All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

VTChip VTChip OP
Apr 02, 2026 at 12:42 PM ET
Softball Budget for last year
Matt Brown from Extra Points regularly obtains financial data from public schools "by filing tons of Open Records Requests to obtain each school’s FY25 MFRS Report. This is an itemized budget report sent to the NCAA each year, and while imperfect, it is the closest thing we have to a standardized budget dataset in college sports." It does not include info from private schools or from schools located in states that limit open records laws (for example, Pittsburgh and Delaware). Matt emphatically points out that "this data does NOT cover athlete payroll, House settlement payments, NIL, etc. This data comes from the Total Operating Expenses line item on the report. That includes coach and staff salaries, coach buyout and severance packages, recruiting spending, team travel, food, software costs, buy games, and everything that goes into running a program BESIDES athlete payments." "This data also comes from FY25, or July 1, 2024-June 30, 2025. That means this data would be for the 2025 college softball season, when Texas defeated Texas Tech." Matt was able to calculate the average budgets for teams that earned at-large bids to the NCAA tournament, teams that won their conference tournaments (and therefore got an automatic invite), as well as teams that did not qualify for the NCAA tournament, Teams that received at-large bids averaged an expense budget of $3.7 million (28 teams) Teams that won their conference tourneys and got the auto bid averaged $1.7 million (15 teams) Teams that did not qualify for the NCAA tournament averaged $1.0 million (138 teams) Below are the operating budgets from top 55 teams from his database. The good news is that Virginia Tech is ranked #26, spending $3,054,356. The bad news is that Clemson spent $4,313,465 and FSU spent $3,785,339. The numbers from Duke are not available. School FY25 Reported Operating Budget University of Oklahoma.....................$7,724,358 University of Tennessee, Knoxville...$5,807,620 University of Nebraska-Lincoln........$4,631,302 Texas A&M University, College Station..$4,490,934 University of Florida........................$4,481,513 Clemson University - #6.........................................$4,313,465 University of Washington...............$4,296,701 University of Texas at Austin.........$4,048,926 University of Oregon.....................$4,007,540 University of South Carolina, Columbia $3,970,575 University of California, Los Angeles $3,945,889 University of Alabama................$3,887,893 University of Mississippi............$3,854,656 Louisiana State University.........$3,786,974 Florida State University - #15.........................$3,785,339 Texas Tech University................$3,772,933 University of Missouri, Columbia....$3,658,487 Auburn University...........................$3,656,063 Oklahoma State University.............$3,653,489 University of Arkansas, Fayetteville..$3,608,958 Mississippi State University.............$3,289,586 University of Georgia......................$3,278,703 University of Michigan....................$3,207,711 University of Arizona......................$3,148,855 University of Kentucky...................$3,109,448 Virginia Tech - #26...........................................$3,054,356 Arizona State University $3,021,775 University of Central Florida $2,915,988 University of Kansas $2,687,838 Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick $2,592,237 University of Minnesota, Twin Cities $2,584,783 Pennsylvania State University $2,563,528 Indiana University, Bloomington $2,506,011 The Ohio State University $2,498,704 University of Utah $2,405,324 University of Wisconsin-Madison $2,375,936 University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign $2,355,118 University of Iowa $2,349,230 University of California, Berkeley $2,328,572 University of Virginia - #40......................................$2,319,454 University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill - #41.......$2,303,867 Purdue University $2,275,642 North Carolina State University - #43....................$2,235,286 University of Louisiana at Lafayette $2,143,936 Boise State University $2,133,240 Michigan State University $2,131,447 Wichita State University $2,093,987 Iowa State University $2,064,498 James Madison University - #49..............$1,923,736 Colorado State University $1,907,858 Oregon State University $1,901,150 San Diego State University $1,863,959 Texas State University $1,818,247 University of Maryland, College Park......$1,790,898 University of Louisville - #55...................$1,779,642 ** Edited by VTChip at 4/2/2026, 12:48:20 PM

20 Replies

H
Hokie_Forester
4mo
So if VT could find another 2 or 3 million a year they would be of the
top funded programs in the country? I am honestly surprised VT is in the top 30 on this list.
J
Jwunderdog
4mo
I guess the huge gap in TV money the P2 schools get for Football
can help fund other sports, and that gap will only grow.
V
VTScoop
4mo
Thanks for sharing Chip....a couple of notes. House settlement didn't
begin until July 1, 2025. So the 2026 softball season will be the first playing season for with that. You should see all of the House expenses in these budgets moving forward. Certainly, AT THE MINIMUM, you will see the scholarship portion of the house settlement (Revenue Sharing) included, as budgets do include the scholarship dollars attributed to each sport. And almost all sports (with the exception of men's and women's hoops and football) had their House Settlement/Rev Share payments in the form of scholarships (if the sport got additional scholarships). A few schools shrunk the amount of women's hoops Rev Share and added a little to baseball (not here at VT but some others have done that). But I think all Revenue sharing costs (whether cash or scholarship) will be reflected in said sports budgets starting with the next FY reporting. For the difference in some of these budgets, it can be as simple as two or three in state athletes instead of out of state athletes on a roster (or vice versa), simple game day operations expenses, or even one more flight trip in a year versus another. Scheduling with these massive leagues now, by itself, could swing a budget by several hundred thousand. Also, looking at Mississippi State as 21st in those budgets, for example, they spent roughly $200K more than us. In looking at their home schedule (as an example), they play 28 home games compared to 13 for VT. So, their game day operations costs could easily bridge that $200K. And I am not here stirring up VT's gameday experience versus other schools :-). Just wanted to share some food for thought on some of these things when it can swing a few hundred thousand from one year to the next. ** Edited by VTScoop at 4/2/2026, 2:47:33 PM
V
VTScoop
4mo
For the other side of the ledger, if anyone would like to see, the
Operating Revenue for softball for FY 25 was $517,005. The four biggest sources of the revenue: Contributions $235,434 Royalties, Licensing, Advertisement, Sponsorships $195,586 In Kind $12,769 Concessions/Novelty $23,665 VT Softball had a reported 22 participants (officially on the roster).
G
GBOHokie
4mo
Hey Chip. New idea. Everyone needs to buy a hotdog or piece of pizza
Every game. Raise the concessions Overall, that’s more than I expected.
R
RJHokie
4mo
Interesting info.
Thanks
VTChip VTChip OP
4mo
Changes from 2024 to 2025
One are of concern (and one year doesn't make a trend), is that FSU and Clemson increased their spending pretty significantly from 2024 to 2025
TomTurkey TomTurkey
4mo
So, excluded revenue/expenditures are key though blue bloods have it all
2
2hhoop3
4mo
What stood out to you Chip?....
For me, Louisville at $1.779MM was a surprise. The MFRS reports are useful but, people need to keep in mind what they do and do not include and that they are really an order of magnitude tool versus a finely sliced and diced report. Thanks for the info!
VTChip VTChip OP
4mo
As I posted above, the change from 2024 to 2025 is a concern
Both Clemson and FSU increased their spending last year by 20% and 10%, respectfully, while the VT spending went down 10% Of course, the big unknown is NIL, which is not in these numbers.
A
ancient alien 2018
4mo
Drop Volleyball and Golf to club level and this budget could be on par with
Klempsun. Thanks again Babcock. Fund sports no one gives a rats ass about!!
SarahVTHokie24 SarahVTHokie24
4mo
I give a "rat's ass" about both of them..
And the student athletes that worked hard to earn a scholarship
S
Stech
4mo
I understand your sentiment, but 🏌️‍♂️is a drop in the bucket for expense,
it’s impact would be almost negligible. Near the bottom of the list, if not the bottom. Not to mention one of our biggest if not the biggest donors of all time paid to renovate the golf course. Plus many alumni and fans use the golf course for reunions, meetings, celebrations and fundraisers. Consequently, you need to keep the golf course in great condition, and one of the ways to do that is to get feedback from the coaches that use other courses around the country. I think Whit needed to retire last year, and I am okay with cutting some sports with high expenses, but golf isn’t one of them by far and away.
2
2hhoop3
4mo
It is not that simple.....
You have to understand what a sport really costs before any decision is made to cut it. That calculation is not just a straight forward bottom line calculation.
A
ancient alien 2018
4mo
You're correct, totals are not known, but what can be determined is what
percentage of the sport's budget is scholarships, and that's a cost that can be saved. Eliminate OOS tuition like the NC legislature did 4 years ago, and that frees up several million for all sports.
2
2hhoop3
4mo
It is not even that simple......
if a nonrev's scholarship limit is fully endowed scholarships are bottom line neutral. Moreover, the donor(s) that endowed them likely give more and cutting a sport might be revenue negative versus bottom line neutral. The foregoing is before you begin to measure the soft costs. I have said it before and will say it again now. The time to decide on a sport is BEFORE it is created. A later decision to cut a sport is a far more complicated calculation and decision. Eliminating OOS tuition is a policy decision at the state level and an indirect tax on state residents to fund athletics. Yes, it would be nice if the playing fields were leveled between states, however, I am not sure that eliminating OOS tuition is the most equitable or efficient mechanism to accomplish that and I know it is not the most fair to tax paying residents of a state.
hokiepro hokiepro
4mo
Didn’t we go out west in 2024? Maybe I’m off on my year but
Wasn’t that the AZ trip? Not that it’d make that huge of a difference but…?
VTChip VTChip OP
4mo
We went to California last year so it's an offset
W
william floyd
4mo
Probably those two spent more on NIL than Virginia Tech. We need big NIL.
H
Hokie_Forester
4mo
Whatever Pete is selling has worked pretty well but its only a matter of
time before the NIL takes over.