All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

B
Joined: 10/03/2022
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 4,007
Subscriber

ACCN content is ultimately going to be like ESPN Plus.

What you're describing is exactly what ESPN Plus basically is now, at least for college football and basketball, if you're in the American or the Sun Belt. You're not on broadcast at all, the school produces the video, and sometimes (but not all the time) ESPN will send a commentary crew. If they don't, then the school has to put up a commentary crew for the stream as well. Ultimately, the "ACCN" is just going to be another basket of content you select off of a giant menu on a streaming app. The same goes for the SECN and the BTN. They won't be linear cable networks anymore. The big difference is going to be that people will have to actually choose to pay for the content, as opposed to the payment being expressed as a carriage fee bundled in with the rest of their cable bill. They will be like another streaming service you have to pay for. To be clear, I think where we're going here is that folks will have to pay extra, on top of a base ESPN subscription fee, for full access to conference content. Example - your Mississippi State game might be with the base ESPN content this week because they're playing LSU, but it might not be next week when they're playing Missouri - if you want access to that game, you have to pay the $7.99 extra a month for the SEC package. That's what's coming. It's going to hit the SEC and the Big 10 as well, but it's going to hit the ACC worst, because, at the risk of beating a dead horse here, the majority of ACC schools have no fan base, football or otherwise. Once that's the case, the entire revenue model goes right out the window, because stakeholders will have to actively convince people to subscribe to the content. Do you think people are going to be lining up in droves to pay extra money so they can get extra SMU, Syracuse, Wake Forest, Boston College, and Pitt games that would otherwise be locked behind a paywall? That's the coming problem for the ACCN and its ability to generate revenue. And, clearly, ESPN knows this...they treat the ACC like an afterthought in every way one can think to do so. If you think I'm making all that up, just go back and look at the deal Apple offered the PAC right before it imploded. That deal is the way of the future, because linear cable is on its very last fumes. Pretty much everyone I know exclusively uses streaming apps, unless their apartment complex pays for a cable subscription or some similar deal. The only folks I know right now that independently pay for cable packages are my 92 and 94 year old grandmothers.
Posted: 04/16/2025 at 10:03 AM ET
(In response to this post by VTCALS72)

Thread Replies (53)

Full Thread →
Not sure what happens 2 the ACC, but their ESPN owned channel is HUGE, B12
Stech 04/15/25 08:57 AM ET
Absolutely. Remember ESPN Flagship will carry the ACCN.
RandomAsianGuy 04/15/25 06:41 PM ET
It's a bigger deal than many people think, they'll undoubtedly promote SEC
Stech 04/15/25 07:44 PM ET
Good luck moving the masters …**
AnotherTechW 04/16/25 05:43 AM ET
Plenty depends on how well the ACCN is actually doing. Without any
reestuart 04/15/25 10:09 AM ET
Agree with that, that’s a valid argument, how does the ACCN do after losing
Stech 04/15/25 11:12 AM ET
You're still streaming, and paying carriage fees, for a LINEAR CABLE
Baltimore_Hokie 04/15/25 12:13 PM ET
The ACC schools have......
2hhoop3 04/15/25 12:57 PM ET
Ah, so, in other words, they're robbing Peter to pay Paul.
Baltimore_Hokie 04/15/25 01:12 PM ET
Nice try.......
2hhoop3 04/15/25 01:18 PM ET
Either way, it's not paid for and debt service is still being paid.
Baltimore_Hokie 04/15/25 01:38 PM ET
The Network is........
2hhoop3 04/15/25 02:20 PM ET
A few years ago, I filed a FOIA re: how much VT realized from the ACCN.
saret 04/15/25 03:59 PM ET
According to the most recent......
2hhoop3 04/15/25 04:05 PM ET
And, as you've said, how each school chooses to use that ACCN
saret 04/15/25 04:24 PM ET
All likely valid points.......
2hhoop3 04/15/25 04:31 PM ET
LOL, "cheese eating, selfie taking strategic communications savant", that
Stech 04/15/25 04:50 PM ET
Wonderful wordplay. Well said. Again, Whit is his own worst enemy.**
saret 04/15/25 04:38 PM ET
Linear conference networks are a relic of the past. They make no sense-
Baltimore_Hokie 04/15/25 10:04 AM ET
Do you think that linear thing is all the ACCN can be?
VTCALS72 04/15/25 08:01 PM ET
ACCN content is ultimately going to be like ESPN Plus.
Baltimore_Hokie 04/16/25 10:03 AM ET
I think we are at least somewhat close on that.
VTCALS72 04/16/25 10:37 AM ET
I don't disagree, but I am confident that for full access to conference-
Baltimore_Hokie 04/16/25 11:05 AM ET
I get the impression that Packer likes his short commute downstairs. The
wwhokie1 04/15/25 04:30 PM ET
Still pisses me off how they slow-played the release of the ACCN.
Maroon Baboon 04/15/25 10:38 AM ET
It's more or less an expensive status symbol at this point.
Baltimore_Hokie 04/15/25 10:46 AM ET
I will say this. I have watched enough VT Softball 🥎 on the ACCN 📺...
Maroon Baboon 04/15/25 11:59 AM ET
VT's non-revenue sports was what I looked forward to watching when...
EDGEMAN 04/15/25 03:32 PM ET
Like you, I was looking forward to seeing VT's non-revenue sports get more
VTHokie2000 04/15/25 04:45 PM ET
VT should film every non-revenue game and put it up on the ACCN-X**
EDGEMAN 04/16/25 01:46 PM ET
Exactly. I realize for away games/events or neutral site tournaments that
VTHokie2000 04/16/25 02:50 PM ET
Nothing like watching VT Wrestling authoring a conference beat down on ACCN**
Maroon Baboon 04/15/25 04:07 PM ET
I love what we're building in wrestling
obguthr 04/16/25 12:50 PM ET
I understand that the ACCN is making money, you are guessing they won’t
Stech 04/15/25 10:14 AM ET
Go back and read what I wrote, very slowly, because you obviously didn't-
Baltimore_Hokie 04/15/25 10:35 AM ET
Many if not most are watching by streaming, that’s irrelevant, schools like
Stech 04/15/25 11:01 AM ET
Clearly, you failed to read again. Please ignore all my posts if you're not
Baltimore_Hokie 04/15/25 12:07 PM ET
The cable companies are losing subscribers? That can be substantiated. **
Big12 guy 04/15/25 10:20 AM ET
Those cable subscribers are moving to streaming subscribers, so...
EDGEMAN 04/15/25 03:34 PM ET
I don’t have cable, I watch it on Streaming, that’s irrelevant.**
Stech 04/15/25 10:35 AM ET
I guess you're just magically pulling it out of the air onto your TV!
Baltimore_Hokie 04/15/25 12:19 PM ET
Your overall premise is correct
RTFC 04/15/25 10:11 AM ET
I seriously doubt that a pro media personality would rather be doing-
Baltimore_Hokie 04/15/25 10:20 AM ET
Finebaum back drop is fake, you are talking about pennies to set back drop,
Stech 04/15/25 10:39 AM ET
OK, sure, whatever you say. You're right, I'm wrong. I have no argument.
Baltimore_Hokie 04/15/25 10:53 AM ET
My post said your premise was right
RTFC 04/15/25 12:09 PM ET
That post was in response to Stech, but the point remains.
Baltimore_Hokie 04/15/25 12:21 PM ET
a "sports media professional like Mark Packer"
RTFC 04/15/25 12:39 PM ET
No, I KNOW ESPN fired Packer and Wes Durham from their studio show-
Baltimore_Hokie 04/15/25 12:44 PM ET
Uhmm...
RTFC 04/15/25 12:54 PM ET
OK, fine. It was always Packer's plan to do a no-budget TV show from his-
Baltimore_Hokie 04/15/25 01:09 PM ET
Even if that's where he wants it, it's still an issue. It makes the ACCN
reestuart 04/15/25 10:15 AM ET
That's fair - its just not an economic decision.**
RTFC 04/15/25 12:03 PM ET
I agree with both of you on this, I like Packer a lot, but the basement
Stech 04/15/25 12:15 PM ET