Login | Sign Up
TechSideline

All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Conference Realignment Board
◀ ▶
V
Joined: 01/01/2005
Posts: 7,328
Likes: 10,055
VT ChemE 1986

This looks like an addendum. As such it should be attached to the

master agreement. The master agreement will have all of the terms around governing state law, dissolution, etc. Also, this document only shows the term of the GOR to be through June 30, 2027, which really makes it secondary to the challenges by FSU and Clemson. If their constraints really ended on that day, they wouldn't be spending the money to fight it. They must be fighting terms in the master agreement. That is the primary issue.
Posted: 07/11/2024 at 12:12 PM ET
(In response to this post by CrystalCoveHokie)

Thread Replies (26)

Full Thread →
NC Judge denies Clemson motion to stay case must continue in NC**
jdkhokie • 07/10/24 02:50 PM ET
I don’t understand the drama. What am I missing?
VT ChemE 1986 • 07/11/24 09:45 AM ET
I don't believe the actual Grant of Rights Agreement cites any state as the
VTHokie2000 • 07/11/24 10:39 AM ET
If the GOR is defined in a contract it would be legal malpractice
VT ChemE 1986 • 07/11/24 11:43 AM ET
Isn't it that the media contract is between ESPN and the ACC, not the
VTCALS72 • 07/11/24 12:48 PM ET
It is unlikely the GoR was clearly defined in the contract between the ACC
VTHokie2000 • 07/11/24 12:11 PM ET
This is the only copy I’ve seen. Signed by UNC. No forum selection clause
CrystalCoveHokie • 07/11/24 11:56 AM ET
This looks like an addendum. As such it should be attached to the ◄
VT ChemE 1986 • 07/11/24 12:12 PM ET
Here is the extension to 2036…
CrystalCoveHokie • 07/11/24 12:38 PM ET
This just keeps getting weirder and weirder....**
VT ChemE 1986 • 07/11/24 01:39 PM ET
Welcome to the ACC. The gift that keeps on giving. :-)**
VTHokie2000 • 07/11/24 01:53 PM ET
Eh...not that surprised by the ruling. Then again, I thought this case was
VTHokie2000 • 07/10/24 07:25 PM ET
That's not how it works. This isn't a federal case.
SpeakToDamien • 07/10/24 11:01 PM ET
It will eventually end up there. Too many states and schools affected
VTCALS72 • 07/11/24 08:37 AM ET
Charge F$U $2B to leave now!
EDGEMAN • 07/11/24 10:25 AM ET
So if
VTCALS72 • 07/11/24 12:59 PM ET
Would that be fair if VT was the one suing?**
Big12 guy • 07/12/24 07:01 AM ET
The GOR is what the GOR is and I think it is a valid
VTCALS72 • 07/12/24 08:43 AM ET
If either school can make a compelling argument that the Commerce Clause
VTHokie2000 • 07/11/24 01:31 AM ET
Nope….
CrystalCoveHokie • 07/11/24 11:15 AM ET
I have a ruling in Nevada that Utah does not feel compelled to follow…..
CrystalCoveHokie • 07/10/24 11:26 PM ET
Full faith and credit clause **
SpeakToDamien • 07/11/24 10:12 AM ET
No final judgment**
CrystalCoveHokie • 07/11/24 10:54 AM ET
My litigation partners tell me if NC rules first, Florida will honor it**
SpeakToDamien • 07/11/24 11:00 AM ET
Perhaps….But that seems to me to be more of a matter of discretion….
CrystalCoveHokie • 07/11/24 11:34 AM ET
I'm def not a litigator .... I do think it needs to final, unappeable.**
SpeakToDamien • 07/11/24 08:22 PM ET
If someone finds the ruling posted as a freestanding PDF, please link. TIA**
LeadingEdge • 07/10/24 05:26 PM ET