Here would be the per team amounts: B10: 1.61% (18 teams) SEC: 1.81% (16 teams) ACC: 1.15% (15 teams) B12: 0.92%. (16 teams) This is hypothetical, but let's say you didn't rev share in the ACC equally and decided to distribute based on some metrics (eg: attendance, performance, tv draw, etc)... thus let's say you give the bottom teams 66% or less, and the top teams 133% or more. Let's just say that these 4 teams did the worst in a given year: Wake: 0.76% BC: 0.76% Pitt: 0.76% Syr: 0.76% Let's say that these 4 teams did the best in a given year: FSU: 1.6% CLE: 1.53% UNC: 1.53% VT: 1.53% You'd pretty much be on par with the Big 10 regards to CFP distribution. It's not like you have to worry about Wake or BC leaving, because they don't have any leverage because they know the %0.76 is more than they could possibly get elsewher