now while playing 3 or 4 home games against Directional Michigan School or Pick Your Favorite Sun Belt School. If they are a member of a conference that is perceived to be tough (or deep), then may have cracked the formula on giving themselves the best chance to make the FBS Playoffs most years. If no one writing the checks is calling for change to the status quo, then why rock the boat? If fans want their school to treat football like a big business, then just maybe the status quo for OOC scheduling is the best business decision the school can make. Otherwise, we would see more P4s scheduling 2-4 OOC games against P4 schools every year. Instead, there have only been a handful of times since 1990 when a P4 has scheduled all their OOC games against P4 opponents. Even opting for 3-of-4 (if playing 8 conference games) or 2-of-3 (if playing 9 conferences games) may not be that high of percentage during that time. If change is going to occur, then all P4 conferences will need some sort of incentive to change their requirements from 1 P4 OOC game each year to 2 P4 OOC games each year. That change may have become tougher to implement since the conferences are switching to 9 conference games and the scheduling issue that comes up in years when teams are scheduled to play 5 away conference games.