Other. The purpose of the GOR is actually to keep the conference together. One of the purposes of keeping the conference together is so we can sign a lucrative media deal, one that includes a network. But that is not the only purpose for keeping the conference together, but without it, I can't see the schools signing such a long-term GOR. GOR grants media rights to the conference for a certain period of time. The GOR does not include any conditions related to media contracts or conference network. Those connections would have to be argued in court. Once things go to court who knows what happens. But the two separate contracts are not connected in a way that would cause one to end because the other came to an end. That will require a court battle. I would agree that there's a strong argument to be made, but that argument will have to be made in court. And if the fact that ESPN has the choice to opt out halfway through the contract was hidden from the schools when they were asked to sign the GOR, then that makes an even stronger argument I would think. The ACC is not going to just throw away the GOR because ESPN chooses not to renew. In fact, I would expect the ACC to argue that the GOR is more important than ever, because now they need to keep the conference together to negotiate a new media deal. I would expect FSU and Clemson to argue they signed the GOR because of a specific media deal with ESPN. But no specific media deals are listed as reasons for the GOR in the contract. Those connections have to be argued in court. ** Edited by wwhokie1 at 3/30/2024, 2:48:10 PM