Wall Street Journal ranks College π Brands last wk ACC VT 22 FSU 25 NCSU38
UNC 39 and Miami 40. I know some of you think that you know more about the financial values than the Wall Street Journal, but you donβt. π€£π€£ They use financial formulas instead of opinion. π€£ Seriously, when they talk, you should listen. π
PS Thanks to Cunningfam pulling it off the subscription article.
Edit: I forgot Clemson at 27
** Edited by Stech at 1/30/2025, 5:28:15 PM
10 Replies
1y
VT 22
FSU 25
Clemson 27
NC State 38
UNC 39
Miami 40
GT 43
Lβville 46
Duke 48
Syracuse 49
Cal 50
Pitt 51
UVA 53
BC 54
Stanford 56
Wake 65
SMU 67
(In response to this post by Hardcore_Hokie)
1y
(In response to this post by Hardcore_Hokie)
V
VTCALS72
1y
I would say they are looking at a whole different set of values to assign a worth. I am guessing this model is way more heavily weighted to the things VT does best, attendance, gameday etc. where ESPNs is TV viewers. And BTW there was another of these that had VT at somewhere in the 50s. So which is right.
(In response to this post by Stech)
1y
VT would be wise to start pushing for the best TV (time, day and network) placement IF TV/media ratings are the measurement.
(In response to this post by VTCALS72)
V
VTCALS72
1y
(In response to this post by VT757to276)
1y
...in the regular season (multiple ACC Championship Game showdowns).
These are the changes that will benefit everyone in the ACC.
Even if VT loses to Clemson every other year, it builds the ACC and VT βbrandβ long-term. Same with Notre Dame, FSU, and Miami.
Look at Penn State. Theyβve benefited for 25 years by playing (and losing to) Ohio State and Michigan. Now they are on the literal cusp.
Penn State is our model. And our coach knows a little about that.
(Ditto South Carolina)
VT BABY!!!
(In response to this post by VT757to276)
1y
(In response to this post by VTCALS72)