Joined:
01/01/2005
Posts:
41,416
Likes:
17,028
I do have a problem with forcing G6 schools to "maybe cut some sports" now
that they have lost a potential revenue stream. It seems wrong at some levels. Particularly if the school is a public school and located in a state that allows taxpayers' dollar to fund collegiate athletics in some way. People don't seem thrilled about the idea of the P2s doing their own thing for multiple reasons. If the G6s are forced to cut sports and the cuts drop them below the DI threshold, then it could have the same unintended consequence.
Plus, there are certain non-revenue sports that are heavily depended upon the G6s and other non-P2 schools to have enough teams so the sport can qualify as a NCAA sponsored sport. If enough non-revenue sports lose their NCAA status because not enough DI teams sponsor the sport, then what are the implications as it relates to Title IX?
Thread Replies (3)
Should SEC be getting props for ending cupcake weekend?
-- harlote101
May 27, 2026 at 05:00 AM ET
harlote101
•
05/27/26 05:00 AM ET
Can't wait to see all the additional SEC losses at the end of the year.**
-- Baltimore_Hokie
May 27, 2026 at 12:57 PM ET
Baltimore_Hokie
•
05/27/26 12:57 PM ET
Those G6 schools get paid to play P4 teams. This is going to hurt them
-- HokieAl
May 27, 2026 at 08:44 AM ET
HokieAl
•
05/27/26 08:44 AM ET
I do have a problem with forcing G6 schools to "maybe cut some sports" now
◄
-- VTHokie2000
May 27, 2026 at 11:18 AM ET
VTHokie2000
•
05/27/26 11:18 AM ET