Login | Sign Up
TechSideline

All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Conference Realignment Board
◀ ▶
T
Joined: 07/16/2012
Posts: 6,026
Likes: 7,462
TDVick
Subscriber

I think that UVA is in a lot better spot than we are. Do you think they

won't get a B10 invite? I think they would, due to their academics and I think that UNC could dictate that NCSU and probably UVA get included as well. I think a conference adding UVA and VT would be too dilutive. That's why the prediction I lean with is that UNC, NCSU and UVA end up in B10. In which case I think that makes us more attractive to the SEC, but still quite in doubt. I can see UNC pulling two schools in with them. It's harder to see them pulling in four if it includes both us and UVA. That seems like a real longshot, plus the fact that UNC always burns us. That's how this seems to be setting up again. If UVA only gets and invite, can you see the VA pols blocking that? I don't. This is how UNC might stab us again. ** Edited by TDVick at 8/13/2023, 8:46:28 AM
Posted: 08/13/2023 at 08:45 AM ET
(In response to this post by hokieZ71)

Thread Replies (26)

Full Thread →
Does someone have a take on these FOUR "No" votes, it runs counter to the
TDVick • 08/13/23 06:41 AM ET
My take: the 4 non-academic schools voted no.**
manassashoo • 08/13/23 09:46 AM ET
If ND wants to add those 2 schools, maybe they should join and vote also .**
132598Hokie • 08/13/23 11:04 AM ET
ND gets a vote now**
TerryD • 08/13/23 12:15 PM ET
Once some schools knew there were 4 no votes, it was over and everybody
Stech • 08/13/23 09:11 AM ET
Ok. This makes sense. It was strategic window dressing and everyone
TDVick • 08/13/23 01:31 PM ET
Somewhat so IMO, the 🍀wouldn’t add 1 game with a team they already play,
Stech • 08/13/23 01:45 PM ET
leveraging for more favorable revenue distribution
daveinop • 08/13/23 07:52 AM ET
There wasn’t a vote. 4 no’s doesn’t mean 11 yes votes.
hokieZ71 • 08/13/23 07:49 AM ET
Agreed a waste of time to try and "analyze " this as it signifies little.**
Vippie1 • 08/13/23 08:25 AM ET
Yes it was an unofficial vote or a non-vote, but the allocation of whatever
TDVick • 08/13/23 08:10 AM ET
Honestly I think the best both VT and UVA can hope for in the short term
hokieZ71 • 08/13/23 08:20 AM ET
I think that UVA is in a lot better spot than we are. Do you think they ◄
TDVick • 08/13/23 08:45 AM ET
Stanford didn’t get a sniff from the Big Ten.
hokieZ71 • 08/13/23 09:07 AM ET
That's not true. B1G Presidents wanted Stanford & Cal. Fox was the problem
neworleanshoo • 08/13/23 10:48 AM ET
The Canes No vote didn't count because of a hanging chad ballot.**
VTBoar • 08/13/23 08:01 AM ET
I'm a little disappointed Tech didn't vote "No"
Old Line Hokie • 08/13/23 07:41 AM ET
If UNC is sufficiently accretive, they can pull in NCSU at a full payout
TDVick • 08/13/23 07:25 AM ET
Nah I think that’s a “VT-focused” look at what’s going on.
hokieZ71 • 08/13/23 08:12 AM ET
I agree. we know that about the FSU, UNC and Clemson, but WHY did NCSU vote
TDVick • 08/13/23 08:20 AM ET
NC State has the same governing body as UNC.
hokieZ71 • 08/13/23 08:22 AM ET
To some degree, you're saying that UNC has much bigger pull politically
TDVick • 08/13/23 08:29 AM ET
I want there to be more no votes, not less.**
EDGEMAN • 08/13/23 07:24 AM ET
There are behind the scenes reasons that things are mot for public use
Mercury • 08/13/23 07:53 AM ET
I think we all know that FSU wants out and doesn't have an interest in
TDVick • 08/13/23 08:14 AM ET
Yes. The fact that there were ONLY four is surprising, but the composition
TDVick • 08/13/23 07:30 AM ET
I would like VT in the SEC, reformed ACC, Big 12, Big 10 in that order
OrlandoHokie • 08/13/23 11:22 AM ET