Login | Sign Up
TechSideline

All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Conference Realignment Board
◀ ▶
V
Joined: 11/07/2020
Posts: 18,078
Likes: 13,320
VTCALS72
Subscriber

So if

ahhh that big IF just like just about every Big 12 led podcast, but still if the GOR is upheld in federal court and ESPN says FSU leaving would reduce the payout to the remaining teams then why shouldn't the leaving teams pay to the remaining teams an amount equal to what the remaining schools would get if the entire league stayed together and ESPN continued til 2036? Say FSU, Clemson, UNC, UVA and Miami decided to leave and ESPN values the remaining 10 teams @ 10 mill less per team per year. so 10 teams losing 10 mil + ACC conference losses = at least 1 billion plus conference and legal fees would probably double that so 2 bill paid by 5 teams = 400 mil per departing team. Wouldn't that be fair?
Posted: 07/11/2024 at 12:59 PM ET
(In response to this post by EDGEMAN)

Thread Replies (26)

Full Thread →
NC Judge denies Clemson motion to stay case must continue in NC**
jdkhokie • 07/10/24 02:50 PM ET
I don’t understand the drama. What am I missing?
VT ChemE 1986 • 07/11/24 09:45 AM ET
I don't believe the actual Grant of Rights Agreement cites any state as the
VTHokie2000 • 07/11/24 10:39 AM ET
If the GOR is defined in a contract it would be legal malpractice
VT ChemE 1986 • 07/11/24 11:43 AM ET
Isn't it that the media contract is between ESPN and the ACC, not the
VTCALS72 • 07/11/24 12:48 PM ET
It is unlikely the GoR was clearly defined in the contract between the ACC
VTHokie2000 • 07/11/24 12:11 PM ET
This is the only copy I’ve seen. Signed by UNC. No forum selection clause
CrystalCoveHokie • 07/11/24 11:56 AM ET
This looks like an addendum. As such it should be attached to the
VT ChemE 1986 • 07/11/24 12:12 PM ET
Here is the extension to 2036…
CrystalCoveHokie • 07/11/24 12:38 PM ET
This just keeps getting weirder and weirder....**
VT ChemE 1986 • 07/11/24 01:39 PM ET
Welcome to the ACC. The gift that keeps on giving. :-)**
VTHokie2000 • 07/11/24 01:53 PM ET
Eh...not that surprised by the ruling. Then again, I thought this case was
VTHokie2000 • 07/10/24 07:25 PM ET
That's not how it works. This isn't a federal case.
SpeakToDamien • 07/10/24 11:01 PM ET
It will eventually end up there. Too many states and schools affected
VTCALS72 • 07/11/24 08:37 AM ET
Charge F$U $2B to leave now!
EDGEMAN • 07/11/24 10:25 AM ET
So if ◄
VTCALS72 • 07/11/24 12:59 PM ET
Would that be fair if VT was the one suing?**
Big12 guy • 07/12/24 07:01 AM ET
The GOR is what the GOR is and I think it is a valid
VTCALS72 • 07/12/24 08:43 AM ET
If either school can make a compelling argument that the Commerce Clause
VTHokie2000 • 07/11/24 01:31 AM ET
Nope….
CrystalCoveHokie • 07/11/24 11:15 AM ET
I have a ruling in Nevada that Utah does not feel compelled to follow…..
CrystalCoveHokie • 07/10/24 11:26 PM ET
Full faith and credit clause **
SpeakToDamien • 07/11/24 10:12 AM ET
No final judgment**
CrystalCoveHokie • 07/11/24 10:54 AM ET
My litigation partners tell me if NC rules first, Florida will honor it**
SpeakToDamien • 07/11/24 11:00 AM ET
Perhaps….But that seems to me to be more of a matter of discretion….
CrystalCoveHokie • 07/11/24 11:34 AM ET
I'm def not a litigator .... I do think it needs to final, unappeable.**
SpeakToDamien • 07/11/24 08:22 PM ET
If someone finds the ruling posted as a freestanding PDF, please link. TIA**
LeadingEdge • 07/10/24 05:26 PM ET