came out, and the NCAA banned Sorsby. He was banned from playing, and TT not only complied, they did not complain, nor did they try to fight it. Then you get a judges order on Monday that states that the kid is eligible. We all know what the right thing is for the "integrity" of the game, but that argument sounds hollow to me given the developments over the past several years. It's easy to call out TT. What is the right thing to do for the kid? He is 22, and no where out there is anyone talking about that. A judges ruling states that he is eligible, and not even TT has come out and said they agree with the ruling. As a matter of fact, I have yet to see one article, or even on poster that has come out in favor of that ruling - including me. Pay his scholarship, pay his NIL, keep him on the team and support his recovery - but don't play him. It will not matter what TT does here. Kick him off the team, and go to court. Have the B12 ban him, and go to court. Play him, and be ostracized by all of the hypocrisy the sport has exhibited over the years. This is a text book example of why the NCAA needs to have anti trust. I don't know how you can fairly compensate the players - it's a mess - but a simple rule that gambling on your team? That should be an easy one, and a judge (bias or not) should not e the one making the rules.