Looks like you didn't even read the whole two line post. Boosters can donate to the school and/or NIL. Media money goes to the school. For sake of argument, assume all schools have equally funded boosters. Schools with more media money direct boosters to donate greater percentage to NIL. More money available to recrui...uhhh, I mean for "NIL" Non P2 conference boosters should just donate more to make up for less media money? - I guess they can also just eat cake if they don't have any bread... I'm a supply/demand, survival of the fittest type guy - if the market doesn't support an ACC that has competitive teams, so be it, but "just cut a check" is naive.