Login | Sign Up
TechSideline

All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Conference Realignment Board
◀ ▶
M
Joined: 01/05/2001
Posts: 18,618
Likes: 7,576
mancunian
Subscriber

Piss off, kid.

Posted: 09/01/2023 at 06:03 PM ET
(In response to this post by xx97)

Thread Replies (35)

Full Thread →
B12 rejects are now official ACC members!
xx97 • 09/01/23 03:19 PM ET
Who did you beat out for Colorado ect? Lol**
HokiePail • 09/01/23 07:00 PM ET
Why the insecurity?
Old Line Hokie • 09/01/23 06:48 PM ET
Logic won't work with the Big12 fanatics. Desperate to be #3.**
neworleanshoo • 09/01/23 06:50 PM ET
I'm nit the one pretending the b12 had any interest in Calford.
xx97 • 09/01/23 07:07 PM ET
Oh, so now it's that the Big12 had no interest? Gotcha.**
neworleanshoo • 09/01/23 07:10 PM ET
Piss off, kid.** ◄
mancunian • 09/01/23 06:03 PM ET
Yep, kind of like you all with BYU, Houston and UCF…
BROman Hokie • 09/01/23 04:49 PM ET
I agree that the b12 and acc have more in common than not
xx97 • 09/01/23 06:07 PM ET
Still, the ACC didn’t lose its top brands**
BROman Hokie • 09/01/23 10:18 PM ET
Arizona is the only program that moves the needle. But yes, good for you.**
neworleanshoo • 09/01/23 08:59 PM ET
Repeatedly saying it does not make it so. SMU is the only "reject"
neworleanshoo • 09/01/23 04:46 PM ET
Please detail where Cal and Stanford "had no interest"...
xx97 • 09/01/23 07:08 PM ET
Cal and Stanford never applied to B12 to be rejected - and not sure b12
Hokie12thman • 09/01/23 03:38 PM ET
Says who?
xx97 • 09/01/23 04:03 PM ET
Not accurate.......
2hhoop3 • 09/01/23 10:36 PM ET
Correct - SMU was rejected by Big 12 - like I said -already have 4 in TX
Hokie12thman • 09/01/23 05:37 PM ET
Of course, because SMU is obvious overlap with TCU.**
neworleanshoo • 09/01/23 04:47 PM ET
So was Utah with BYU. Dogs are dogs.**
xx97 • 09/01/23 06:11 PM ET
Yes but you're the one who took them. Also, don't forget Baylor.
neworleanshoo • 09/01/23 06:48 PM ET
The main reason SMU madezero sense is because
xx97 • 09/01/23 07:10 PM ET
That's yet to be seen, but we got them for FREE and got into Texas.**
neworleanshoo • 09/01/23 07:11 PM ET
SMU begged the b12 for free membership long ago. They're crap.**
xx97 • 09/01/23 07:13 PM ET
Again, the Big12 already had stupid overlap, that's why they weren't added.
neworleanshoo • 09/01/23 08:57 PM ET
Oh look, it’s message board version of the UnaBomber**
ombandit • 09/01/23 03:36 PM ET
There was rejection, but not by the B12.**
Stech • 09/01/23 03:33 PM ET
B12 already rejected a full on PAC merger. They didn't want the 4 rejects.
xx97 • 09/01/23 04:04 PM ET
Right on SMU, wrong on Stanford and Cal, but stop the rivalry stuff, this
Stech • 09/01/23 04:33 PM ET
Nothing personal. Just having fun with realignment.
xx97 • 09/01/23 05:00 PM ET
Full yes, but they knew Stanford and Cal would not come, Oregon State and
Stech • 09/01/23 05:19 PM ET
I've seen nothing to suggest the b12 had any interest in the Pac 4.
xx97 • 09/01/23 06:15 PM ET
Sure they were done, because Stanford and Cal had no interest.**
Stech • 09/01/23 08:40 PM ET
Hey, Richard! You have yet to share UCFs
HOKIEGOBBLE • 09/01/23 03:27 PM ET
Not a UCF fan. But I bet it smokes SMU, Cal, and Stanford's, though
xx97 • 09/01/23 04:05 PM ET
You've got some real Baghdad Bob energy going. I like it. **
KaHOOnah • 09/01/23 03:27 PM ET
Huh?
xx97 • 09/01/23 04:01 PM ET