All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Vienna_Hokie
Joined: 09/16/2002
Posts: 17,623
Likes: 12,575

The article missed the biggest value....gambling

those that are willing to pay for a sports streaming channel are going to be significantly more likely to gamble on sports and sports gamblers will be willing to shell out $50 a month to feed their habit. A streaming channel gives the content owners direct, interactive access to gamblers who are worth a lot more money to them than casual sports fans eyeballs on commercials. Pretty much everything that has happened in the last five years in sports broadcasting, conference realignment, etc is all based on the legalization of sports gambling. Why was FOX willing to pay the big 10 almost double what they had been paying, because they knew control of the content would open the door to interactive gambling, the growth in ad revenue from being bombarded by betting advertisement is nothing compared to in game direct betting. They've been prepping it for a couple years now with the crawls including updated odds, especially on USFL and XFL where the gambling crap is part of the broadcast.
Posted: 02/11/2024 at 02:36 PM ET
(In response to this post by Will Stewart)

Thread Replies (23)

Full Thread →
Why Three Media Giants Made a Hail Mary Bet on Sports Streaming
Will StewartAdmin 02/11/24 12:47 PM ET
They don't mention the NHL. I am a big hockey fan.
OrlandoHokie 02/13/24 04:39 PM ET
So YOU'RE the one (tic)**
WestyHokie 02/16/24 08:17 AM ET
The article missed the biggest value....gambling
Vienna_Hokie 02/11/24 02:36 PM ET
Does streaming lag mess up prop betting?
LeadingEdge 02/12/24 01:17 PM ET
They will figure out what they can do and do it, it will evolve
Vienna_Hokie 02/12/24 01:26 PM ET
Here is John Skipper and David Samson discussing it... Link inside.**
NokieHokie 02/11/24 01:28 PM ET
Yep been saying it & John said it too. We are going to 16 team 🏈 playoff.
Stech 02/13/24 11:43 AM ET
Should be 14. A 16 team tourney makes the SEC and B1G CGs a day of rest.
Maroon Baboon 02/13/24 01:21 PM ET
They could have play in games that give the BIG
Big12 guy 02/13/24 03:17 PM ET
I don’t understand your day of rest comment, could you explain more?**
Stech 02/13/24 03:00 PM ET
They would be unnecessary games of two teams already in the field.
Maroon Baboon 02/13/24 09:14 PM ET
I think he is saying, why would anyone try in those champ games if they
VT Pez4Life 02/13/24 03:17 PM ET
We should all ask.......
2hhoop3 02/11/24 01:21 PM ET
Nevah! 🤬**
ombandit 02/11/24 10:54 PM ET
I don't think they're through "cutting out the middleman." Seems like the
33laszlo99 02/11/24 08:26 PM ET
And don’t forget, ESPN is also a middleman. They don’t create or own
Femoyer Hokie 02/13/24 10:16 AM ET
If anyone tries to cut out the TV networks it would have to be the NFL
tarheelblue 02/14/24 09:07 PM ET
You mean like the PAC12 Network? Good luck with that.**
33laszlo99 02/13/24 11:13 AM ET
The PACN was sold a package of goods, and their distribution
Big12 guy 02/13/24 11:51 AM ET
OK
33laszlo99 02/13/24 03:45 PM ET
They would be part of a bundle, which one is yet to be seen. They
Big12 guy 02/13/24 04:12 PM ET
You are not the first person to have this idea. Do you recall which
33laszlo99 02/13/24 05:22 PM ET
Different time, and different circumstances. many here are worried that the
Big12 guy 02/13/24 05:56 PM ET