All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

VAHokie89
Joined: 03/07/2002
Posts: 79,005
Likes: 22,767

IMO, a view from RF would have shown not touching (likely)

Or least would have given a more definitive view. IMO, the view we all go was slightly through the corner of the bag from the 3rd base side (I think) which made it hard to see if her foot was touching or had space. At the end of the day, the goal of Pitt is to get it right, and if they could not change it, they could not change it. I would have been unsurprised if they changed it. I believe the umpire had the best view to see (from the RF side).
Posted: 05/17/2026 at 11:52 AM ET
(In response to this post by TomTurkey)

Thread Replies (11)

Full Thread →
Anyone get a definitive explanation about the "non force play at 2nd base"
Vippie1 05/17/26 08:37 AM ET
No one here would get any definitive explanation. Akron coach
VAHokie89 05/17/26 09:29 AM ET
Replay inconclusive, call stands **
TomTurkey 05/17/26 10:16 AM ET
The umpire announced that the call was confirmed, not "stands".
nvpbrown 05/17/26 11:09 AM ET
Football moved to "stands," suggesting inconclusive evidence to overturn
TomTurkey 05/17/26 11:36 AM ET
TV never showed angle from behind 1st; she was straddling the bag **
hokiepro 05/17/26 09:20 AM ET
Mine is replay has to be 100% to overturn. replay couldn't tell if the...
vthhhi 05/17/26 09:01 AM ET
I can go with this I guess - sure looked like RC's foot pushed her foot
U2Hokie 05/17/26 09:48 AM ET
That’s interesting. We never saw a replay that showed the whole play
133976Hokie 05/17/26 08:58 AM ET
There is a photo on this board that claimed to show her left cleat off base
TomTurkey 05/17/26 10:14 AM ET
Here's the post. It is a screen shot frozen in time.**
TomTurkey 05/17/26 10:28 AM ET
IMO, a view from RF would have shown not touching (likely)
VAHokie89 05/17/26 11:52 AM ET