All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

M
Joined: 09/15/2012
Posts: 339
Likes: 401
Subscriber

Analysis included realignment as well as NIL, transfers & Coastal chaos

I liked the article, but found it attacking too many issues. Overall, merging all of these issues makes it very hard to just look at the list without his commentary. That said, for teams with a plus ranking (like the Hokies), he indicated how many times the team would have made a 12 team playoff over the past 20 years as a measure. This ability to make the 12 team playoffs was the real focus of his grading. The NIL/transfer aspects are skewing the ratings as much if not more than realignment in many cases. While I like some of the discussion on realignment impacts (such as USC and Oklahoma falling into a "be careful what you wish for" category), it is heavily influenced by NIL issues which are at their root financially (and realignment driven) for teams in new leagues, but largely unchanged if a team stayed in the same league. It also gave plus rankings to many of the PAC schools that joined the Big 12 by comparing their current circumstances to the No PAC reality of 2024 that they were facing instead of a 2022 when the PAC was in place (which the fans and teams likely remember as a base case). I think the fans and athletic programs would not view that as a positive. That said, it is far better than the Oregon State/ Washington State 2024 reality that were easily identified as the biggest losers in the analysis. In terms of the ACC, a lot focused on Coastal chaos being eliminated. Gave minuses to several ACC Coastal teams (including UVA and Duke) as having very little chance to place in the tops of the ACC under the new system (no sneaking in). Similarly, Louisville and NCSU were deemed as teams that were stuck behind FSU and Clemson that may have improved chances. Also note that the ACC was not the only conference with stronger/weaker division issues. SMU had the top rating because they now have a chance (dividing by zero leaves an infinite better chance of making the playoff) and the fact that they were the NIL/booster champions behind Texas in the old SW conference (before the death penalty). ** Edited by mjfhokie at 8/6/2024, 7:02:29 PM ** Edited by mjfhokie at 8/6/2024, 7:04:16 PM
Posted: 08/06/2024 at 07:00 PM ET
(In response to this post by CrystalCoveHokie)

Thread Replies (21)

Full Thread →
Winners and losers so far….
CrystalCoveHokie 08/06/24 01:32 PM ET
Stewart Mandel, as always, proves he is a clueless dork with no idea what-
Baltimore_Hokie 08/07/24 11:02 AM ET
On3 already posting it's projection for the playoff field-
Baltimore_Hokie 08/08/24 12:36 PM ET
Analysis included realignment as well as NIL, transfers & Coastal chaos
mjfhokie 08/06/24 07:00 PM ET
I’m have no clue what he is trying to get at
HokieAl 08/06/24 02:26 PM ET
Man, they are going to be a problem down the road
VaTechHokiesACC 08/06/24 11:11 PM ET
SMU boosters pumping money
HouClone 08/07/24 01:02 AM ET
Yep. Surviving only on donations is not sustainable at all.
reestuart 08/07/24 12:38 PM ET
Maybe not this year but they will be a player in time **
VaTechHokiesACC 08/07/24 01:25 AM ET
Being Power 4 now gives SMU a big boost in terms of playoff opportunities
El Paso Hokie 08/06/24 05:55 PM ET
Must not forget recruiting. It's tough to recruit as a G5. **
Big12 guy 08/06/24 06:14 PM ET
Find out why you guys didn't take them
VaTechHokiesACC 08/06/24 11:13 PM ET
SMU has never been an issue. Even when on equal footing.
reestuart 08/07/24 12:33 PM ET
B12 also had three teams in Texas (+ one in DFW) and were adding a fourth.
Truthahn 08/07/24 11:49 AM ET
The Big 12 didn't take SMU-
Baltimore_Hokie 08/07/24 11:40 AM ET
It came down to TCU or SMU. TCU had the football
Big12 guy 08/07/24 07:10 AM ET
Betting line has SMU (and VT) at 5.5 CONFERENCE wins
VT757to276 08/06/24 02:54 PM ET
Yeah, 4 seems generous to me.**
reestuart 08/06/24 05:20 PM ET
appears you need subscription**
cvillehokie92 08/06/24 01:59 PM ET
I didn’t pay….Close out the form and scroll down….Here is the ACC chart…
CrystalCoveHokie 08/06/24 02:09 PM ET
It's a very funny thing - all the schools in the red-
Baltimore_Hokie 08/07/24 11:31 AM ET
Calford will not be that bad
obguthr 08/07/24 10:48 AM ET