
Absolutely idiotic obstruction call in Ole Miss
-- GCHokieof91
May 29, 2025 at 09:28 PM ET
GCHokieof91
•
05/29/25 09:28 PM ET
And once again in Oregon-UCLA. **
-- VTChip
May 30, 2025 at 12:58 AM ET
VTChip
•
05/30/25 12:58 AM ET
This rule is ridiculous, especially when runner is out by a mile**
-- 133976Hokie
May 30, 2025 at 01:01 AM ET
133976Hokie
•
05/30/25 01:01 AM ET
I tend to agree that if the defense is sitting there with the ball,
◄
-- nkhooch
May 30, 2025 at 05:51 AM ET
nkhooch
•
05/30/25 05:51 AM ET
The rule written penalizes the defense for playing good defense, it's like
-- PokieHokie
May 30, 2025 at 11:49 AM ET
PokieHokie
•
05/30/25 11:49 AM ET
The calling of balls and strikes is rarely consistent these days in both
-- RJHokie
May 30, 2025 at 12:05 PM ET
RJHokie
•
05/30/25 12:05 PM ET
Yeah, that was just a foot. Not like an entire bent leg. But, there
-- nkhooch
May 29, 2025 at 11:06 PM ET
nkhooch
•
05/29/25 11:06 PM ET
It’s certainly a rule that needs to be addressed
-- VTChip
May 29, 2025 at 10:35 PM ET
VTChip
•
05/29/25 10:35 PM ET