Login | Sign Up
TechSideline

All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

The Lounge
◀ ▶
HokieHam
Joined: 01/01/2005
Posts: 10,400
Likes: 2,452
HokieHam

We don’t know as there are many variations with his disorder.

If he has a advantage because of hormones and other factors, which it appears he does, he shouldn’t be allowed to compete.
Posted: 08/02/2024 at 12:25 AM ET
(In response to this post by reestuart)

Thread Replies (69)

Full Thread →
Algerian man breaks Italian woman’s nose. Is celebrated. Links abound. **
RoswellGAHokie • 08/01/24 08:45 AM ET
Yet another real life incident...
Chris ColemanAdmin • 08/01/24 12:26 PM ET
Yup.**
HokieHam • 08/01/24 01:18 PM ET
No, this person is not transgender**
Gobbler-100 • 08/01/24 12:27 PM ET
Genetically male, but phenotypically female. To be clear, not transgender
localhokiekid • 08/01/24 11:51 AM ET
Genetically Male
freemason • 08/02/24 09:17 AM ET
Thanks for adding context. It's almost as if the OP was being intentionally
AbsolutVT03 • 08/01/24 01:37 PM ET
No it’s not.**
HokieHam • 08/01/24 02:32 PM ET
It is because it implies the person being talked about is transgender. If
AbsolutVT03 • 08/01/24 06:38 PM ET
No. It states “Algerian Man.” It doesn’t mention “trans”.
HokieHam • 08/02/24 12:15 AM ET
No I’m saying the truth and facts are much more complex. But people like
AbsolutVT03 • 08/02/24 08:23 AM ET
What narrative?
HokieHam • 08/02/24 10:50 AM ET
The narrative that this is a clear cut case of a biological superior male
AbsolutVT03 • 08/02/24 01:36 PM ET
That IS the case.
HokieHam • 08/02/24 02:05 PM ET
Again I'm arguing that the science of biology is not as clear cut as you
AbsolutVT03 • 08/02/24 03:14 PM ET
The argument by you
HokieHam • 08/02/24 04:16 PM ET
Let's start with your very first sentence which is completely false as
AbsolutVT03 • 08/02/24 06:00 PM ET
Yeah. I must have missed that part. You tend to just drone on and on and
HokieHam • 08/02/24 09:05 PM ET
I appreciate you admitting that you didn't bother reading before shooting
AbsolutVT03 • 08/02/24 11:14 PM ET
TLDR.
HokieHam • 08/03/24 10:35 AM ET
Oh yeah here’s one more fact. You were dead wrong when you made this claim
AbsolutVT03 • 08/03/24 11:52 AM ET
Fact:
HokieHam • 08/03/24 08:16 PM ET
You were wrong. Take the L and move on. Hope that's succinct enough for you
AbsolutVT03 • 08/03/24 10:29 PM ET
Nope. Read the article. You were wrong.
HokieHam • 08/04/24 09:44 AM ET
And which two organizations would that be exactly? I’m not sure you read
AbsolutVT03 • 08/04/24 12:45 PM ET
I did read it.
HokieHam • 08/04/24 03:02 PM ET
So answer the questions. **
AbsolutVT03 • 08/04/24 03:14 PM ET
They’re accessible.
HokieHam • 08/04/24 03:18 PM ET
Zero talking points. I asked you two direct, simple questions that for some
AbsolutVT03 • 08/04/24 03:25 PM ET
Answer accessible.
HokieHam • 08/04/24 11:07 PM ET
That’s not an answer. Your continued avoidance is answer enough though. You
AbsolutVT03 • 08/04/24 11:34 PM ET
Yeah. I tend to read things too fast.
HokieHam • 08/05/24 09:18 AM ET
So why not simply admit you didn’t read your own article instead of
AbsolutVT03 • 08/05/24 12:59 PM ET
Fact. You continue to spout conjecture and misinformation as “fact”. **
AbsolutVT03 • 08/03/24 11:36 AM ET
It’s utterly disgusting.
HokieHam • 08/01/24 09:42 AM ET
What is a woman? Asking for a friend.**
TomTurkey • 08/01/24 09:30 AM ET
What's your definition? You might be surprised as to whether or not...
Gobbler-100 • 08/01/24 12:27 PM ET
If they test as genetically male, they are male.
HokieHam • 08/01/24 01:16 PM ET
So your answer to the question of what's a woman is XX, full stop. Correct?
Gobbler-100 • 08/01/24 01:29 PM ET
Well that's where my definition begins.
Hokie CPA • 08/01/24 03:31 PM ET
I also included in my post factors that are visually observable…..but feel
HokieHam • 08/01/24 02:19 PM ET
It should be ignored because "visually observable factors" are in no way
AbsolutVT03 • 08/01/24 06:51 PM ET
No it shouldn’t. I noticed how you overlooked the punching force of
HokieHam • 08/02/24 12:21 AM ET
No I’m not ignoring it. It falls under the same logic. I doubt every single
AbsolutVT03 • 08/02/24 08:36 AM ET
And I’ve said the whole time….
HokieHam • 08/02/24 10:51 AM ET
And there's your problem. You think it's "simple" when it is in reality
AbsolutVT03 • 08/02/24 01:44 PM ET
Nope. Doesn’t undermine it one bit. The evidence from his fight a day ago
HokieHam • 08/02/24 02:07 PM ET
Mind citing your source for the XY chromosome stuff? All I find is a
AbsolutVT03 • 08/02/24 02:41 PM ET
Oh…..now it’s a Russian conspiracy.
HokieHam • 08/02/24 04:16 PM ET
Your response is a deflection. Would you please answer the question?**
AbsolutVT03 • 08/02/24 05:12 PM ET
Noticed you had time to post a novel above but ignored this.. For the third
AbsolutVT03 • 08/02/24 09:13 PM ET
I mean, lol, I can think of one visually observable factor...
Gobbler-100 • 08/01/24 04:00 PM ET
Hahaha. Well, yes, of course.**
HokieHam • 08/01/24 04:25 PM ET
Problem is, your extra factors are categorically stupid
Nova Hokie 95 • 08/01/24 02:58 PM ET
See the very first sentence of my original reply…….
HokieHam • 08/01/24 04:18 PM ET
Well hold on now ...
Nova Hokie 95 • 08/01/24 04:22 PM ET
You haven’t followed it closely. You can believe it, but there are 0
HokieHam • 08/01/24 05:11 PM ET
One fact and one falsehood
Nova Hokie 95 • 08/01/24 06:12 PM ET
He has XY chromosomes.
HokieHam • 08/02/24 12:11 AM ET
Yeah it's not clear to me that these guys understand...
Gobbler-100 • 08/01/24 04:46 PM ET
There is nothing being reported about the type of genitalia he was born
HokieHam • 08/01/24 05:24 PM ET
this person has lived their whole life as a woman. I've got to imagine
reestuart • 08/01/24 07:31 PM ET
We don’t know as there are many variations with his disorder. ◄
HokieHam • 08/02/24 12:25 AM ET
I am very sure the IOC screwed this up. The testosterone levels...
Gobbler-100 • 08/01/24 03:57 PM ET
one thing about the boxing federation that banned the boxer is they are
reestuart • 08/01/24 07:21 PM ET
Agree fully with your final point
Nova Hokie 95 • 08/01/24 04:27 PM ET
Yeah, absolutely, and honestly...
Gobbler-100 • 08/01/24 04:44 PM ET
This is a good Twit thread explaining the situation.**
HokieHam • 08/01/24 05:38 PM ET
If you want women's sports done right... Get a man to do it.
HokieGator • 08/01/24 09:09 AM ET
a proud moment for the insane **
bigbadbird • 08/01/24 08:54 AM ET