Do you take this and run? Athletic article...
I will not post the full article or all the hypotheticals...but I quickly say yes...
Major conferences’ television rights are pooled
The Supreme Court’s 1984 decision allowing schools and conferences to negotiate their own TV rights sounded great in theory. But in practice, it’s the single decision that’s had the most negative impact on college football. In the decades since, there’s been a gold rush toward television money. If a program’s conference isn’t getting enough, it’s going elsewhere, curse the geography.
The NCAA absolutely should not be in charge of negotiating the television rights. I wouldn’t trust the NCAA to negotiate a better price for an oil change on my car. But pooling TV rights and negotiating with all the conferences as a whole makes sense and protects rivalries and the geography that helped build college football into America’s second-favorite sport.
Sorting out rights with multiple networks across multiple conferences is more complex than it is now, but the NFL manages it. College football would be fine working with ESPN, Fox, NBC and CBS to reach a conclusion that makes sense.
ACC
TEAM
Clemson
Duke
Louisville
Maryland
North Carolina
North Carolina State
Rutgers
South Carolina
Virginia
Wake Forest
Southwest
TEAM
Arkansas
Baylor
Houston
SMU
TCU
Texas
Texas Tech
Texas A&M
Big East
TEAM
Boston College
Florida
Florida State
Miami
Penn State
Pitt
Syracuse
West Virginia
Virginia Tech
UCF
SEC
TEAM
Alabama
Auburn
Georgia
Georgia Tech
Kentucky
LSU
Mississippi State
Ole Miss
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
https://theathletic.com/4691922/2023/07/17/college-footba...
7 Replies
3y
and Rutgers need to switch conferences;
and the PAC# and B1G just keep rollin along ... in different economic directions.
just another proposal that will never see the light of day nor could ever be financed
by all the money in Disney+Apple+ESPN+BidenInc+Microsoft+Twitter+Google+Meta
combined.
plus it makes too much geographic, travel, rivalry and common sense.
it was fun to think about for a millisecond
(In response to this post by tcc_dc)
S
Stech
3y
(In response to this post by tcc_dc)
"Back To The Future". Cue up the Huey Lewis and News right now, baby.
If someone had the power to do what is suggested here, why not go all the way?
I'd dial it back to the days of small conference round robin play. Go back to the days when the SWC was intact, and build from there. I think the SEC and B1G would love to go back to 10 members. Have every conference have 11 teams (10 games. 5 home, 5 away, 3 OOC games)
SWC
Texas
Texas A&M
Texas Tech
Arkansas
Baylor
TCU
(add 5 to get to 11, possible adds: Utah, BYU, SMU, Houston, Rice, New Mexico, Memphis, Southern Miss, Tulane, et al)
Big 8
Oklahoma
Nebraska
Oklahoma State
Colorado
Kansas
Kansas State
Missouri
Iowa State
(add 3 to get to 11, possible adds: BYU, Utah, Boise State, Colorado State, Wyoming, North Dakota State, Montana, et al)
Big Ten
Ohio State
Michigan
Michigan State
Purdue
Indiana
Illinois
Northwestern
Minnesota
Wisconsin
Purdue
(add 1: Buffalo, Stony Brook, Toronto, McGill if you buy into the AAU thing)
Pac10
USC
UCLA
Stanford
Cal
Oregon
Oregon State
Washington
Washington State
Arizona
Arizona State
(add 1: Fresno State, SDSU, UNLV, Utah, Boise?)
SEC
Florida
Georgia
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
Kentucky
Alabama
Auburn
Ole Miss
Mississippi State
LSU
(add 1: Louisville or East Carolina?)
ACC
Clemson
Georgia Tech
North Carolina
NC State
Duke
Wake Forest
Virginia
Maryland
Florida State
(add 2 to get to 11, possible adds: Louisville, Cincinnati, Memphis, Tulane, Southern Miss et al)
Old Eastern Independents/Big East
Penn State
Pitt
Boston College
West Virginia
Syracuse
Rutgers
Miami
Virginia Tech
South Carolina
(add 2 to get to 11, possible adds: UConn, East Carolina, et al)
All champs get an auto bid to CFP.
Save another slot for G5 (best of the rest).
4 at-large for independents or conference runner-ups or an additional kick-ass G5.
Tournament would be better.
Regular season would be better.
Drop the conference title game and just give everyone an extra OOC game.
** Edited by Maroon Baboon at 7/19/2023, 4:50:46 PM
(In response to this post by tcc_dc)
V
VPI_1998
3y
didn't completely dominate. I think we had a national champion from almost every "major" conference between 1990 and 2001, didn't we?
PAC-10 - Washington
B1G - Michigan (maybe another?)
Big 8 - Nebraska (x3)
ACC - GT,FSU (x2)
Big East - Miami (x2 I think?)
SEC - Florida/Alabama
** Edited by VPI_1998 at 7/20/2023, 8:30:44 AM
(In response to this post by Maroon Baboon)
2
2hhoop3
3y
same problem at the total conference level that now exists for individual members within a conference. Currently the quandary within a conference is how to share revenue amongst members who may be more or less committed to investing in their programs(i.e. producers vs. freeloaders). With the proposed model the distinguishing moves from individual schools to individual conferences. The playoff money is another tricky detail revolving around playoff team selection to start and progressing from there to per round payments, expense reimbursement, etc..
(In response to this post by tcc_dc)
3y
season money.
Also, I think I'd add a B12. the Bias from the East coast on football in the Midwest smacks of the current PAC situation.
Y'ALL need to get out to Kansas and Iowa and witness fans as or more passionate than VT.
(In response to this post by tcc_dc)